Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adam Schefter: Bryce Young is believed to be favorite for #1 for the Panthers right now


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Hogan said:

I can't give you chapter and verse but I do remember his 2021 injury was hamstring while he was running the ball. Had nothing to do with size and being hit. Anyone else remember CMC being "knocked out" of a game?

It didn’t happen…we were losing and there was no reason to play him.  We would not be in this position if he played late meaningless games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

Im on record saying Bryce is the best QB in this draft.

 

His size is the only reason im worried. If this dude was a legit 6'3 he is probably considered a generational prospect. He has that kind of talent. Look at what he did with that weak cast of WR's at Alabama. The dude just knows how to play QB.

 

Size is my only concern.

Your opinion is pretty much the consensus.  I can’t pass on him personally 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope we get CJ. I like his accuracy and throwing motion. He has great footwork and really squares up to throw a great catchable ball. Almost all the videos I see have him throwing dimes and in stride with his receivers, Bryce looks good as well but some of his are slightly under thrown and footwork will need some help. Stroud would be my pick. He just throws a great ball to me.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ncsfinest21 said:

The conversation was about size and not about competition and records. 

You can't talk to these dudes they can't see past Bryce's entire manhood in their mouth at all times. If you aren't comparing him to the current best or hall of famers you don't know what you're talking about. Yet the other top QB under consideration for the first pick is basically destined to be mediocre at best because they know so.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GOAT said:

you're comparing their size, not their skillset, competition, or success.

like the important stuff you know?

what does skillset, competition or success have to do with getting injured and wasting all those picks because the QB isnt durable because he is small.

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

He might be. The real deal wins the ACC. That conference was weak and he did struggle towards the end of the season.

 

I would have liked to see him transfer to Alabama and see what he looks like vs a real defense.

My guess is you didn't watch any UNC games. I watched every one. Without him, they would have been 3-9. The games they won, he virtually won singlehandedly. Their defense was the single worst defense I have seen in my 60 years of watching football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncsfinest21 said:

what does skillset, competition or success have to do with getting injured and wasting all those picks because the QB isnt durable because he is small.

So…lets take AR because he is bigger, stronger, faster.  Forget playing the position.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...