Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlotte Considering Offer Sheet For Grant Williams


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

Seems like Bridges doesn't wanna play with his buddy Lamelo now. Kinda weird to me, but w.e. sign and trade him, f it. Same with PJ if he doesn't want to be here either. 

I would love to sign and trade Bridges. Gets us some value without having him on our roster. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now with the rumor of Bridges and Pascal  on the block, anybody want to trade with Toronto?  1st rd pick, Terry(since they lost Fleet) and Pj for Pascal?  We could have a lineup of Melo, Miller Miles Pascal Mark or Melo Miller Williams Bridges  Mark. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Lurk21 said:

Now with the rumor of Bridges and Pascal  on the block, anybody want to trade with Toronto?  1st rd pick, Terry(since they lost Fleet) and Pj for Pascal?  We could have a lineup of Melo, Miller Miles Pascal Mark or Melo Miller Williams Bridges  Mark. 

Toronto can do better than that for Pascal…way better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This needs to happen followed by Rozier being traded for more depth. A young core of Melo, Miller, and Williams could develop nicely with Grant Williams helping set the tone. Melo, Melo, G Williams, Bridges, and Williams could be a decent starting lineup with Hayward playing the 6th man role. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...