Most Efficient Passing Game in the past 6 Weeks

[ECHornet]

I posted before today's game I'd like to see him brought back at 5-8mil/year for 2-3 years with an out before the 3rd year. I also posted the best case scenario would be Darnold having his worst game of the season today so we could sign him on the lower end.

I ended up not being able to watch live, but it looks like he certainly had his worst game. That doesn't scare me off too much since I don't think we wanted to win. So I'm still down with the 2 years, 5mil/year. I doubt we can get him for that but we'll see.

Edited January 8, 2023 by ECHornet

[glenwo2]

6 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

I posted before today's game I'd like to see him brought back at 5-8mil/year for 2-3 years with an out before the 3rd year. I also posted the best case scenario would be Darnold having his worst game of the season today so we could sign him on the lower end.

I ended up not being able to watch live, but it looks like he certainly had his worst game. That doesn't scare me off too much since I don't think we wanted to win. So I'm still down with the 2 years, 5mil/year. I doubt we can get him for that but we'll see.

I think the one thing is that this game may have scared off any potential suitors for him so he might take a cheap backup deal.

Besides, he already made bank (thanks a bunch, Fitterer) with that 5th year option....so he's not exactly hurting for money right now.

[mrcompletely11]

This thread should be pinned to the top

[frankw]

14 hours ago, ECHornet said:

I posted before today's game I'd like to see him brought back at 5-8mil/year for 2-3 years with an out before the 3rd year. I also posted the best case scenario would be Darnold having his worst game of the season today so we could sign him on the lower end.

I ended up not being able to watch live, but it looks like he certainly had his worst game. That doesn't scare me off too much since I don't think we wanted to win. So I'm still down with the 2 years, 5mil/year. I doubt we can get him for that but we'll see.

Sam Darnold is now in the history books as having the 19th worst single game passer rating and after yesterday is also tied for the 9th worst passer rating. He is in the top 20 all time worst list TWICE. Yet you still want to give that man a free bag. GTFO.

Edited January 9, 2023 by frankw

[mrcompletely11]

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Sam Darnold is now in the history books as having the 19th worst single game passer rating and after yesterday is also tied for the 9th worst passer rating. He is in the top 20 all time worst list TWICE. Yet you still want to give that man a free bag. GTFO.

That motherfuger could play for free next year and I still wouldnt want him on the team knowing that dog poo of a game could rear its head

[glenwo2]

15 minutes ago, frankw said:

Sam Darnold is now in the history books as having the 19th worst single game passer rating and after yesterday is also tied for the 9th worst passer rating. He is in the top 20 all time worst list TWICE. Yet you still want to give that man a free bag. GTFO.

Still amazed that he won....

[ECHornet]

16 minutes ago, frankw said:

Sam Darnold is now in the history books as having the 19th worst single game passer rating and after yesterday is also tied for the 9th worst passer rating. He is in the top 20 all time worst list TWICE. Yet you still want to give that man a free bag. GTFO.

Passer rating, eh?

Including the game you mentioned, Darnold’s passer rating for the season was 92.6. That would have been 13th in the league. 
 

The team went 4-2 with him as a starter. 
 

Worth 2 years, 5 mil per? Yes. I still think that’s a great deal. 

[mrcompletely11]

1 minute ago, ECHornet said:

Passer rating, eh?

Including the game you mentioned, Darnold’s passer rating for the season was 92.6. That would have been 13th in the league. 
 

The team went 4-2 with him as a starter. 
 

Worth 2 years, 5 mil per? Yes. I still think that’s a great deal. 

uh, no thats not 92.6 for the season thats for 6 games

[frankw]

13 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Passer rating, eh?

Including the game you mentioned, Darnold’s passer rating for the season was 92.6. That would have been 13th in the league. 
 

The team went 4-2 with him as a starter. 
 

Worth 2 years, 5 mil per? Yes. I still think that’s a great deal. 

[glenwo2]

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Kudos to MJ for recovering that fumble! 

[ForJimmy]

16 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

uh, no thats not 92.6 for the season thats for 6 games

I wonder why he didn’t do career rating? 

[cmichd08]

Yes Sam would be a good back up if we had a good QB ready to go next year. Afraid Corral wasn't the best QB in the 3rd round the Panthers could have picked.

[ECHornet]

Y’all are so mad bearded Sam returned and hurt our draft position by playing the best ball of his career. 

[ECHornet]

15 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I wonder why he didn’t do career rating? 

Career rating would have finished 32nd of qualifying QBs this year. Not good. His first four years were pretty terrible. That doesn’t mean I have to ignore what looks like progress. 
 

Y’all can deny it, but I know you know we’d be division champs if Darnold was healthy all year.