Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Glass half full thread for you miserable fugs. ITS DRAFT WEEK!!!!


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Al Pacino GIF

I'll say THIS. IF you Brycers could actually say S2 scores cancel out because they're both very good, both AR AND Youngster, when comparing "the mental aspect" you guys go ga ga over IF they are then equal aside from a STAR program, coach, receivers, playing time, stability, WHAT exactly does Bryce have over AR-15?!

You bringing a 9 to a rifle fight.

Idk, maybe like completions?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Al Pacino GIF

I'll say THIS. IF you Brycers could actually say S2 scores cancel out because they're both very good, both AR AND Youngster, when comparing "the mental aspect" you guys go ga ga over IF they are then equal aside from a STAR program, coach, receivers, playing time, stability, WHAT exactly does Bryce have over AR-15?!

You bringing a 9 to a rifle fight.

No. Don't run. Show me the stats that the smaller QB gets hurt more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Doesn't matter. He was here two days and TD said they are enamoured with him.

I'll sleep well. You Brycers can stay up with your little man complexes.

LOL! Says the guy with the "tall guy" complex. 

Your life is what it is champ. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/22/2023 at 1:10 PM, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I take exception to the nonsense that Byron Bell was disappointing.  The fact the franchise had to put him in the position of playing starter roles is the disappointment. When I look back on Bell I think he made the most of his time in the NFL.  Undrafted and played about 7ish seasons.  Dude should have been a good go-to bottom of the roster rotation guy and should never have been a starter.  That was not his fault. 

So as far as the glass half full goes, my cup runneth over for Byron Bell's football career.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/22/2023 at 1:10 PM, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I take exception to the nonsense that Byron Bell was disappointing.  The fact the franchise had to put him in the position of playing starter roles is the disappointment. When I look back on Bell I think he made the most of his time in the NFL.  Undrafted and played about 7ish seasons.  Dude should have been a good go-to bottom of the roster rotation guy and should never have been a starter.  That was not his fault. 

So as far as the glass half full goes, my cup runneth over for Byron Bell's football career.

Guy is a millionaire after his seven years (If he invested his money wisely), still relatively young without any major injuries....say he did okay for himself with the opportunities he was given.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/22/2023 at 1:10 PM, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I take exception to the nonsense that Byron Bell was disappointing.  The fact the franchise had to put him in the position of playing starter roles is the disappointment. When I look back on Bell I think he made the most of his time in the NFL.  Undrafted and played about 7ish seasons.  Dude should have been a good go-to bottom of the roster rotation guy and should never have been a starter.  That was not his fault. 

So as far as the glass half full goes, my cup runneth over for Byron Bell's football career.

Guy is a millionaire after his seven years (If he invested his money wisely), still relatively young without any major injuries....say he did okay for himself with the opportunities he was given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/22/2023 at 1:10 PM, Pejorative Miscreant said:

I take exception to the nonsense that Byron Bell was disappointing.  The fact the franchise had to put him in the position of playing starter roles is the disappointment. When I look back on Bell I think he made the most of his time in the NFL.  Undrafted and played about 7ish seasons.  Dude should have been a good go-to bottom of the roster rotation guy and should never have been a starter.  That was not his fault. 

So as far as the glass half full goes, my cup runneth over for Byron Bell's football career.

Guy is a millionaire after his seven years (If he invested his money wisely), still relatively young without any major injuries....say he did okay for himself with the opportunities he was given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...