Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Statistical Analysis of Signing Carr vs. Trading for L. Jackson


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Jimmy G has played for two of the better franchises and better coaches in recent NFL memory. Carr has played for the Raiders.

There's a reason why Carr will be the hottest veteran QB on the market this year and Jimmy G will be hoping for another opportunity to even compete for a starting job.

FTR, if the plan is to draft a QB I wouldn't hate Jimmy G as a bridge/mentor.

Carr? The "hottest veteran QB on the market?" 😛

Don't confuse the first with "the hottest." 

The only negative---which is significant I admit---that Jimmy G has in comparison to Carr is injury. He's the superior player in every other way, and their careers bare that out. 

Edited by top dawg
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Carr? The "hottest veteran QB on the market?"

Don't confuse the first with "the hottest." 

The only negative---which is significant I admit---that Jimmy G has in comparison to Carr is injury. He's the superior player in every other way, and their careers bare that out. 

Really? Most have Carr rated higher than Jimmy G. Hell Jimmy G might have to find a backup job this year unless maybe the Jets sign him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Carr? The "hottest veteran QB on the market?" 😛

Don't confuse the first with "the hottest." 

The only negative---which is significant I admit---that Jimmy G has in comparison to Carr is injury. He's the superior player in every other way, and their careers bare that out. 

You think Jimmy G is the superior QB?

Okay. We'll see what their markets bear out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Please stop mentioning Derek Carr in the same sentence as Lamar Jackson.

 

If you asking who do I want give me the MVP candidate every time who is only 26.

 

I don't care about picks we need a franchise QB that is how you win in this league. Carr isn't just had a loaded offense and Vegas and he took them nowhere. No thanks im tired of the castoff QB's every year.

 

Lamar>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Carr

I agree Lamar is a good bit better. Hell last year Carr had Adams, Walker, Renfro, and Jacobs while Jackson has Andrews and……

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I agree Lamar is a good bit better. Hell last year Carr had Adams, Walker, Renfro, and Jacobs while Jackson has Andrews and……

Carr also had the great neutralizer in Josh McDaniels and one of the worst defenses in the NFL. I'm not saying Carr is better than LJ, but you can't judge any of these QBs in a vacuum. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Please stop mentioning Derek Carr in the same sentence as Lamar Jackson.

If you asking who do I want give me the MVP candidate every time who is only 26.

I don't care about picks we need a franchise QB that is how you win in this league. Carr isn't just had a loaded offense and Vegas and he took them nowhere. No thanks im tired of the castoff QB's every year.

Lamar>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Carr

And again, the fact that you think Jackson winning an MVP four years ago negates any and all questions and criticisms about him tells me all I need to know about your level of football knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Even with lesser weapons Lamar can carry a offense better than Carr ever has.

 

It's not really even a debate who is the better QB. The debate is are you willing to pay the price to get Lamar Jackson.

 

I personally think he's worth it with this current roster. We have more talent than Baltimore on both sides of the ball. We are instant contenders the moment we trade for Lamar.

 

 

It actually is debatable. Lamar missed 4 games 2 years ago and 5 last year. You can only carry an offense if you're playing. His durability is a legitimate concern. His playing style also exposes him to more hits than a standard pocket QB increasing the possibility of getting hurt. Running QBs don't have the longevity of pocket QBs. 

Then you have to pay his salary and the huge picks/player haul to acquire him. That affects your ability to build your team as a whole. 

If you're confident giving up 3 1sts and 2nds and/or players plus 50m a year or more guaranteed multi year for a QB that has missed 1/4 of the season each of the past 2 years, that's your prerogative. I 

If Baltimore is willing to let this amazing MVP QB walk because they don't think they can build a successful team with his salary demands, it definitely begs the question, If Lamar isn't worth the salary he's demanding to his current team, what makes him worth that salary and a crippling amount of draft picks to another? Can he carry a team to multiple SBs and win with all the pieces a team will have to give up to acquire him?

And make no mistake, if we traded for LJ for that size haul, I would expect no less than 2-3 SB trips and Lombardis or else we lose the trade. Lamar is a very good player. I don't think he's so exceptional he can overcome the limitations he would place on a team. That's my prerogative. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carr and build the team instead with picks would be the second best option.

What it’d take to get Jackson I’d rather risk on an elite talent. In fact I’d consider it pretty stupid to not do this. So drafting a QB is the best option.

That’s the most logical take imo and should be plan A and B.

Plan C is keep building the team and sign whoever at QB. It sucks but this would come into play depending on Carr’s contract etc. and not being able to draft the guy due to whatever reason, because I wouldn’t want to be stuck long term with Carr, especially overpaid and also don’t really want the 4th qb in the draft at 9.

I don’t see a scenario or even a Plan D where trading the farm for Jackson and then paying him a massive contract makes any sense whatsoever. 

But then again Tepper did go after Watson so I don’t put it past him at all. Obviously Rhule’s yes man, ‘GM’ Fit isn’t going to stop him so I sure as hell hope Reich puts an end to that thought.

Edited by onmyown
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Everybody is entitled to their own opinion. If you think Carr is better than Lamar than that's your opinion.

 

I can only speak for myself and it's laughable to even compare the two. I would love to see what Lamar could do with those weapons Carr had though...

I never said Carr is better. I actually think it will be harder to build a multi year SB contender with the price LJ will cost vs Carr and elite talent picks. I'm looking at the big picture and you're focused on a single player. 

Lamar would have done great in Vegas watching his defense give up lead after lead and Josh McDaniels running a team so badly they would have fired him after one season but couldn't afford it. Imagine how bad you have to be to not even last half as long as Matt Rhule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I definitely think Lamar is better. I also know that Lamar will require a massive contract and a massive trade package to acquire. It would be the type of deal that would greatly hamper our ability to otherwise improve our roster. That's why I'm willing to consider Carr but not Lamar. If they were both FAs I'd definitely rather have Lamar.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

No im looking at a franchise QB.

 

I want one either draft or via trade.

 

What im totally against is bridge QB. 

 

Bridge QB's are just that. QB's that are good enough to get you time to go after a franchise QB. At some point we have to trade to get a franchise QB. I don't know why people don't understand this. If you want Carr just know what we are getting.

2 years from now, you have Lamar and no DJ because you couldn't pay his contract, a bunch of no name WRs and no way get them because your picks are in Baltimore and over half your cap is tied up in Moton, Burns, Horn, Ickey, Bozeman, Chinn, and LJ. The other 100m or so is going to be needed for whatever 46 players you can get. Franchise QB, same situation. 

Trading for LJ is a win it all now move and this team isn't win it all now ready. I'm not advocating for Carr. I'm just saying I think it would be harder to build a multi year SB contender than you think 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MHS831 said:

The inside source is a Raider player, and he likes Carr.  He said that some of the players are not responsive to his kind of leadership--so you are right.  He said he rubs people the wrong way--Source said--at times he is like a less offensive, watered down Russell Wilson--may have been a joke. Actually, the person who told me that was not the player but his Dad.  I think it is the religion--but not sure.  I did not throw Carr under the bus by any means...You are correct in the way Carr handled one situation very well.

No doubt, and appreciate you sharing.  Also, did not intend to come off as attacking or hostile in anyway.  That was not my intent at all...  just wanted to clarify bc I know it's hard to interpret intentions or tone through text.  Also, I meant to say "understating" not "understanding" his leadership in the original post.  Damn autocorrect.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

2 years from now, you have Lamar and no DJ because you couldn't pay his contract, a bunch of no name WRs and no way get them because your picks are in Baltimore and over half your cap is tied up in Moton, Burns, Horn, Ickey, Bozeman, Chinn, and LJ. The other 100m or so is going to be needed for whatever 46 players you can get. Franchise QB, same situation. 

Trading for LJ is a win it all now move and this team isn't win it all now ready. I'm not advocating for Carr. I'm just saying I think it would be harder to build a multi year SB contender than you think 

He doesn't get it.

He thinks having Jackson means you automatically win it all, even though that hasn't happened in Baltimore either.

Basically, he just wants Jackson here and no amount of real world logic or thinking will deter him.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exhibit A of why Woods was cut....   Trying to shoulder knockdown the best WR in the NFL ends up with air   Also not sure what the h*ll coverage Horn was playing but covering nothibg after a poo jam 
    • I'm just telling you what the team is currently looking at. Aho, Jarvis, Staal, KK as the four centers in that order as of right now.  Obviously id prefer them to go get McTavish but the asking price is pretty damn high. 
    • Summary Austin Corbett being named a starter already might be strategic because it allows the team to have Cade Mays compete to play LG if Damien Lewis continues to have shoulder issues going into the season. Brady Christensen is most valuable to the team as the sixth-man/swing tackle for the OL and having him start a game at guard only to have to kick out to tackle (should there be an injury) is less than ideal. Was the weakest link on the OL when he was the starting LG and though he has short arms he is too athletic and so good in space that playing him at tackle is better. RT makes more sense as it's brawn-on-brawn more than it is on the weakside where somebody like Princely Umanmielen can out-athletic him. Cade Mays provides similar versatility that Christensen does, but can stick to the interior while Brady stays on the outside (unless, Lord forbid, there's multiple injuries that requires Mays + Christensen on the interior and Nijman to takeover at OT). Kaye thinks that the only keep two QBs on the roster and while he's seen some of the angst that Andy Dalton caused from the preseason opener but through the first two weeks of training camp he looked like he could be in the conversation if there was a competition for QB1. Not because of any lacking one Bryce's behalf, but just based on the great looks he's given the second-team defense. He's lofted balls into the endzone including a big TD to Coker. Also threw about 45yds through the air to TJ Luther for a TD. Zietlow empathizes with the fans because they can't see anything from training camp. Mike has the team keeping three RBs with Raheem Blackshear as the odd-man out with Etienne set to take over as one of the two returners. Former Ragin' Cajun and Horned Frog Emani Bailey has looked good running the ball in the last couple of practices as well as during the preseason opener. Likely priority practice squad candidate. Thinks that the team should only keep six WRs in order to take an extra OL or DL into the season, but summoning his inner Eric Eager Kaye doesn't see how they justify not keeping seven WRs without a trade. Doesn't think if it's a failure if a trade can't come to fruition to move that seventh WR if they do that. Loves what he's seeing out of McMillan, Coker, and Legette. TMac is starting to surge and Jimmy Horn Jr might be the lead punt returner. With the team being so light on quality special teams players, David Moore might be somebody that they can cut and bring back. All of the WRs further down the roster are also making plays (lists Tremayne, Luther, and George). Alex likes their initial numbers: two QBs, three RBs, and seven WRs. Mike points out that with seven WRs there's no way the team takes four TEs. Will Tremble be healthy and if not who makes the roster while he recovers? James Mitchell has looked good and like it might be him if that's the route. Poses the question of do they take 10 OL? Probably going to have eight active on game day but with DLew's injury, TMo's history, Hunt getting dinged up recently in practice, Corbett's back-to-back season ending injuries creates a legitimate conversation about whether or not they go into the season with ten OL and then try to stash one on the practice squad afterwards. Couple of minutes of debate over the classification of the word hero... Don't have LaBryan Ray, Shy Tuttle, nor Akayleb Evans on their final 53. Quick intermission as they bring on The Houston Chronicle's Jonathan Alexander (formerly of The Charlotte Observer where he was once the Panthers' beat reporter). JA thinks that some of the critique of CJ's game last season was overblown but also understands that folks want to see growth from year one to year two rather than regression but he still had some good moments. Still had a decent TD:INT ratio (20:12) and was listed at #39 in the recent NFL Top 100. Texans were dealing with a lot of injuries early in the summer: Joe Mixon has a foot issue from an off-field injury, Nick Chubb is returning from a season ending injury and recently came back from a concussion as well, Dameon Pierce who is coming back from a quad injury and just recently practiced in full for the first time, Dare Ogunbowale is their do-it-all guy (including emergency kicker), and they drafted Woody Marks out of USC in the 4th round of the 2025 draft. The team might even try to sneak five RBs on to the roster. Chubb isn't a guarantee to make the roster with how much they like Pierce, Dare, and recently invested a 4th in Marks. Talked issues in the secondary after CJGJ's injury and Jimmie Ward's felony assault charge. CJGJ injury was really tough even though he'll come back at some point during the season. Stingley and Lassiter provides them with two lockdown outside CBs. Kaylin Bulock is a ball hawk that struggles in the run game but Jaylen Petri is one of the best hitters/blitzers at the nickel position in the league (though he gives up some in the pass game). They're still going to be strong in the secondary even without CJGJ. DL is one of the best in the league. Will Anderson Jr and Danielle Hunter on the outside with a deeper DT room. DL + secondary are the strongest areas of the defense. Houston WR room has a lot of names that even casual football fans know of (Nico Collins, Christian Kirk, Tank Dell, John Metchie III, Braxton Berrios, both of the Iowa State WRs, etc). Main four are Collins, Kirk, Higgins (Iowa St), and Noel (Iowa St). Open competition for the remaining two to three spots depending on what Berrios has done since coming back from injury. If Berrios is good to go, they could keep seven. John Metchie III, Xavier Hutchinson (a former Iowa St WR himself), and Justin Watson (former Chief) are all competing for those remaining spots with Berrios. Rookie contract guarantees have been getting deeper and deeper every year, so when Higgins was drafted the Texans didn't want to deal with the back-and-forth so they just guaranteed the full deal. Asked about what the external view of Bryce Young is outside of the Carolinas. Jonathan says that the league respects Bryce and the Texans do especially. CJ and him are close, Will Anderson is close with Bryce, Henry Too'too is close with Bryce, Metchie is close with Bryce. Whenever they're asked about him they show nothing but love, including saying that he was going to turn things around in Carolina. Folks around the organization and others outside of Carolina around the league feel like the Panthers didn't put the necessary tools around Bryce in his rookie season. They gave him the tools in his second season, but it was all about his confidence then. They think he's going to be one of the better QBs in the league for a long time. End of Jonathan's segment. Back to just Mike and Alex. Roster bets! Can't be guys that you know are going to be on the roster or win jobs. Outside of the kicker competition there isn't too many positions up in the air. Of the guys in the 45 - 55 range, stake their claim on who they think will make the roster. MK starts with Jaden Crumedy, last year's sixth-round pick. Likes what he's been doing in the run game, feels like he complements DB well. A'Shawn Robinson is complemented by Turk Wharton and Bobby Brown III is complemented by Cam Jackson. AZ points out how Crumedy played in five different defensive schemes in college. AZ goes with Ja'Tyre Carter. He had a solid rest of the game after giving up his initial sack which wasn't exactly egregious. This training camp has shown how important OL depth is and with how much has been invested they're going to want to make sure to keep the strength a strength (especially with three of the five starters already dinged up). Could make the roster as OL10. He's serviceable and part of a group that needs as much depth as possible, so sees the logic in keeping him. MK's next pick... Thomas Incoom. He's been terrific at practice on defense and was solid against the Browns on special teams. Doesn't see why DJ Johnson would be kept over Incoom as the latter is a better pass rusher and a much, much better ST contributor (doesn't hurt that he's outperformed DJ Johnson in every which way). Pointed out a play where DJ Johnson froze up on a reverse when he's supposed to be a good run defender. They've put a lot in and while Evero was pro-DJ Johnson, he was ultimately a selection of the previous regime. Pointed out Brandt Tillis' comments about not cutting Turk Wharton because it would lose the team trying to stash him rather than fielding the best 53 players. Morgan + Tillis don't benefit from storing a player that they didn't draft, and Incoom brings so much on special teams while also providing a pass rush despite needing to improve against the run. AZ's pick... Nick Scott. Both agree that he's a special teamer and a back-up, but Scott also brings a legitimate leadership quality to the team that's well-liked by everybody. Both agree that Ransom and Richardson deserve reps over Nick Scott, but he provides a great locker room presence that benefits the team. If he can be the defense's version of David Moore then he provides even more value than he does as a starter. Ransom has been one of the best defensive players in camp and Richardson showed that he is a very capable defensive player at safety. End.
×
×
  • Create New...