Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Revisiting the CMC Trade

WarHeel

By WarHeel,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheMaulClaw Mentor

TheMaulClaw

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

The only game this happened in for San Fran was yesterdays game which was due to both QBs going down with injury. You look at the 12-13 games before that and CMC was elevating everyone around him. 
 

If you want confirmation, look at Kittle’s numbers before AND after the CMC trade and get back with me

They would have lost regardless of the qb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, TheMaulClaw said:

They would have lost regardless of the qb.

you might could make the case the Eagles are the most overrated team to ever reach the Super Bowl. 

Easiest schedule in the NFL? check. 

Bad Giants team in round one? check

NFCCG? Opposing QB hurt on opening drive. Opponent didn't have QB to attempt a forward pass for the 2nd half. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheMaulClaw Mentor

TheMaulClaw

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, CRA said:

you might could make the case the Eagles are the most overrated team to ever reach the Super Bowl. 

Easiest schedule in the NFL? check. 

Bad Giants team in round one? check

NFCCG? Opposing QB hurt on opening drive. Opponent didn't have QB to attempt a forward pass for the 2nd half. 

Why didn't they have a qb?  They couldn't stop the pass rush.  I'm sure they would like some of those picks back to address that situation.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeAngelo Beason Mentor

DeAngelo Beason

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, WarHeel said:

We were still strongly one dimensional being a run first team with showed in at least 3 games to close out the season when Hubbard and Foreman decided to take a nap. 
 

Disagree all you want but he would have likely helped lead the 49ers to a SB with a 7th round QB had the entire QB roster not fallen apart. Because they  knew how to utilize him.

Disagree with my disagreement all you want, but I think the 49ers were a championship caliber team before he showed up, and I don't think he made a world of difference for them, just like he didn't make a world of difference for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WarHeel Mentor

WarHeel

Posted
  • Author
Posted
35 minutes ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

Disagree with my disagreement all you want, but I think the 49ers were a championship caliber team before he showed up, and I don't think he made a world of difference for them, just like he didn't make a world of difference for us.

They were 3-3 and won 12 consecutive games after he signed. Purely coincidental though….championship caliber teams are generally 500.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted

If anyone actually thought the Niners were going to wipe the floor with the Eagles and the Chiefs with Brock Purdy that's your own fault for believing in fairy tales. The Eagles were the more balanced team. Anyone with eyes could see that running their entire offense through McCaffrey was not built to last or enough to win it all against more well rounded teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, CRA said:

you might could make the case the Eagles are the most overrated team to ever reach the Super Bowl. 

Easiest schedule in the NFL? check. 

Bad Giants team in round one? check

NFCCG? Opposing QB hurt on opening drive. Opponent didn't have QB to attempt a forward pass for the 2nd half. 

The Eagles strength of schedule was harder than the 49er's by far from what I'm looking at. On the other hand the 49er's look to have the easiest schedule according to strength of schedule.

Edit: Just glancing at Tankathon's listed strength of schedule.

Edited by Krovvy
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

The Eagles strength of schedule was harder than the 49er's by far from what I'm looking at. On the other hand the 49er's look to have the easiest schedule according to strength of schedule.

Edit: Just glancing at Tankathon's listed strength of schedule.

think people are using DVOA football outsiders w/ the 32nd claim

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WarHeel Mentor

WarHeel

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

Nothing to do with a change at quarterback, the most important position in the league though, right?

Well you have folks saying they lost the championship game because they didn’t have a stellar QB and you’re saying they went on a 12 win streak because of the change at QB. So which one is it? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
Just now, WarHeel said:

Well you have folks saying they lost the championship game because they didn’t have a stellar QB and you’re saying they went on a 12 win streak because of the change at QB. So which one is it? 

There QB got knocked out on the first drive of the game.   And it essentially killed their chances. 

They had a QB.  One that had been playing great. 

in the NFCCG it turned into a game that featured a great defense and run game.  And you can't win with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DeAngelo Beason Mentor

DeAngelo Beason

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

Well you have folks saying they lost the championship game because they didn’t have a stellar QB and you’re saying they went on a 12 win streak because of the change at QB. So which one is it? 

I personally didn't say anything about them losing the championship because of their QB play.  They lost the championship because they went up against the Eagles, who have been by far the best team in the league all season.  They were outclassed at every nearly every position on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WarHeel Mentor

WarHeel

Posted
  • Author
Posted
35 minutes ago, CRA said:

There QB got knocked out on the first drive of the game.   And it essentially killed their chances. 

They had a QB.  One that had been playing great. 

in the NFCCG it turned into a game that featured a great defense and run game.  And you can't win with it. 

I get that, but having your starting and backup QB get knocked out of a championship level game doesn’t necessarily equate to a player like CMC being invaluable because he can’t win the game for them in that moment. That’s a bit of a stretch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WestPanthers
      a tip of the cap to the Special Juan

      By WestPanthers · Posted

      Thanks !
    • Bear Hands
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Overall, fine.  Wish we landed a guy to pair with Lloyd but I presume this means they're giving Trevin one final year to put it together (72nd overall 2 years back).  Flashed potential year 1, had a dud last year.   R1: Freeling LT - Great value and a need; landed our new long term LT that could end up starting off the bat.  Icky had a terrible injury and is not playing in his contract year.  Walker is what he is on a 1-year rental, who even knows how he fits. You get premier OTs early if you can find em' and he has what you want.  I thought he could have gone as high as 6/CLE pre-draft, so am a big fan of the selection.  Looking at this class, he's one of the guys at the top that is like "okay that's the LT".  Others have this right/left or G/T type discussion about them.  Freeling is an LT.   R2: Hunter NT - We didn't really have anyone replacing A'Shawn's snaps in our rotation.  Wharton & Brown aren't 3 downers so adding Hunter to the mix fills a big void. I dug deep into S and LB this draft so was a bit to zeroed in - In recognize the value and impact add in the trenches. R3: Brazzell WR - Intriguing.  Given our history, I don't really want to place any expectations here, but a different style weapon for Bryce. I pretty much expect a WR drafted yearly with this regime. Other notables.. Hecht C - These are the type of rounds where starting centers have been found.  We got a starter for this year, but Hecht seems pretty capable and I like it for a long term find.  SOLID AF.  Wheatley S - A pretty well regarded safety prospect.  And we see it every year (like this one) safeties get hyped, people think they may go sooner than expected, and the league reminds them how it rolls.  Plenty of nice safeties have been found in the 4th-6th in recent years.  Big fan of Wheatley. Can't say I know enough about Lee or the others. 
    • CPF4LIFE
      Round 7: The Carolina Panthers select LB Jackson Kuwatch (Miami of Ohio)

      By CPF4LIFE · Posted

      I'm excited. I love situations like this when you could potentially find a diamond in the rough on the cheap. And you know guys like this are gonna put in the work and desire way more than others to be great. 
×
×
  • Create New...