Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most Efficient Passing Game in the past 6 Weeks


Ghostface Chilla
 Share

Recommended Posts

I posted before today's game I'd like to see him brought back at 5-8mil/year for 2-3 years with an out before the 3rd year. I also posted the best case scenario would be Darnold having his worst game of the season today so we could sign him on the lower end.

I ended up not being able to watch live, but it looks like he certainly had his worst game. That doesn't scare me off too much since I don't think we wanted to win. So I'm still down with the 2 years, 5mil/year. I doubt we can get him for that but we'll see.

Edited by ECHornet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

I posted before today's game I'd like to see him brought back at 5-8mil/year for 2-3 years with an out before the 3rd year. I also posted the best case scenario would be Darnold having his worst game of the season today so we could sign him on the lower end.

I ended up not being able to watch live, but it looks like he certainly had his worst game. That doesn't scare me off too much since I don't think we wanted to win. So I'm still down with the 2 years, 5mil/year. I doubt we can get him for that but we'll see.

I think the one thing is that this game may have scared off any potential suitors for him so he might take a cheap backup deal.

Besides, he already made bank (thanks a bunch, Fitterer) with that 5th year option....so he's not exactly hurting for money right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, ECHornet said:

I posted before today's game I'd like to see him brought back at 5-8mil/year for 2-3 years with an out before the 3rd year. I also posted the best case scenario would be Darnold having his worst game of the season today so we could sign him on the lower end.

I ended up not being able to watch live, but it looks like he certainly had his worst game. That doesn't scare me off too much since I don't think we wanted to win. So I'm still down with the 2 years, 5mil/year. I doubt we can get him for that but we'll see.

Sam Darnold is now in the history books as having the 19th worst single game passer rating and after yesterday is also tied for the 9th worst passer rating. He is in the top 20 all time worst list TWICE. Yet you still want to give that man a free bag. GTFO.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Sam Darnold is now in the history books as having the 19th worst single game passer rating and after yesterday is also tied for the 9th worst passer rating. He is in the top 20 all time worst list TWICE. Yet you still want to give that man a free bag. GTFO.

That motherfuger could play for free next year and I still wouldnt want him on the team knowing that dog poo of a game could rear its head

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, frankw said:

Sam Darnold is now in the history books as having the 19th worst single game passer rating and after yesterday is also tied for the 9th worst passer rating. He is in the top 20 all time worst list TWICE. Yet you still want to give that man a free bag. GTFO.

Still amazed that he won....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, frankw said:

Sam Darnold is now in the history books as having the 19th worst single game passer rating and after yesterday is also tied for the 9th worst passer rating. He is in the top 20 all time worst list TWICE. Yet you still want to give that man a free bag. GTFO.

Passer rating, eh?

Including the game you mentioned, Darnold’s passer rating for the season was 92.6. That would have been 13th in the league. 
 

The team went 4-2 with him as a starter. 
 

Worth 2 years, 5 mil per? Yes. I still think that’s a great deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ECHornet said:

Passer rating, eh?

Including the game you mentioned, Darnold’s passer rating for the season was 92.6. That would have been 13th in the league. 
 

The team went 4-2 with him as a starter. 
 

Worth 2 years, 5 mil per? Yes. I still think that’s a great deal. 

uh, no thats not 92.6 for the season thats for 6 games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Passer rating, eh?

Including the game you mentioned, Darnold’s passer rating for the season was 92.6. That would have been 13th in the league. 
 

The team went 4-2 with him as a starter. 
 

Worth 2 years, 5 mil per? Yes. I still think that’s a great deal. 

GIF by Giphy QA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I wonder why he didn’t do career rating? 

Career rating would have finished 32nd of qualifying QBs this year. Not good. His first four years were pretty terrible. That doesn’t mean I have to ignore what looks like progress. 
 

Y’all can deny it, but I know you know we’d be division champs if Darnold was healthy all year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...