Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other NFL Week 8 Games


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sam Howell is wrecking the Eagles

14/15 for 141 and 2 TDs barely into the 2nd quarter 

Whoever decided Corral was a better prospect than Howell should be banned from football operations. Unfortunately, those people AND that GM is still in the building

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy poo. Slye just DRILLED a 61 yarder after making a 56 yarder that got backed up due to a false start.

Howell took them 50 yards in under 30 seconds with Schlereth whining like a bitch about how they should just take a knee. 😂

Howell stats at half:

24/26 for 224 and 2 TDs.

Not too shabby if I must say so myself.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Holy poo. Slye just DRILLED a 61 yarder after making a 56 yarder that got backed up due to a false start.

Howell took them 50 yards in under 30 seconds with Schlereth whining like a bitch about how they should just take a knee. 😂

Howell stats at half:

24/26 for 224 and 2 TDs.

Not too shabby if I must say so myself.

Disgusting 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Holy poo. Slye just DRILLED a 61 yarder after making a 56 yarder that got backed up due to a false start.

Howell took them 50 yards in under 30 seconds with Schlereth whining like a bitch about how they should just take a knee. 😂

Howell stats at half:

24/26 for 224 and 2 TDs.

Not too shabby if I must say so myself.

yeah i would have taken howell over matt c, and sly is a competent kicker with a cannon for a leg. howell contract is pennies.  IDK if that team has quite enough to make noise in the NFC, they are too just inconsistent. i wouldnt want to play them in the playoffs cause you dont know if your getting a top 3 NFC team, or bottom 3. 

fitt can fug off.

in other games, malik willis has lost his job, levis is the new guy in Tenn. willis cant complete anything and fumbled one away. cant believe people bought into the 1st round hype on him. levis has old man hopkins and hop still got some game left in him. Levis is an enigma like Jeff George, no idea what hes gonna do week to week. but the arm is electric.

 

and of course i sat prescott for stroud hahahahahahahahhaha.

hahahahhahahahah. thanks FF gods. panthers appreciate this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chbright said:

yeah i would have taken howell over matt c, and sly is a competent kicker with a cannon for a leg. howell contract is pennies.  IDK if that team has quite enough to make noise in the NFC, they are too just inconsistent. i wouldnt want to play them in the playoffs cause you dont know if your getting a top 3 NFC team, or bottom 3. 

fitt can fug off.

in other games, malik willis has lost his job, levis is the new guy in Tenn. willis cant complete anything and fumbled one away. cant believe people bought into the 1st round hype on him. levis has old man hopkins and hop still got some game left in him. Levis is an enigma like Jeff George, no idea what hes gonna do week to week. but the arm is electric.

 

and of course i sat prescott for stroud hahahahahahahahhaha.

hahahahhahahahah. thanks FF gods. panthers appreciate this.

Washington's OL has been one of the worst I've ever seen and their secondary has been at least as bad as ours. That's their two big weak spots.

So basically a completely stereotypical Ron team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Washington's OL has been one of the worst I've ever seen and their secondary has been at least as bad as ours. That's their two big weak spots.

So basically a completely stereotypical Ron team.

that front 7 is dynamite plus they are deep. they do have depth at the skill positions on O, but no elite top talent. the O line is....... suspect like ours, but i wouldnt say worst ever. thats here in NC right now. and the odd thing is both have been much better with different staffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...