Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mock draft from April of last year


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

For those of you that put a lot of stock in mock drafts. This is from Chad Reuter at NFL Network 1 week before the draft. 
 

He has 5 QBs going in the 1st round.

Pick 2: Kenny Pickett

Pick 8: Malik Willis

Pick 12: Matt Corral

Pick 16: Desmond Ridder

Pick 32: Sam Howell

This is how they actually went:

Pick 20: Kenny Pickett

Pick 74: Desmond Ridder

Pick 86: Malik Willis

Pick 94: Matt Corral

Pick 137: Bailey Zappe

Pick 144: Sam Howell

EAFD1F25-21F4-405F-ADF2-9538AF7C2AA3.jpeg

881B5BBE-F086-4D02-BE4F-197934711658.jpeg

BE65D1DF-FACD-4FBD-8B3C-7D30E60C1B01.jpeg

3C47521F-A415-4D37-BC83-2661499FA88D.jpeg

37C7A53C-C947-4F09-A2BC-4DC06472FA5B.jpeg

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-2020-nfl-mock-draft-4-0-bucs-pick-jerry-jeudy-0ap3000001110524

https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-2021-nfl-mock-draft-4-0-broncos-patriots-trade-up-for-qbs

The 2022 class sucked. This year I wouldn't be surprised if it's only Young and Stroud in the 1st. Corral got put in a shitty situation so even him being 1st on a lot peoples boards last year could still be true for that class if he ever gets a chance 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-2020-nfl-mock-draft-4-0-bucs-pick-jerry-jeudy-0ap3000001110524

https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-2021-nfl-mock-draft-4-0-broncos-patriots-trade-up-for-qbs

The 2022 class sucked. This year I wouldn't be surprised if it's only Young and Stroud in the 1st. Corral got put in a shitty situation so even him being 1st on a lot peoples boards last year could still be true for that class if he ever gets a chance 

Levis will go top 10. AR-15 will likely go first round too, but teams know they are going to have to be patient with him, so where he goes is iffy.  Not many teams have the luxury of waiting for rookies to develop.  Heck, the Jets are jettisoning Wilson just after two seasons.  Young and Stroud are plug/play.  Levis could be too, but should sit a year.  Richardson will bomb if he plays right away.  I think most teams realizes he needs to sit.  Again, not many teams can afford to draft a first round QB and sit him.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Levis will go top 10. AR-15 will likely go first round too, but teams know they are going to have to be patient with him, so where he goes is iffy.  Not many teams have the luxury of waiting for rookies to develop.  Heck, the Jets are jettisoning Wilson just after two seasons.  Young and Stroud are plug/play.  Levis could be too, but should sit a year.  Richardson will bomb if he plays right away.  I think most teams realizes he needs to sit.  Again, not many teams can afford to draft a first round QB and sit him.

I'm fine with anything besides wasting a top 10 pick on Levis

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

I'm fine with anything besides wasting a top 10 pick on Levis

I'm actually on the 2024 train.  We can't/won't get Young or Stround and the next two have HUGE question marks.  Solidify the roster at other positions this year, get the bridge QB and draft the QB of the future next draft.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

I'm actually on the 2024 train.  We can't/won't get Young or Stround and the next two have HUGE question marks.  Solidify the roster at other positions this year, get the bridge QB and draft the QB of the future next draft.

Yeah I'd rather throw a 2nd at Hooker than Levis or AR in the 1st. Worst case scenario you have a solid backup for 4 years

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah I'd rather throw a 2nd at Hooker than Levis or AR in the 1st. Worst case scenario you have a solid backup for 4 years

Agreed on Hooker.  Next draft is shaping up to be a doozy. The underclassmsn are boss and a TON of SR/RSR/GR QBs that are out of eligiblity.  There's about 6 guys that were coming out this draft that stayed/transferred that are all coming out on top of all the others that will be declaring too.  Some underclassmen will stay, still, it will be the draft to snag a QB.  Granted we will miss out on Williams and Maye (if he declares) but still prime pickings should remain beyond that.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I'm actually on the 2024 train.  We can't/won't get Young or Stround and the next two have HUGE question marks.  Solidify the roster at other positions this year, get the bridge QB and draft the QB of the future next draft.

wash, rinse, repeat...

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Stumpy said:

wash, rinse, repeat...

Are you ready for “I'm actually on the 2025 train.  We can't/won't get Maye or Caleb Williams and the next two have HUGE question marks.  Solidify the roster at other positions this year, get the bridge QB and draft the QB of the future next draft.”

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, 45catfan said:

I'm actually on the 2024 train.  We can't/won't get Young or Stround and the next two have HUGE question marks.  Solidify the roster at other positions this year, get the bridge QB and draft the QB of the future next draft.

Watch next year everyone will be saying none of those QBs will be worth trading up. Also we will have to trade up because unless the wheel really fall off we are not getting another top 10 pick. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Stumpy said:

wash, rinse, repeat...

Still find it weird people think we are gonna be in a position to get a QB of the future in 2024 or that all the QBs in a supposedly good draft are gonna all be worth trading up for in the eyes of the Huddle.

I said it before. It will be like it is every year. Bunch of QB hype before the college season. Then all but maybe one or two are gonna be worth potential trading up and the QB needy teams won’t want to trade down. 
But more that likely none will be worth trading up at all in the Huddles eyes. 

College QB Hype>College Season Starts>Hype for QBs goes Down>None are worth getting in the first round>Maybe next year is the year>Repeat. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Kaye was on the Locked on Panthers podcast talking about just such an issue.  He was saying that even Richardson could be gone by 5.  I laughed.  Like really hard.  Who in their right mind is going to go all in on Rookies QBs in the top 5?  This class??? hahahahaha!

Then you think about the general trends in the NFL.  If you like a guy, you go get them.  Like with what KC and Buffalo did.  Like what the 49ers did with Lance (which who knows if they got that right!).  Not everyone can fail into the #1 pick.  That requires a fair amount of bad luck to be that putrid.  Sometimes you have to make some big moves to get the guy who will push you over the hump.

I'm not opposed to trading up for the guy the staff thinks they can get the right guy to lead the team for the next 10 years of success.  I also don't think everyone is going to be breaking down the doors for these QBs.  As we've seen, each pick is risky AF, and more often than not, it comes down to staff just as much as the player.

I have no idea what's going to happen.  It's going to be an interesting time as we see how the draft landscape changes and what moves the Panthers and other teams make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...