Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trey Lance?


tukafan21
 Share

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Who should we draft at 9?

Depends on who's there, and how you graded him. 

As for me, I think you have to go BPA, but with one caveat if you're in QB purgatory like we seem to be in: if it's close, I'd likely go with the QB, even if that's not my usual modus operandi. But, it would have to be close.

As for this draft specifically, outside of the top 3, I just can't see us drafting a QB at nine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Depends on who's there, and how you graded him. 

As for me, I think you have to go BPA, but with one caveat if you're in QB purgatory like we seem to be in: if it's close, I'd likely go with the QB, even if that's not my usual modus operandi. But, it would have to be close.

As for this draft specifically, outside of the top 3, I just can't see us drafting a QB at nine. 

I think we take AR or trade up for Stroud if he drops to around 3-5ish. That’s of course assuming Stroud declares.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

I think we take AR or trade up for Stroud if he drops to around 3-5ish. That’s of course assuming Stroud declares.

I don't believe that we will draft Anthony Richardson at nine. His development will take way too much time to spend that type of draft compensation, and as such I just can't see any sensible GM drafting him in the top 10 (or top 20, really).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

I don't believe that we will draft Anthony Richardson at nine. His development will take way too much time to spend that type of draft compensation, and as such I just can't see any sensible GM drafting him in the top 10 (or top 20, really).

If we hire Johnson I would bet anything we take ar at 9 if we don’t trade up.  The timeline matches perfect.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

If we hire Johnson I would bet anything we take ar at 9 if we don’t trade up.  The timeline matches perfect.  

We'll see. I think Johnson is as good as ours. I don't believe we'll spend that type of compensation on AR though. He's way too raw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

If we hire Johnson I would bet anything we take ar at 9 if we don’t trade up.  The timeline matches perfect.  

Nate Sudfeld is Detroit’s backup and is a FA this offseason. I wouldn’t be surprised if we sign him for cheap abs draft one at 9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Nate Sudfeld is Detroit’s backup and is a FA this offseason. I wouldn’t be surprised if we sign him for cheap abs draft one at 9.

If we're talking about backup / bridge QB types, would anybody be hugely surprised if Johnson decided to give Darnold a shot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Sudfeld knows his offense and would be much cheaper. It just depends on how confident Johnson is in him. Darnold was a Rhule reclamation project. Looking decent in Wilk’s power running offense doesn’t really prove much unless Johnson is wanting to run something similar. New coaches like to bring in some of their own guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If we're talking about backup / bridge QB types, would anybody be hugely surprised if Johnson decided to give Darnold a shot?

I wouldn’t be surprised either way. Johnson has no ties to Sam and Sudfeld would know his offense/how he wants to run things more than any QB not named Goff. Plus he will be pretty cheap…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hornets shooting has definitely cooled off to end the season 
    • Would be cool if Melo and Kon tied for the season league lead in 3’s.  Either that or Kon straight-up.
    • I love the bottom feeding approach.  Not to say I was the only one, but I was screaming to draft Coker and then screaming to get him in here as an UDFA.  There were criticisms about him, etc.  As a Gamecock baby (Dad was a Tight End for them when I was born) I was against Legette.  I wanted the kid from Georgia.   All that to say this:  I am afraid of drafting a WR (I spent some time today researching) a few of the top names: 1. Jordan Tyson.  MCL, ACL, NHL---he has injured everything he could that ends in "L" and some things not related to his body.  He will drop, and everyone will start getting excited around 15.   NO! take him off the board. 2. KC Concepcion.  I want to like him, but is he not John Metchie III II?  I can't stand drops. To me, the most important characteristic for a receiver is hands.  I do not buy the "He can be taught."  I disagree to a degree.  Catching a football at a high level when you are being hit by someone behind you as you run full speed across the field is more about concentration and focus than anything else. You gotta trust your eyes, your instincts, and your QB.  Hard to teach someone not to fear something that hits you that you cannot see.  Dropping passes gets into your head--that makes you second guess yourself.  if it doesn't, it should.  Either way, it is a mental issue.   3. Omar Cooper.  I like him enough, but at 19? No.  He is a good YAC guy with solid hands.  However, he had a good WR across from him, the best QB in the country, a pretty easy schedule (He had his best games against FCS schools) and I wonder how much of the route tree he ran.  I am torn, not sold.  Of the three just mentioned, he has the worst skillset but I would like him the best as our Z. Who then, do I want, you ask? If it has to be WR, trade back.  If you can't, draft the slow guy who can't get a good release.  1.  Denzel Boston.   If it has to be a WR at 19, I think I would take Denzel Boston.  His biggest criticism is the release (and 40 speed) but he had great hands and runs good routes. as the Z, which is what we need, he would be perfect because he could motion toward the LOS and even when on the LOS, he is off the ball.  Lets do some bottom fishing in Coker Lake: Round 2: Ted Hurst.  He is a model Z WR for this offense.  Drops too many balls to my liking, but as a second rounder, I can tolerate that a bit more than a first rounder.  Round 5: Kendrick Law (UK):  This is the guy I am most comfortable drafting.  His average route at KY was under 4 yards.  He is great at running after the catch.  Stats? don't look at the game stats--look at the measurables. A 42-inch vertical, a 10-foot-8 broad jump, and a 9.60 Relative Athletic Score place him among the most explosive receivers in this class. That kind of lower-body power, paired with his balance through contact and proven ability to generate yards after the catch, gives him a real foundation to develop beyond what Kentucky asked of him. I think they were considering drafting a WR in the first round.  I get it, but as with the tackles in round 1, "Buyer Beware."  I have not given up on XL but I am very concerned that his mind is not right for the NFL. 
×
×
  • Create New...