Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football - Week 5


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, Shocker said:

No offense but I’m not sold he is a first rounder.  Doubt it…lacks size doesn’t have very good athleticism either.  He is a good passer so he could be good on a good team.

He is basically the same size as Hartmann and similar skill set

His arm is significantly better than Hartman and he’s 6’2 195. Wouldn’t take much effort to hit 210. And it’s not just me. There’s sites suggesting he could push for QB3 in this class after Williams and Maye. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Varking said:

His arm is significantly better than Hartman and he’s 6’2 195. Wouldn’t take much effort to hit 210. And it’s not just me. There’s sites suggesting he could push for QB3 in this class after Williams and Maye. 

Might happen…takes 1 team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

Might happen…takes 1 team

The idea would be a team in the middle to back half of the first round takes him where he can sit a year to learn an offense and then he can play for an actual good team vs joining a poo team and having to carry the franchise. That’s his path to success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Varking said:

The idea would be a team in the middle to back half of the first round takes him where he can sit a year to learn an offense and then he can play for an actual good team vs joining a poo team and having to carry the franchise. That’s his path to success. 

Agree there, he is a good distributor to weapons and very quick release.  I like him as a thrower.  I mean he is really young so lots of growing room

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Duke is gonna be a top 10 ranked team if they pull this off.lol

I don’t think so. I think they’ll be close. But Notre Dame just took an L, this will be 2 in a row and they are 11 now. I’d guess they move up to 12 or 13. Only #10 lost so far, and this would be 11. Would be hard to move them all the way up over a VERY tight win against #11. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Varking said:

His arm is significantly better than Hartman and he’s 6’2 195. Wouldn’t take much effort to hit 210. And it’s not just me. There’s sites suggesting he could push for QB3 in this class after Williams and Maye. 

Ewers arm is way better than Hartman's. There's a reason why the guy was the #1 QB recruit in the nation. He and Klubnik are both struggling to show that ranking translating but they both show flashes. Hartman is a very good college QB but I don't think he's an NFL QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is interesting how the games changed over the past 10-15 years. I mainly started watching football in like 2010 or so. I feel like every week there were QBs throwing for 400+, 300 yards was a pedestrian day it felt like. Now even the best qbs dont throw for 300 super often it feels.
    • I dont necessarily disagree just really curious as to why that is?  He either must be a dunce, a bad teammate or must be horrendous in practice because I thought he showed promise at least in his 2nd year
    • Its AI but here goes nothing:   Trevor Lawrence's catchable ball statistics vary by situation, with his highest rate being 74.1%74.1 % 74.1% in a clean pocket and his lowest on deep balls at 41.2%41.2 % 41.2% . When pressured, his catchable pass rate is 51.6%51.6 % 51.6% , and it's 55.2%55.2 % 55.2% on play-action plays. Lawrence has also been impacted by a high receiver drop rate, which makes it appear as if he is more inaccurate than he is.  Catchable pass rate by situation  Clean pocket: 74.1%74.1 % 74.1% (ranks 28th out of 32 quarterbacks) Deep balls: 41.2%41.2 % 41.2% (ranks 23rd out of 32 quarterbacks) When pressured: 51.6%51.6 % 51.6% (ranks 15th out of 32 quarterbacks) On play action: 55.2%55.2 % 55.2% (ranks 28th out of 32 quarterbacks) Red zone: 65.1%65.1 % 65.1% (ranks 15th out of 32 quarterbacks) When blitzed: 69.2%69.2 % 69.2% (ranks 19th out of 32 quarterbacks)    Compared to:   Bryce Young's catchable ball stats vary by situation, with a high catchable pass rate of 73.2%73.2 % 73.2% in a clean pocket (30th in the NFL) and a 60%60 % 60% rate on deep throws (20+ air yards), which was 10th in the NFL in 2024. However, his pressured and blitzed catchable rates were lower at 39.7%39.7 % 39.7% (31st) and 60.3%60.3 % 60.3% (29th), respectively.  By situation  Clean pocket: 73.2%73.2 % 73.2% catchable pass rate (30th in NFL) Deep ball (20+ air yards): 60%60 % 60% catchable pass rate (10th in NFL in 2024) Pressure: 39.7%39.7 % 39.7% catchable pass rate (31st in NFL) Blitzed: 60.3%60.3 % 60.3% catchable pass rate (29th in NFL) Red zone: 62.5%62.5 % 62.5% catchable pass rate (22nd in NFL) 
×
×
  • Create New...