Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schefter: Cowher Unlikely to Coach in 2010


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

lets wait till next week and revisit this topic.

That's what I'm saying though, lol. Last week he was gung ho ready to go in 2010 when it looked like Fox was gone. Then the report came out that he would be brought back, now Cowher isn't coming back this year.

It's clear he's waiting for this job. So, like you said, we'll see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see fox stay, he's a good coach, and he him and cowher both build teams around defenses... He has built this team the way he wants it and gotten drafted the players that best fit with his scheme bring cowher in here whats to say he doesnt come in here and clean house? They you take a few years to rebuild by getting the player cowher wants in his scheme... I dont know about ya'll but I'm ready for a championship with the panthers and with they way the team came together at the end despite injuries... I think we are on that path for next season!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see fox stay, he's a good coach, and he him and cowher both build teams around defenses... He has built this team the way he wants it and gotten drafted the players that best fit with his scheme bring cowher in here whats to say he doesnt come in here and clean house? They you take a few years to rebuild by getting the player cowher wants in his scheme... I dont know about ya'll but I'm ready for a championship with the panthers and with they way the team came together at the end despite injuries... I think we are on that path for next season!!

I know everyone is hyped over the last few games, I am too! But, given that, who's to say we don't need a little house cleaning? Even in years with few injuries and these core players we still haven't won a SB...Sometimes change is good! I mean seriously, with most of these players in place during fox tenure we have a whooping total of 3 winning seasons!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know everyone is hyped over the last few games, I am too! But, given that, who's to say we don't need a little house cleaning? Even in years with few injuries and these core players we still haven't won a SB...Sometimes change is good! I mean seriously, with most of these players in place during fox tenure we have a whooping total of 3 winning seasons!

Yeah, but we also havent had a losing season in the past 3 years......

amirite?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...