Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This may not be thread worthy but…


The Question
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think we should be very excited about Jamie Robinson. After watching film…

-Impeccable tackler

-Hard hitter

- PERFECT timing with hits in pass coverage, he is great at laying the wood at the exact right time to cause incompletions 

- High energy

- Good at jumping snaps and knowing where to be when and how to get to the ball.

 

He reminds me of a Jeremy Chinn without being liability in coverage, and that’s no disrespect to Chinn but I’d rather have him close to the line in the box. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s wild that some people here have said the opposite and wanted him cut. 
 

Not that their take is wild, just wild that two people can watch the same player, with one loving what they see, and the other thinking he’s trash. 
 

I liked what I’ve seen so far. He has a compact heaviness when he tackles somebody. Some might call it “having that dawg in him.”

 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw nothing from him in preseason to be excited about. In some instances I saw a worse version of what I saw at South Carolina. Liability in coverage (huge TD he lost tracking on before half against Lions) and lost in run support (embarrassing effort against Jets where Smith was trashing him on the broadcast).

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, RenoCarolina said:

not to be that guy but his name is Jammie

Coaches had to be impressed because we let some good guys go.

I knew it was Jammie and even stuck it in my head and still messed up haha. Alas, with research I’m kinda pumped about Stephen Sullivan, and if Derek Wright made the 53 they must like him. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Question said:

It’s just opinions man, I could be completely wrong but I just like what I see in his college stuff. He seems like he’s got grit and smart. What more can you ask for?

I’m not a Corral hater. I like the dude and want him to do well. I think he was terrible in the first preseason game (not all on him though) but he’s gotten a bit better since. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

I’m not a Corral hater. I like the dude and want him to do well. I think he was terrible in the first preseason game (not all on him though) but he’s gotten a bit better since. 

i would love to be wrong about jammie. right now i think he is trash. if he shows out this season i'll think he is eric weddle 2.0

 

that's the beauty of being a fan

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...