Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2023-2024 General Canes Thread


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Pesce and his mended cock are back on the ice. Also, new lines!

Noesen - Aho - Jarvis

Svechnikov - Kotkaniemi - Teravainen (Lemieux)

Bunting - Drury - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Why people(you do it and Walt did it) MSF as the 4th line on paper is beyond me. In last change they will almost always go against the top line of the opposing team. 
 

Not saying there’s anything wrong with it. Just that we all know they aren’t our “real” 4th line, 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Harbingers said:

Why people(you do it and Walt did it) MSF as the 4th line on paper is beyond me. In last change they will almost always go against the top line of the opposing team. 
 

Not saying there’s anything wrong with it. Just that we all know they aren’t our “real” 4th line, 

I just post them how Walt posts them.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Lavalette stated that Kochetkov is expected to be recalled ahead of tomorrow’s game against Buffalo.

Guess the plan is to give Halak more time to get in game shape.

I’d rather roll with Halak. fug it. Put some pressure on our forward 18. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Harbingers said:

I guess I should pose halak as a third question. If he’s ready I don’t see why he wouldn’t at least travel. 

I just don’t feel Pytor is ready, gives me zero confidence. Especially as we have not entirely been solid in front of the goalie. Not much we can do though if Halak isn’t game ready

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The entire OP is about the play calling and results and only mentioned T-Mac one time, in the sense of our offensive struggles only made me more frustrated about our #1 WR only getting a single 2nd half target in a game we were behind for the majority of it. How is that showing my true colors? It's way more of other people reading too much into it and thinking this is all and only about T-Mac for me, but it's not.  He just happens to be the player that I specifically was upset by his 2nd half usage, but it had nothing to do with my personal feelings towards him, but that he's our only legitimate WR and he had a single target in the 2nd half after going for 73 yards in the first. To me, that is a very legitimate play calling gripe, the win or particular player aside.
    • Dowdle looked great. Watching him made this game alot of fun.  
    • We’re stuck with Bryce for now.  He led TWO drives where we came from behind to take the lead. One of them was the winning drive and he threw the winning TD. Taken as a whole…he played at expectation after the 1st quarter. That’s not so bad under the circumstances.  We got the win. Maybe they’ll struggle to build on it but a win is a win. He drove the offense down and took the lead when it was needed. You can’t take that away from him.    We’re not changing QBs anytime soon.  Or owners.  So…when they win, we should take it at face value and give credit where it’s due.  Bryce came up big in clutch moments. You can’t take that away from him.
×
×
  • Create New...