Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newtons team…rookie season


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Another shet post

My friend dragging Cam Newton into the debate to soften the blow of Bryce Young having a bottom 3 passer rating isn’t the flex you think it is. Cam Newton did have talent like 89 and Olsen but he also elevated those around him and even Greg Olsen himself would tell you if it weren't for Newton his career would not have had the trajectory that it did. Hey maybe Bryce Young could do these things in time we just don't know. But I can tell you no amount of grasping at straws comparison wise is going to make Bryce physically able to make the elite throws even other rookies in his draft class are making. I'd love to see it. Hopefully we will. In the meantime let's take baby steps and stop trying to draw parallels to the only MVP in franchise history when the best thing we can say about Bryce Young is he can make some nice plays when the game is already out of reach.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shocker said:

IMG_0075.thumb.png.7a572f5ef0bbb1846a0ade0124376978.png

Is this any better than Bryce’s situation?

That's Cam Newton's second season. The rookies are the ones with 'Rook' in the Yrs column. His rookie roster is below.

image.png.c84a75316274dfc8a073af20860d2645.png

Also, yes. Cam was in a better situation. He had a bonafide #1 receiver, a great pair of Running Backs in Deangelo Williams and Jonathon Stewart, an OL that could block, and a creative OC in Chud who became a Head Coach the following year. AND Greg Olsen + Jeremy Shockey at Tight End.

Edited by EgoDogg
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, EgoDogg said:

That's Cam Newton's second season. The rookies are the ones with 'Rook' in the Yrs column. His rookie roster is below.

image.png.c84a75316274dfc8a073af20860d2645.png

Also, yes. Cam was in a better situation. He had a bonafide #1 receiver, a great pair of Running Backs in Deangelo Williams and Jonathon Stewart, an OL that could block, and a creative OC in Chud who became a Head Coach the following year.

Echo in here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Shocker said:

No one can tell me Cam Newton wasn’t set up for success with that roster.  Stop being dumb folks.  Not one player on this team outside of Burns starts for that team.  

JJ Jansen.. boom..

your whole argument is null & void for being wrong on 1 certain point, a seemingly small overlook on your part decimated e’rything you’re trying to do here…

 

Seriously, Cam had much more talent to work with on both sides of the ball & to be fair, seemingly coaching too…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, j2sgam said:

JJ Jansen.. boom..

your whole argument is null & void for being wrong on 1 certain point, a seemingly small overlook on your part decimated e’rything you’re trying to do here…

 

Seriously, Cam had much more talent to work with on both sides of the ball & to be fair, seemingly coaching too…

WTF?  LOL…guess you made some sense 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...