Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possible London game next year at Titans

thunderraiden

By thunderraiden,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

thunderraiden Veteran

thunderraiden

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, t96 said:

They have 9 home games so there’s a 1 in 9 chance and we were just there not that long ago. I doubt we play in London next year

Turns out Jags are a contender as well. and they won't be playing titans and titans wont be playing them as that would just be silly so that eliminates an opponent from both. its actually a 25% chance if my math is correct (2/8 chances if both teams have a pool of 8 opponents to choose from, someone correct me if I'm wrong) that we have an away game in London next year.

With the Chiefs, bills, and patriots also as potential opponents that are ineligable to play two games overseas that might even eliminate more... I'm about to do some more math...

Edited by thunderraiden
Link to comment
Share on other sites
panfanman Experienced

panfanman

Posted
Posted

F U London if this happens.  We've been planning for 4 years now a vacation to Nashville and were planning it for this next year so we could catch the Panthers away game there.  I will be beyond pissed.  These extra 17th games need to be the ones chosen for this nonsense so fans can make plans according to the regular schedule rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thunderraiden Veteran

thunderraiden

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, panfanman said:

F U London if this happens.  We've been planning for 4 years now a vacation to Nashville and were planning it for this next year so we could catch the Panthers away game there.  I will be beyond pissed.  These extra 17th games need to be the ones chosen for this nonsense so fans can make plans according to the regular schedule rotation.

Bruh I've been going to shitty Titan games after the panthers have been eliminated just so I can score some free tixs from my fiancés dad this year. I'm crushed if this happens.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, thunderraiden said:

Titans just announced they are going to London next year for one of their home games, one of our games is in Tennessee next year. Would suck to have such a close away game moved but dem the apples.

It'll probably be against the Jags...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thunderraiden Veteran

thunderraiden

Posted
  • Author
Posted
11 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

Turns out Jags are a contender as well. and they won't be playing titans and titans wont be playing them as that would just be silly so that eliminates an opponent from both. its actually a 25% chance if my math is correct (2/8 chances if both teams have a pool of 8 opponents to choose from, someone correct me if I'm wrong) that we have an away game in London next year.

With the Chiefs, bills, and patriots also as potential opponents that are ineligable to play two games overseas that might even eliminate more... I'm about to do some more math...

Ok so my math was way off, its 2/15 opponents not 2/8. I eliminated the Jags and Titans away games against each other as possibilities as well as the jags hosting the Chiefs since the Chiefs play in Germany. The final chances are 13.33% we are selected for one of the games. Now... if the NFL decides it has to be an AFC vs NFC game the chances obviously skyrocket but for right now its 13.33%

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panfanman Experienced

panfanman

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, joemac said:

Only if you're flying Frontier or Spirit, which are like cattle cars in the air.  All the better airlines are incredibly expensive.  

We just got back.  A few weeks ago.  Flew Southwest nonstop out of Atlanta.  Very reasonable.  I will say this though, we were very lucky.  60% of the flights were cancelled on our way back.  The terminal was a ghost town.  Half the restaurants in the airport closed because of lack of flyers.  Ours wasn't cancelled.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thunderraiden Veteran

thunderraiden

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

Ok so my math was way off, its 2/15 opponents not 2/8. I eliminated the Jags and Titans away games against each other as possibilities as well as the jags hosting the Chiefs since the Chiefs play in Germany. The final chances are 13.33% we are selected for one of the games. Now... if the NFL decides it has to be an AFC vs NFC game the chances obviously skyrocket but for right now its 13.33%

Ok even more terrible news...

if the NFL is in fact teeing this up for an NFC opponent for each of the AFC clubs our chances skyrocket insanely to 40%... the Falcons can't be held to double jeopardy as if they are selected for one... they can't be selected for the other so that adds even more fuel to the fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

Turns out Jags are a contender as well. and they won't be playing titans and titans wont be playing them as that would just be silly so that eliminates an opponent from both. its actually a 25% chance if my math is correct (2/8 chances if both teams have a pool of 8 opponents to choose from, someone correct me if I'm wrong) that we have an away game in London next year.

With the Chiefs, bills, and patriots also as potential opponents that are ineligable to play two games overseas that might even eliminate more... I'm about to do some more math...

Roaring Riot already has cabanas for the Jags game so that’ll be in Jacksonville

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...