Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Video a lot of us need to Watch


SaltAndPepper
 Share

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, SaltAndPepper said:

PFF's Trevor Sikkema talks about how we as fan should temper our expectations. We need to understand we're just not a good football team, and that the goal this season is that Bryce understands what he's doing wrong, and how to improve. 

This will all be worth it in 2025 (I hope)

2025   LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL  ::takes breath::  LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

Bs.

We were just laughing a season ago about the Saints aging roster, how the Falcons were in disarray and once Tom Brady retires, the division should be Panthers. 

No all of a sudden we've got the worst roster. 

There's nobody on the Saints Dline I would take over Brian Burns or Derek Brown. Old man Cameron Jordan give me a break. 

Luvu and Shaq (before injury) were as formidable of Lb duo as there is in the NFC South.

Our secondary (before injury) was the best.

Offensively Sanders and Hubbard are a decent backfield, Who is Baker Mayfield handing it off to?

Who was Derek Carr's Rb Monday night?

The only question marks are at Wr, Qb and the coaching staff. 

And right now it's looking like the Saints have the best combo of head coach and Qb in the NFC south.

 

First off, I point out that unrealistic expectations aren't the team's fault.

The other side of that though is that with an entirely new staff, you had to retool the roster in order to suit the scheme changes. That's one reason why prior draftees might not stick around, basically the things they would drafted to do are things were not doing anymore.

That doesn't mean the roster is sh-t, but it does mean it might have taken a (necessary) step back.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

2025? We traded all that for a super processing, super NFL ready, physically limited QB to shoot for 2025?

Oh wee mayne.

I know everybody hates talking about waiting after Matt Rhule's 7 year plan bullsh-t , but three year plans are pretty normal for a new staff, with step one of that process being the acquisition of the quarterback you want to build around.

Worked pretty well for Cincinnati...

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

First off, I point out that unrealistic expectations aren't the team's fault.

The other side of that though is that with an entirely new staff, you had to retool the roster in order to suit the scheme changes. That's one reason why prior draftees might not stick around, basically the things they would drafted to do are things were not doing anymore.

That doesn't mean the roster is sh-t, but it does mean it might have taken a (necessary) step back.

Bro it’s totally the teams fault.  How in the hell can you state otherwise?

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

First off, I point out that unrealistic expectations aren't the team's fault.

The other side of that though is that with an entirely new staff, you had to retool the roster in order to suit the scheme changes. That's one reason why prior draftees might not stick around, basically the things they would drafted to do are things were not doing anymore.

That doesn't mean the roster is sh-t, but it does mean it might have taken a (necessary) step back.

What's unrealistic about competing in what many considered to be a weak division.

If the Saints and Falcons can make moves to improve in the off-season, it's "unrealistic" for Panther fans to want the same. 

"Taken a step back"

Losing Dj Moore?

Foreman?

Where have we taken a step back at?

Edited by Pantherxtreme
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

They talked playoffs from the moment they drafted Bryce

Don't recall anything of that sort, but it wouldn't matter if they did. Coaches are never going to talk about being big losers.

A pretty good portion of us understood what this year was going to be and said so when people were acting like this year was going to be the start of a dynasty.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're saying the same thing as I said.  Until Jordan becomes an active part of recruiting and funding, this school will continue to fall way behind.  But to say Michael Jordan or the Jordan brand doesn't matter anymore, which is what you said, is flat out wrong.  
    • I have not learnt my lesson and will always want Uber athletic profiles. Sorry, Im a whore about it.... Im not the right guy to defend Kenyon, I just have a understanding with this years draft, numbers, and panthers roster. He is more of "upside/project" and we are talking 19th pick here too.  I know about the years of all the mock drafts with TEs in them and I did want Pitts too.... Look I love the current TEs on the roster too, just this guy should be better than any of them at their best.  Right now I feel OT is the correct target, but panthers as a org are trying to win in 2026 than 2027. So tea leaves and all, Kenyon would help this year. You can even say flex him to slot for most of the snaps and think of tmac on smoke routes with Kenyon blocking for him. I just hate BY is the shooter..... warren, I would say he's the better prospect even without his rookie year, *but he was late bloomer like XL if Im right, plus age was 25ish?? Bears picked love above him, mainly cause of recs.  You can make a case that Kenyon is not a TE, but a moving weapon for offense that can be in the backfield, on the LOS, slot, and even X.... imean he's got XLs combine on some numbers.... He would be better to a offense mad scientist type...is that Dave? or is that bevell?? I think the Panthers should have him as a 19 pick, with others... 
    • That's one of the best power play games I've seen us have in a while.
×
×
  • Create New...