Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Go for Carr hard and save #9 pick?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, bythenbrs said:

So, you would have been a ‘no retreads’ with Delhomme?

Reality check.. Delhome wasn’t a retread.. He was a never was.. He wasn’t a starting QB for any NFL team giving a chance before Carolina.. He was the 3rd stringer on the Saints who they got from NFL Europe.. Retreads are guys who have been giving opportunities and teams have actually tried to build teams around them.. That wasn’t Delhome..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

And, at the same time you are suggesting SI, the LA Times, and several others don't know what they are talking about.  So, pick your poison.

Mark Davis is one of the least wealthy owners in the NFL, he is paying Gruden to sit on the sidelines, and would then be paying McDiptstick to join him.  Nobody knows for sure what these two contracts equate to, but Gruden was reported to be around $10M a year and McDiptstick was making $4M a year as the OC for the Pats and reported to be making "substantially more" to go to the Raiders. 

So, the guy who is somewhere between the 29th and 32nd richest owner (including the Packers who are technically owned by no one in particular), could be paying out $18-$20M a year for guys no longer coaching plus, say, another $5M to whoever would be. 

But, the problem is not simply overall wealth (which for Davis may look big to us, even though he is relatively low on the NFL totem pole), but cash flow.  How much of his non-liquid wealth is he willing to convert to liquid wealth in order to get rid of yet another coach he should not have hired in the first place?

It saved Davis money to let Carr go, while at the same time it would cost a bundle to let the HC go.  Even if he winds up paying the same money he would have paid Carr to others on the roster, it is still neutral.

Given McDipstick's history and antics as a HC, anybody suggesting having him in that position creates stability is fooling themselves. 

But, believe what and who you will.

All I can tell you is that Rappaport knows his stuff, and he hasn't given me any reason not to believe that he does not. 

A man who is broke (but estimated to be worth $500 mil) doesn't buy WNBA franchises or ultra-expensive mansions. Like Rapp Sheet said, it's about the belifef that McDaniels and the GM can right the ship. And, like it or not, part of righting the ship is dumping Carr.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Reality check.. Delhome wasn’t a retread.. He was a never was.. He wasn’t a starting QB for any NFL team giving a chance before Carolina.. He was the 3rd stringer on the Saints who they got from NFL Europe.. Retreads are guys who have been giving opportunities and teams have actually tried to build teams around them.. That wasn’t Delhome..

So you good with Brissett or Minshew? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

So you good with Brissett or Minshew? 

I'd rather have Minshew than Carr straight-up. Minshew is younger, arguably a better passer, and won't cost an arm and a leg. Similar results for a fraction of the price!

Edited by top dawg
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

So you good with Brissett or Minshew? 

As bridge QB’s while this staff develops Levi’s or Richardson?? Yes. in that situation I think you will need a bridge QB on a cheaper deal because I don’t think Levi’s or Richardson are day 1 ready and you will need a bridge QB.. If you get Stroud or Young I could see a older vet Like Flacco or Nick or Hoyer being on the roster for league minimum…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

As bridge QB’s while this staff develops Levi’s or Richardson?? Yes. in that situation I think you will need a bridge QB on a cheaper deal because I don’t think Levi’s or Richardson are day 1 ready and you will need a bridge QB.. If you get Stroud or Young I could see a older vet Like Flacco or Nick or Hoyer being on the roster for league minimum…

nodding-yes.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Ok, we are just going to disagree on this.  I ain't changing your mind and you certainly aren't changing mine.  Again, the urgency of this fan base is shading the glasses of this QB class more and more rosy.  The Burrow comparison did elicit a chuckle, I must confess.

That was our QB coach’s comparison. I would imagine he is going to have some input…

https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/10065261-cj-stroud-compared-to-joe-burrow-by-panthers-qb-coach-josh-mccown-before-nfl-draft.amp.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

As bridge QB’s while this staff develops Levi’s or Richardson?? Yes. in that situation I think you will need a bridge QB on a cheaper deal because I don’t think Levi’s or Richardson are day 1 ready and you will need a bridge QB.. If you get Stroud or Young I could see a older vet Like Flacco or Nick or Hoyer being on the roster for league minimum…

Flacco needs to retire...for real. We have McCown, we don't need Flacco on the field or off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

Flacco needs to retire...for real. We have McCown, we don't need Flacco on the field or off.

It doesn’t hurt having a vet who can teach while being a back up who can win 2 or 3 games if needed.. Mccown can still do his job but we still need a vet on the roster.. Depending on your rookie QB it will determine  what level vet you need.. 

Stroud or Young = equals older back up..

Levis = a  vet guy who can start the season and maybe 6 to 8 weeks..

Richardson and everybody else = A vet who can play the season if have to..

JMO

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

A bit of flattery there.  I get Josh is likes Stroud, but sometimes when giving praise the comparisons get a bit lofty.

image.png.9ff58c60fa0ab9ca6ab1ecf385bcfdfe.png

image.png.db664b7edf5fff9ef106afb3d5da81ad.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

It doesn’t hurt having a vet who can teach while being a back up who can win 2 or 3 games if needed.. Mccown can still do his job but we still need a vet on the roster.. Depending on your rookie QB it will determine  what level vet you need.. 

Stroud or Young = equals older back up. If either falls to pick 5

Levis = See below

Richardson and everybody else = A vet who can play the season if have to..

JMO

 

Not too far off, but the bold is how I prefer it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Not too far off, but the bold is how I prefer it.

Agree to disagree.. If you want them.. Go get them.. Don’t take any chance on not getting your guy.. We are set up to take that shot now..

Edited by WOW!!
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • THE WALKER BACKGROUND Here is where this gets weird.  Walker is a serviceable LT who could benefit from Gilbert's experience and coaching.  However, he is known for below-average run blocking and frequent penalties.  As you know, a penalty from a LT is a drive killer. A former 7th round pick, Walker has outperformed expectations, but he still ranks around the middle of the pack when compared to other tackles.  Having said that, it seems as if the Panthers are banking on Walker for a year and will then make a decision on Ickey.  In Green Bay, Walker was the starter, but the Packers weren't exactly sold on him. While most people think the oft-injured David Bakhtiari retired in 2023, he really wanted to keep playing.  He was released on March, 11, 2024.  Walker stepped in and took the reserve LT job from Nijman in that 2023 season, but they were close--probably because Nijman was more of a swing OT.  However, Nijman was a free agent in 2024, so the Panthers signed him just a week after Bakhtiari was released, leaving the Packers only Walker to play LT.  A month later, the Packers drafted a LT in the first round, Jordan Morgan out of Arizona.  Most Packer fans believe that Morgan would have beat out Walker for the LT job in 2024, but he had some shoulder injuries and went to IR after 6 games. In 2025, when the Packers had an injury at G during the season, instead of putting Morgan in at LT for Walker as planned, they played Morgan to guard because Walker can only play 1 position.  The Packers currently project Morgan back to LT for 2026, which is probably why they did not seek to retain Walker, at least in part. Based on this history, it is safe to say this: Walker is better than Nijman. We have the benefit of them being on the same team in a direct competition to help us see that. Walker is probably closer to Ickey, except for the penalties.  That bothers me a lot.  Bryce sucks when we get behind the sticks, and a run-first offense with a poor run-blocking LT is not ideal.   Regardless, I think Ickey and the Panthers find themselves in limbo right now, so the Walker deal comes at a perfect time for the GM.  Gilbert, perhaps, can work on the penalties and maybe a TE like Tremble can help offset the run blocking issues, so maybe we can actually stay the course at OT.  Maybe we do not draft a LT--maybe we draft a RT to groom behind Moton.  Maybe we draft a C.  At LT, the Panthers do not want to overreact, especially if Ickey returns to form or Walker demonstrates improvement.  Depth is certainly a concern, but a solid RT can be that depth.   I doubt the Panthers draft a LT in rounds one or maybe two.  It seems we have bigger needs at Will LB, DT, TE, and maybe S.  
    • THIS! IF we go offense at 19, it should be the trenches, which is no longer a pressing need with Waler's signing. 3 biggest needs in 2026, IMO, are DT, FS, ILB. We need to upgrade our starters at those positions and I expect anyone rafted at 19 to start immediately. I could rationalize OT (right or left) or CB since we're an injury away from a severe drop off AND have huge offseason concerns at both next year. Unless Bryce plays a lot better, I want to upgrade QB next year so I could get behind locking in a 2027 starter this year if the right guy is there. You COULD argue NCB and TE are positions where we need to upgrade our starters, sure, but not at 19. Both positions can still be upgraded on day 2.
    • He's firmly a second rounder and I don't think we would go that high for a TE this draft.  Third?  Possibly. I mean Rhule drafted Tremble in the third round who clearly was just a blocking TE.  
×
×
  • Create New...