Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How good is Brian Burns 2022 campaign?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Carl Spackler said:

Too scared to post in his favorite thread after a win

Magically shows up after a loss

/calls someone else a chickenshit

Dude I am critical of burns in every thread.  Go read my posts. 

 

You are chicken poo for not backing up your big boy talk. 

 

Yes or no   60 pff      I suspect now the board now sees you showing your ass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Dude I am critical of burns in every thread.  Go read my posts. 

 

You are chicken poo for not backing up your big boy talk. 

 

Yes or no   60 pff      I suspect now the board now sees you showing your ass

You are chickenshit for disappearing when he plays well. I don’t give a flying fug about anything else you say, nor does anyone else with half a brain 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Burns did not "dominate" last week. He only got his sacks when we went up by two scores lol

Look, nobody is saying Burns is ass (well he is in run defense), he's just not worth what we could have gotten in a trade. He's a pass specialist (can we even call him that?) that gets dominated in the run game. There are a million of those in the draft. We got duped because we are a dumb franchise. End of story.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carl Spackler said:

So 9 or 10 DEs with fewer sacks are better DEs

Depends. Are they better at playing the run and dropping into coverage? Are they better at being disruptive in general? Do they command double teams or for opposing teams to change their game plans to account for them? Sacks are what every fan always points to, but they're not the most important thing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

Depends. Are they better at playing the run and dropping into coverage? Are they better at being disruptive in general? Do they command double teams or for opposing teams to change their game plans to account for them? Sacks are what every fan always points to, but they're not the most important thing.

he will never acknowledge that post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

he will never acknowledge that post

You have a fetish for making an ass of yourself. Unlike you, I'll say when someone's good and bad. Burns isn't very good against the run, but you're an absolute moron for thinking it makes him anything less than a standout player. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...