Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Steve Wilks is a better coach than Frank Reich. And it's not even close.

Dorian Gray

By Dorian Gray,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

Doesn’t matter if Wilks was right or not. He had the locker room, if we gave him his own staff(something he didn’t have in Arizona) and worked for building capital we’d be in a bunch better position than we are now. 
 

 

better position for 2023? Maybe. For the future? No. 

Weve seen how his type of coaching wouldve gone. We have 2 decades of it. Those types of coaches have been figured out. Look what has happened to Rivera since Cam could no longer carry him.

Again, the right answer wouldve been to pick the right head coach and not Reich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Bluetooth said:

show proof she was in on the Reich deal...otherwise fake news. 

Tryn tie Young and Reich on her smh...Young might be rookie of the year if he went to the Texans

There was definitely more than rumors. There was public comments she liked frank the best during the process. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
Just now, KillerKat said:

better position for 2023? Maybe. For the future? No. 

Weve seen how his type of coaching wouldve gone. We have 2 decades of it. Those types of coaches have been figured out. Look what has happened to Rivera since Cam could no longer carry him.

Again, the right answer wouldve been to pick the right head coach and not Reich.

Actually he would have been better for the future because there would have been less mortgaging if he was the coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Dorian Gray said:

And Andy Reid didn't win a Super Bowl until Mahomes. And Belichick has looked like ass without Brady. And Phil Jackson never won without Jordan or Kobe. It's almost like you need to find great players to succeed.

Reid had been to multiple NFC conference championships and a Super Bowl appearance too. Belichick is old after already winning 7 Super Bowls. Jacksons teams were more than just Jordan and Kobe.

The fact you are bringing up legendary coaches to make an argument for Wilks is just laughable.

Edited by KillerKat
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sean Payton's Vicodin Grand Master

Sean Payton's Vicodin

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Dorian Gray said:

And Andy Reid didn't win a Super Bowl until Mahomes. And Belichick has looked like ass without Brady. And Phil Jackson never won without Jordan or Kobe. It's almost like you need to find great players to succeed.

Reid was still a very good coach in Philly. Belichick's problem is that he is a shitty GM. Phil Jackson only coached the Bulls and Lakers, and left those teams before Jordan and Kobe did, so I don't know what your point is there.

Like I said, Rivera will be fired very soon. So I'm sure another team will give him the keys to this secretly elite coach (who has a .500 record). Who knows, maybe he'll get a great QB, and play his golden goose through injury again.

Edited by Sean Payton's Vicodin
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dorian Gray Proficient

Dorian Gray

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Reid was still a very good coach in Philly. Belichick's problem is that he is a shitty GM. Phil Jackson only coached the Bulls and Lakers, and left those teams before Jordan and Kobe did, so I don't know what your point is there.

Like I said, Rivera will be fired very soon. So I'm sure another team will give him the keys to this secretly elite coach (who has a .500 record). Who knows, maybe he'll get a great QB, and play his golden goose through injury again.

My point is you need great players to win championships. Period. Trying to downplay what our past coaches have done because "they were carried" while ignoring 95% of coaches are "carried" by great players doesn't make any sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Dorian Gray said:

I love how you keep missing the point.

"Cam carried Rivera" but Mahomes hasn't carried Reid. Again, got it. Your goalpost moving is impressive.

No goal post moving here. You just dont understand or refusing to understand. What has Rivera done in Washington? Using your logic, why hasnt he put together good players? Again look at the overall resume to see who has been carried. I think doing jack poo since prime Cam is enough evidence, but continue being silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

Reid was still a very good coach in Philly. Belichick's problem is that he is a shitty GM. Phil Jackson only coached the Bulls and Lakers, and left those teams before Jordan and Kobe did, so I don't know what your point is there.

Like I said, Rivera will be fired very soon. So I'm sure another team will give him the keys to this secretly elite coach (who has a .500 record). Who knows, maybe he'll get a great QB, and play his golden goose through injury again.

100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...