Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC Quarterbacks: An Average Wasteland


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think it's fair to say it is open season in the NFC.  Post-Brady & Rodgers, and the likelihood INDY and HOU are grabbing the top prospects, what are we really working against?  I'd say Hurts is the only one that would give a DC heartburn to game plan against.  It looks like a window is presenting itself with high end R1 talent all stacking up in the AFC--Mahomes, Allen, Burrow, Lawrence, Herbert, Tua, Lamar, Watson, etc.

 

NFC South

NO: Dalton? Winston? (They were BAD w/o SP)

ATL: Mariota/Ridder 

TB: Probably looking at a Jimmy G type

 

NFC North

MIN: Kirk Cousins

CHI: Justin Fields 

GB: Jordan Love 

DET: Jared Goff 

 

NFC West

AZ: Scrappy-Doo

LAR: Aged-Arm Stafford 

SEA: Geno Smith 

SF: Purdy/Lance

 

NFC East

PHI: Jalen Hurts

DAL: Dak Prescott

NYG: Daniel Jones

WAS: Sam Howell

 

That is all.  Thanks for visiting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

If I was a contender in the NFC I would be going all in on Lamar Jackson.

 

If Lamar comes to the NFC they pretty much a shoe in to the NFC Championship game.

 

 

I honestly think we make a run at him, probably give up a lot but I’d rather pay that price for him than Watson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, travisura said:

Eagles? Yes. Rest of the NFC East? Not hardly. Maaaaaaybe the Giants if they get a franchise QB.

Like it or not, the Cowboys were one of the top teams in the NFC. The Giants were decent despite being mediocre at QB. The Commanders would've been a playoff team had Ron not stuck to muh vets for as long as he did.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Like it or not, the Cowboys were one of the top teams in the NFC. The Giants were decent despite being mediocre at QB. The Commanders would've been a playoff team had Ron not stuck to muh vets for as long as he did.

 

Cowboys aren't getting over the hump with Dak, and they're hemorrhaging coaching staff. Commanders, I'll believe it when I see it. Giants seem like they truly could be a stud QB away, but are they going to acquire that this offseason? Seems doubtful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, travisura said:

Cowboys aren't getting over the hump with Dak, and they're hemorrhaging coaching staff. Commanders, I'll believe it when I see it. Giants seem like they truly could be a stud QB away, but are they going to acquire that this offseason? Seems doubtful.

I'm not saying they're getting over the hump but they're still one of the top teams in the NFC and Dak is still one if the top QBs in the NFC.

The NFC is way light on overall QB talent vs. the AFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not saying they're getting over the hump but they're still one of the top teams in the NFC and Dak is still one if the top QBs in the NFC.

The NFC is way light on overall QB talent vs. the AFC.

Yeah one of the best teams now, but I think Dak has peaked, and the Cowboys will only wane as more talent gets infused into the NFC, unless they drastically shake things up soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...