Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 3 Panthers News


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

I remember... and I'm hoping things change from the play calling standpoint in all honesty. 

Take advantage of what could be a pretty banged up team. Get some confidence back in the players heads. 

I didn't expect much from this team to start with this season. It seems like it might be longer than I expected. But MAN... the fact that it's week 2 and 2/3 of the fanbase if blowing up the team already is just frustrating. 

Can't wait to see the game Sunday tho. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PanthersAlv said:

I remember... and I'm hoping things change from the play calling standpoint in all honesty. 

Take advantage of what could be a pretty banged up team. Get some confidence back in the players heads. 

I didn't expect much from this team to start with this season. It seems like it might be longer than I expected. But MAN... the fact that it's week 2 and 2/3 of the fanbase if blowing up the team already is just frustrating. 

Can't wait to see the game Sunday tho. 

Same, looking forward to the day Reich hands over the play calling to Brown and always look forward to Panthers football on Sundays. Other fans losing their minds doesn't affect me. I don't understand the misery pron of constant whining. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ghostface Chilla said:

Same, looking forward to the day Reich hands over the play calling to Brown and always look forward to Panthers football on Sundays. Other fans losing their minds doesn't affect me. I don't understand the misery pron of constant whining. 

Said it elsewhere, but you've got some people who panic at the first sign of things being tough.

Others love the drama and attention they get when things are bad, so they jump in early in the hope that they can tell everybody how smart they were if it stays bad later.

That kind of bullsh-t doesn't interest me.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Mr. Scot I haven't looked deep into rosters in awhile, but, that's 5 defensive injuries for them. If they are even a little banged up and still play, that should give a little advantage, especially the longer they play, shouldn't it?  Especially if the Panthers can put together a few drives. (Tho that's really all we are hoping for) lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PanthersAlv said:

@Mr. Scot I haven't looked deep into rosters in awhile, but, that's 5 defensive injuries for them. If they are even a little banged up and still play, that should give a little advantage, especially the longer they play, shouldn't it?  Especially if the Panthers can put together a few drives. (Tho that's really all we are hoping for) lol 

Would likely depend on their depth (which I won't blame to be up on).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

If Andy Dalton is starting I'm taking the week off. I'm not watching that trash and I don't care if he throws for 300 yards and 4 tuddies...in fact, that would make it even worse...I'm not ready for that. 

but...it's still Andy Dalton.

Dalton gonna start and throw for 300 yards and 2 TDS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...