Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

O-Line updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

He's not any better that what we have now. Age has caught up to him.  I hear Greg Little is available. 

Awkward Season 4 GIF by The Office

 

12 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

There has to be a reason he is still not playing? Money? Injury? Lost that lovin feeling? 

I heard it was a salary cap move to cut him.  I have no idea how much he has left in the tank…

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

 

I heard it was a salary cap move to cut him.  I have no idea how much he has left in the tank…

To be honest I really do not why he is not signed yet. I do know that what little I saw him play since he left here he wasn't good. It was kinda ugly to tell the truth. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

 

I heard it was a salary cap move to cut him.  I have no idea how much he has left in the tank…

 

Not gonna lie. Norwell is the only Guard I haven't heard much about lately. It would be nice to know what's going on cuz he is the only guard I'd even contemplate bringing aboard.

 

Although I am in the we don't need a Guard just yet group. IMO, we need to let the youngins get their shot fist. Then if it doesn't work out, we can go after Norwell. If he's still around that is.

 

Of course, I'm of the mind that preseason is for evaluation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

To be honest I really do not why he is not signed yet. I do know that what little I saw him play since he left here he wasn't good. It was kinda ugly to tell the truth. 

 

Yeah, I think that's the reason Jax let him go, not sure why Wash let him go. Thought he had a pretty good year last year. What's up with that?

Edited by Gerry Green
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jb2288 said:

Zero concerns on tackle, those 2 are proven 1 preseason game means nothing for them. Now the swing tackle/backup is an issue but hopefully they never see the field 

This is my concern because our stud LT and RT looked like they were just going through the motions and let our franchise QB get clobbered several times.  Ickey and Moton should be setting an example versus mailing it in and I know it is just a preseason game but Bryce can still get hurt.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...