Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ground and Pound


WarHeel
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

What is this thread? The Bills are a PASSING TEAM. Have been all year. The only GnP team that I can even think of is Tennessee.

I never said ground and pound identity teams win championships. The point is that teams need to be able to run the ball period. Buffalo hasn’t done it all year and it cost them today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WarHeel said:

I never said ground and pound identity teams win championships. The point is that teams need to be able to run the ball period. Buffalo hasn’t done it all year and it cost them today.

Ah, ok. I thought you were one of those "panthers north" guys who think they're just like us ... or whatever insanity they spew.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

Joe Mixon just rushed 20 for 105 yards in the same game. 
 

Tell me I’m wrong with some substance. 

He was running against Buffalo’s defense. The Bengals defense tightens up in the playoffs. They did it last year too.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Ah, ok. I thought you were one of those "panthers north" guys who think they're just like us ... or whatever insanity they spew.

Nah, even the Bills haven’t outmediocred us as of late. We are our own breed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

He was running against Buffalo’s defense. The Bengals defense tightens up in the playoffs. They did it last year too.

That Buffalo defense was a shell of what it started the year with but even that being said, they were able to run the football when it counted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WarHeel said:

That Buffalo defense was a shell of what it started the year with but even that being said, they were able to run the football when it counted.

My point was the Bills RBs were having trouble running against the Bengals defense. I don’t know how much CMC changes that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

My point was the Bills RBs were having trouble running against the Bengals defense. I don’t know how much CMC changes that.

My point is that they’ve had trouble with running all season. Their run game is abysmal and Allen and Diggs have bailed out their offense all year. 
 

I think CMC would change a hell of a lot but that wasn’t my main thesis for discussion. 

Edited by WarHeel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Growl said:

lol damage control 

 

“ignore what happened today, the thing I want to be true is still true”

What’s not true about the Bills run game being abysmal? 
 

Reading comprehension is a lost art in this place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...