Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

resign hollis thomas as player, coach, something i dont care


Fiz

Recommended Posts

He did do a great job filling in but we should have our big man back next year... and there is no need for Hollis so I think we should let him go and he can be of some use for someone eles who needs him due to injuries or lack of production by their DTs... 35 years old ... We have some young guys that i'd like to see step up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not keep Hollis and Kemo? Hollis, Kemo, Tyler, Leonard, possibly Lewis, Brayton, Brown, Johnson, possibly Peppers... pretty damn good D-Line.

I would love to see that... we know these guys can step up and play, and we'd have alot of depth.. but do we have enough room on our roster? I mean who would we be willing to let go in other spots? Would it be worth keepin a 35 year old Hollis and letting go of a 25 year old Anderson?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He did do a great job filling in but we should have our big man back next year... and there is no need for Hollis so I think we should let him go and he can be of some use for someone eles who needs him due to injuries or lack of production by their DTs... 35 years old ... We have some young guys that i'd like to see step up.

You can't say Kemo is a better keep than Hollis. Kemo got outplayed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, you're right. It doesn't mean you can't call out his flaws and poor play. But it also doesn't mean you can't admit when he plays well and shows improvement. Not you personally, just in general I mean.
    • I will say, I do think there's a version of Bryce that could be really successful as a high-volume passer in a spread-based offense built around quick throws and timing-based intermediate throws with deeper throws schemed up around them. I actually think the power run based offense we're running is a poor fit for Bryce as it requires him to play under center far more often. It's a very traditional offensive approach whereas I think a scheme that spreads defenses out and lets Bryce distribute the ball quickly with anticipation and accuracy is the sweet spot for him. The key, of course, is to find a way to run the ball efficiently out of those formations. Our personnel right now (backs and OL) aren't good fits for that style of offense and I'm not sure it's a scheme Dave Canales favors very much either.
    • I root for him, and I hope for the best, as does essentially everyone. But that doesn’t mean you can’t call out flaws and bad plays. And that’s what a lot of people get wrong.  I hope I’m wrong and that he continues to improve a lot, I just doubt it. But I’ve been wrong before 
×
×
  • Create New...