Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How good is Brian Burns 2022 campaign?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Carl Spackler said:

Too scared to post in his favorite thread after a win

Magically shows up after a loss

/calls someone else a chickenshit

Dude I am critical of burns in every thread.  Go read my posts. 

 

You are chicken poo for not backing up your big boy talk. 

 

Yes or no   60 pff      I suspect now the board now sees you showing your ass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Dude I am critical of burns in every thread.  Go read my posts. 

 

You are chicken poo for not backing up your big boy talk. 

 

Yes or no   60 pff      I suspect now the board now sees you showing your ass

You are chickenshit for disappearing when he plays well. I don’t give a flying fug about anything else you say, nor does anyone else with half a brain 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burns did not "dominate" last week. He only got his sacks when we went up by two scores lol

Look, nobody is saying Burns is ass (well he is in run defense), he's just not worth what we could have gotten in a trade. He's a pass specialist (can we even call him that?) that gets dominated in the run game. There are a million of those in the draft. We got duped because we are a dumb franchise. End of story.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carl Spackler said:

So 9 or 10 DEs with fewer sacks are better DEs

Depends. Are they better at playing the run and dropping into coverage? Are they better at being disruptive in general? Do they command double teams or for opposing teams to change their game plans to account for them? Sacks are what every fan always points to, but they're not the most important thing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

Depends. Are they better at playing the run and dropping into coverage? Are they better at being disruptive in general? Do they command double teams or for opposing teams to change their game plans to account for them? Sacks are what every fan always points to, but they're not the most important thing.

he will never acknowledge that post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

he will never acknowledge that post

You have a fetish for making an ass of yourself. Unlike you, I'll say when someone's good and bad. Burns isn't very good against the run, but you're an absolute moron for thinking it makes him anything less than a standout player. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you look at our depth chart, this has to be at the top of the primary needs list. Outside of a true rangy FS that balances Moehrig, I don't see any other "immediate" needs for 2026.  Beyond this year, figuring out C, OT, TE1 and WR3 and probably CB2 (are we going to pay Jaycee and Mike Jack?) are on my radar.  My list at 19 (in no order) : Freeling Thieneman McNeil-Warren McDonald Miller  Sadiq   I think CB is also low key going to be a selection earlier than anticipated...Chris Johnson on day 2 fits what we're looking for, IMO and he balled out at the combine. The salaries we just took on and BY9 coming up, I struggle to believe Mike Jack is a Panther next year.      
    • Walker is a 1 year signing. Stone is a 1 year. BC is coming back from an Achilles injury. Typically takes 2 years to get back to full health, but he's also better inside than at tackle. Yosh retired. Moton will have 1 year remaining on his contract and he's already admitted knee issues. That's banking on a whole lot of nothing at the end of this upcoming season.  As far as challenging Bryce, a challenge can come from any round. It's about finding the right QB with the physical and mental talent that fits the system. Wilson, Dak, Purdy, Brady. Just a few examples of non 1st round QBs that were able to challenge the starters.  Another QB doesn't necessarily have to beat out Bryce, but we should be looking for another starting caliber QB. It's not like Bryce has set the bar so high it's unattainable. The bar is low. The goal is playoffs. Do we throw away a season if Bryce gets hurt, because KP is taking us nowhere. Dan has made some great signings this FA period, I give him that. But replacing Dalton with KP is not aggressively improving our QB room. It's at best a lateral move. This is all about getting better. But this is yet another move that makes it even less conspiracy theory, and more reality, that Bryce is being protected from any real adversity in our QB room. 
    • Oh I think it will be. My point was that we need to be trying to get better in the QB room. KP doesn't do that. He's not going to be a long term plan with a 1 year contract. He's just insurance.  This "should" be a make or break year for Bryce. Either He's a guy worthy of an extension or not. Bringing in a rookie number 2 with potential may net us nothing, or it could get us something. The one thing we can be certain of is KP gets us nothing and that's not a good position to be in.  I don't want to go into next year with no number 2, Bryce not having developed I to a real QB1, and sitting at 12 or 15 needing to move up to take a QB in the draft just like we did for Bryce. It's not an outcome I see going well for us. 
×
×
  • Create New...