Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fangio to Miami official....well...maybe... probably tho


jb2288
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Where is that coming from?  Is that just a rumor or is it confirmed that Tepper has his own guys in mind?

We interviewed him weeks ago not as a HC candidate but as a DC candidate.

https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/gm-report/panthers-interview-vic-fangio

Lots of us questioned at the time why in the world we'd be talking to guys about coordinator positions when we didn't have a HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We interviewed him weeks ago not as a HC candidate but as a DC candidate.

https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/gm-report/panthers-interview-vic-fangio

Lots of us questioned at the time why in the world we'd be talking to guys about coordinator positions when we didn't have a HC.

And if we had gone with one of the young options, I could have seen that making a little sense.

An experienced head coach? And one who's got a lot better record of winning than most of the people associated with this team?

Not so much 😕

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

And if we had gone with one of the young options, I could have seen that making a little sense.

An experienced head coach? And one who's got a lot better record of winning than most of the people associated with this team?

Not so much 😕

David Tepper is smarter than everyone else and he cuts the checks.

That seems to be his mindset.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Part of a conversation with Josina Anderson regarding the Fangio deal...

 

This is like one of the few times I'm glad it seems like "ownership" or maybe Fitt has the right opinion. Bradley is basically the same zone thing that didn't work very well the last few years, he had success with a stacked Seahawks roster and has been riding that train to the bank for the last 10 years in a steady decline

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

This is like one of the few times I'm glad it seems like "ownership" or maybe Fitt has the right opinion. Bradley is basically the same zone thing that didn't work very well the last few years, he had success with a stacked Seahawks roster and has been riding that train to the bank for the last 10 years in a steady decline

I actually like Bradley, but I know a lot of people don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Truth. Like when UNC hired Butch Davis and then we get hit for recruiting violations. Like yeah, no poo. Dude coached Miami when they we paying like the 33rd NFL team. What did you expect?
    • He's a hard player to rank, cause he is a young NT. I do see his abilities to branch out among the DL. That's the only way for him to land in the 1st, some team has to believe he's got the stuff to play DE or T3.... I just don't see using 19 on him, I feel there should be around 7 players just ranked higher than him for the Panthers team.  ___________________________________________________________________   Now you are a roster nut like me. Im tossing this into fire, I think a good move is to trade UP, yes rare. Just the roster #s tell me 5 rookies and no more than 2 starters will make the team. I feel 5 is magic number.    QB- 2  BY, Pickett RB- 3   Chubba, Brooks(pls), etienne TE- 4   Sanders, Temble, Evans, Draft pick/major/franks/UDFA OL- 10   Walker, Lewis, Fortner, Hunt, Motown, Zavailla, Samac, Stone, Draft pick, Draft pick/Charles/carter WR-  6   Tmac, XL, Coker, Metch, Horn, Tremay   offense=  25 with 3 draft picks   DL-  6   Brown, Brown, Wharton, Ray, Cam, Hunter/draft pick Ed-   5  Phillips, Nic, Prince, Jones, ST/incoom/hampton ILB-   5  Lloyd, Wallace, Bam, Claud, draft pick CB-    5 Horn, Jackson, Thor, Evans, draft pick/CSN/UDFA SS-  4  Scott, More, Ramsom, Sim   Defense = 25 with 2 picks   ST = known 3+o+d = 53 roster   SO I see only room for 5-6 with factoring in UDFA pool. That tells me to trade up! Bonus the 1st+3rd gets in front of TB yucs. Then use one of the 5ths+2nd to draft another target. That's your two starters and use the 4th, 5th and 6th for the development OTs and what ever the best player are at the pick/DB. The last couple years they have added 2-3 UDFA each year, maybe the same this year too. Soooooooo Im normally 95% trade back, but above made me change my mind. I do not want to waive 5th rounder, I feel thats high with players on the bench.    ?? There's waiver claims too, they have done that each year.     
    • Big game tonight. Please send the annoying ass bandwagon New York fans home sad
×
×
  • Create New...