Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offensive Schemes, Running Game & Blocking FYIs


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Tbe said:

So you think Fitt made all these acquisitions without approval from the coaches?

Im not defending Fitt, but we all know the coaches signed off on each of these players they brought in. That’s just how the NFL works.

I mean, I think Frank "approved" of Bryce Young.  You can look at that a bunch of ways.  I mean, Frank's O cupboard was also bone dry.  Fitterer got him bodies.  That's Fitterer's job.  I don't think a retread fired Frank Reich off Rhule is slinging a lot of weight in Carolina.  They just had that experiment. Sheepish Frank early on in the season has pretty much confirmed that IMO when he gives insights to how he is being treated by this front office.   I think the Panthers, not Frank, have made a lot of decisions that Frank has "approved".  Frank Reich doesn't look and sound very happy with his employment.   

that's just my gut take of how things are in an overcorrection Carolina after Rhule.   I mean, no matter who you want to spin it....end of the day, this front office is making moves that don't align with what the O wants to do.  Which is a massive red flag in any org.   And Frank came out the gate hard being a 180 from Wilks.   Fitterer didn't know that?   Or he did?  Some are bending over backwards for Fitt.  End of the day, no matter how you might defend or deflect for Fitt.....he ends up being either being a pointless yes man to every human he encounters or he is just a bad GM.   There just is no argument for him to be here.  There isn't a positive.   He is either making bad decisions or he can't stop his all powerful HCs from making them (and no one is buying Frank is that)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Based on the arguments you're making, that part seems pretty obvious 😄

I mean, not much of an argument is needed what I argue these days. 

Scott Fitterer is a bad GM.  There is only really one human on this vast board that is going to take great issue with such. 

Frank Reich isn't a good coach. 

Tepper is bad owner who hires poorly (see Rhule, Frank, Fitt) 

We did a poor job this offseason in terms of adding talent for what Bryce/Frank would be doing. 

It's largely Frank's O we are running. 

Carolina Panthers are a bad football that team that sells and spouts a bunch of bologna to the masses.  Because that's what bad teams do.  There declarations don't mean much so don't carry a lot of weight in arguments.   And they have proven that. 

Only you take issue with these "extreme" takes lol. The reason I have been right about so much the past couple years about what is going to happen (and it largely has played out how I called it)....is because my takes are boring.   Last 2 seasons have played out almost exactly as I called them.  Babe Ruthing it.  There is no homerism in them anymore.  The bad here is painfully obvious.  Happy Thanksgiving.  

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, not much of an argument is needed what I argue these days. 

Scott Fitterer is a bad GM.  There is only really one human on this vast board that is going to take great issue with such. 

Frank Reich isn't a good coach. 

Tepper is bad owner who hires poorly (see Rhule, Frank, Fitt) 

We did a poor job this offseason in terms of adding talent for what Bryce/Frank would be doing. 

It's largely Frank's O we are running. 

Carolina Panthers are a bad football that team that sells and spouts a bunch of bologna to the masses.  Because that's what bad teams do.  There declarations don't mean much so don't carry a lot of weight in arguments.   And they have proven that. 

Only you take issue with these "extreme" takes lol. The reason I have been right about so much the past couple years about what is going to happen (and it largely has played out how I called it)....is because my takes are boring.   Last 2 seasons have played out almost exactly as I called them.  Babe Ruthing it.  There is no homerism in them anymore.  The bad here is painfully obvious.  Happy Thanksgiving.  

Can't help noticing there sure is an awful lot of writing being done in these threads containing debates that you "don't care about winning" 😄

Enjoy your Thanksgiving too, dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, I think Frank "approved" of Bryce Young.  You can look at that a bunch of ways.  I mean, Frank's O cupboard was also bone dry.  Fitterer got him bodies.  That's Fitterer's job.  I don't think a retread fired Frank Reich off Rhule is slinging a lot of weight in Carolina.  They just had that experiment. Sheepish Frank early on in the season has pretty much confirmed that IMO when he gives insights to how he is being treated by this front office.   I think the Panthers, not Frank, have made a lot of decisions that Frank has "approved".  Frank Reich doesn't look and sound very happy with his employment.   

that's just my gut take of how things are in an overcorrection Carolina after Rhule.   I mean, no matter who you want to spin it....end of the day, this front office is making moves that don't align with what the O wants to do.  Which is a massive red flag in any org.   And Frank came out the gate hard being a 180 from Wilks.   Fitterer didn't know that?   Or he did?  Some are bending over backwards for Fitt.  End of the day, no matter how you might defend or deflect for Fitt.....he ends up being either being a pointless yes man to every human he encounters or he is just a bad GM.   There just is no argument for him to be here.  There isn't a positive.   He is either making bad decisions or he can't stop his all powerful HCs from making them (and no one is buying Frank is that)


Yes, I think Frank is a complete yes man when it comes to what players to get. 

I get it though. When the team plays bad you don’t want the coaches blaming you. You want them to have the exact players they asked for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

Fitterer continued to build a roster for an offense that wasn't suited or catered to what Frank/Young would be doing this year and would want to do in the future going forward.   You intentionally attempt to not comprehend that.  Because it highlights how inept Scott Fitterer is.  How dysfunctional our front office and Fitterer CONTINUES to be post Rhule.    What you are doing is simple and easy to understand. 

I'm just not understanding what you keep talking about in regards to "building an offense" for what Frank/Young wanted would be doing.

I think we all agree throwing Moore into the trade with Chicago was something that Tepper at least signed off on, if not encouraged.  

Free agency started on March 15th. Panthers were by all reports all in on stroud until they had dinner with him on March 22nd, when SOMETHING in the national/beat writer conversation changed. And then the draft happened on April 27th. So he had a month, starting a week after the start of free agency, so do....what? Like what moves are you saying he didn't do? 

Are you upset about him signing Thielen? That seemed to work out. Chark was probably someone Staley wanted due to their connection in Detroit. Sanders was someone Reich wanted for whatever reason. There was an attempt to resign Forman but I've heard conflicting reports about whether he was asking too much or they were lowballing him. 

No one here is defending Fitterer. He has to go. But no one is quite understanding the point you're trying to make. And quite frankly I have no idea what you're talking about.

What moves did Fitterer not make that he could have, given the timeline and the likely late change to Bryce in the predraft process? 

To me, all this seems like a Coach and a GM had an idea of how the team was going until the owner just decided to change everything at the last second. It completely fits Tepper's MO up to this point and his reputation that is coming out more and more. 

Quote

Real extreme lol.  I mean, frankly I go back and forth with you because I find it fun. It's not about winning a debate.  No one can convince you of anything.  I'm under no illusion of that.  

So you're laughing, actually?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

I'm just not understanding what you keep talking about in regards to "building an offense" for what Frank/Young wanted would be doing.

I think we all agree throwing Moore into the trade with Chicago was something that Tepper at least signed off on, if not encouraged.  

Free agency started on March 15th. Panthers were by all reports all in on stroud until they had dinner with him on March 22nd, when SOMETHING in the national/beat writer conversation changed. And then the draft happened on April 27th. So he had a month, starting a week after the start of free agency, so do....what? Like what moves are you saying he didn't do? 

Are you upset about him signing Thielen? That seemed to work out. Chark was probably someone Staley wanted due to their connection in Detroit. Sanders was someone Reich wanted for whatever reason. There was an attempt to resign Forman but I've heard conflicting reports about whether he was asking too much or they were lowballing him. 

No one here is defending Fitterer. He has to go. But no one is quite understanding the point you're trying to make. And quite frankly I have no idea what you're talking about.

What moves did Fitterer not make that he could have, given the timeline and the likely late change to Bryce in the predraft process? 

To me, all this seems like a Coach and a GM had an idea of how the team was going until the owner just decided to change everything at the last second. It completely fits Tepper's MO up to this point and his reputation that is coming out more and more. 

So you're laughing, actually?

Or looking for an exit from an argument he's losing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

 

No one here is defending Fitterer. He has to go. But no one is quite understanding the point you're trying to make. And quite frankly I have no idea what you're talking about.

 

it’s simple. 

The point: Scott Fitterer is a bad GM who shouldn’t be here.   We have a bad front office. 

Mr Scott disagrees with that point.  

so we dance in a pointless circle on that from thread to thread because Scott Fitterer does have a defender here.  I big defender

*Miles Sanders and Hubbard don’t fit a Bryce Young/Frank collab. There are threads and threads where that was discussed entering the season.  They are early down runners.  We were going to be living in the gun and pass heavy.  We needed to prioritize 3rd down style RB.  Pass pro.  Route running.  And you cans go watch QB school or whoever and watch folks highlight the poo routes, pass pro, etc by them all over the place. 

Thielen doesn’t actually work.  We force feed our entire pass game to him.  So he has empty stats on a sheet. He doesn’t have the skill set to actually be in the slot role he is in at this point. 

Chark was always pointless.  He is a one trick pony and that trick wasn’t going to be part of the act.  Bryce was going to be playing 20 yards of the field and small ball.  Chark doesn’t run the routes well Bryce would need.

Said coming in, Bryce 100% needed small ball skill talent.  That’s what we would be doing. It was painfully obvious.  He doesn’t have a single player for it.   Again, those QB School breakdowns just echo this too.  How all the routes are slow.  It’s not even just Theilen.  He gets the most heat because we put our pass game through him.   

It’s a painful marriage on every level.  There was no real vision or plan and we are seeing the results. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft/bestavailable
    • https://www.pff.com/news/draft-the-best-remaining-players-ahead-of-day-3
    • Per PFF: 1. CB Jermod McCoy, Tennessee Volunteers McCoy's medical evaluations will be critical, but based on his measurables and 2024 tape, he profiles as a first-round talent with shutdown potential in press-man coverage. 2. CB Keith Abney II, Arizona State Sun Devils Abney's lack of length and top-tier athleticism may limit him to zone schemes, but his competitiveness and run-defense mentality make him a valuable rotational defensive back with starter potential. 3. CB Keionte Scott, Miami (FL) Hurricanes Scott is a tone-setter in run defense with a physical mentality. His zone coverage is adequate, but man coverage limitations may restrict his role. 4. WR Skyler Bell, Connecticut Huskies Bell looked uncoverable at times against his level of competition in his final season and, despite below-average size and athleticism, produced like a top-100 prospect as a productive slot receiver. 5. WR Bryce Lance, North Dakota State Bison Lance dominated FCS competition as a versatile “X” receiver. He moves well for his size and pairs that with reliable contested-catch production, giving him a strong case as an early Day 3 pick with the potential to develop into a contributing NFL receiver. 6. ED Joshua Josephs, Tennessee Volunteers Josephs has an appealing blend of size and explosiveness but must improve his technique and anticipation to reach his potential. 7. ED Dani Dennis-Sutton, Penn State Nittany Lions Dennis-Sutton projects best as a 3-4 defensive end with some 4-3 flexibility. His length and size are clear strengths, though his agility in space is more limited. With ascending play, he could be drafted higher than his current tape suggests. 8. DI Gracen Halton, Oklahoma Sooners Halton is an undersized, versatile defensive lineman who wins with quickness, effort and movement skills. His lack of strength can be an issue, but he fits well in multiple or movement-based fronts. 9. HB Mike Washington Jr., Arkansas Razorbacks Washington brings alluring size, straight-line speed and yards-after-contact potential as a power back, but also noticeably good vision and footwork to be a potential early-down back in a committee in a man- or gap-scheme run game. 10. WR Elijah Sarratt, Indiana Hoosiers Sarratt may profile as a below-average athlete for an NFL “X” receiver, but there is still plenty to like in his game. His strong hands, coordination and determination at the catch point — combined with his constant competitiveness — give him starter potential as an outside WR2 in offenses that value jump-ball opportunities. 11. WR Deion Burks, Oklahoma Sooners Burks' size and production do not clearly point to a future NFL contributor, but his athleticism and strength make him difficult to dismiss. He offers intriguing upside as an explosive slot receiver, though he may not fit every scheme. 12. DI Darrell Jackson Jr., Florida State Seminoles Jackson is a massive, powerful defensive tackle with imposing physical traits. When his hand usage is right, he can be dominant, but inconsistency in technique and processing limits his impact. He remains a high-upside prospect. 13. C Connor Lew, Auburn Tigers Lew is a technically sound center with excellent leverage, balance and posture. His consistent fundamentals allow him to win positioning battles, though he can struggle against top-end power due to his lighter build. His upside is high given his age and technique. 14. LB Kyle Louis, Pittsburgh Panthers Louis is an undersized linebacker who projects best as a versatile space defender. In the right role, he can be an impact nickel player thanks to his explosiveness and coverage ability. 15. S Kamari Ramsey, USC Trojans Ramsey provides versatility with the ability to play both safety spots and the slot, particularly in two-high looks. His lighter build and good — but not elite — athleticism cap his ceiling. 16. CB Chandler Rivers, Duke Blue Devils Rivers logged 3,186 defensive snaps across four seasons at Duke and allowed just one touchdown in coverage in 2025, with a sub-85.0 passer rating when targeted for the third straight year. He earned a 90.7 PFF grade in 2024 before taking a step back in 2025. Over the past three seasons, he has been flagged just four times while playing more than 70% of his snaps on the outside. 17. C Sam Hecht, Kansas State Wildcats Hecht delivered a strong 2025 campaign, earning an 80.3 PFF overall grade that ranked fourth among centers. He brings a balanced profile, ranking 10th in PFF run-blocking grade (77.7) while holding up adequately in pass protection. Across 759 snaps, he allowed just seven pressures, with zero sacks and zero quarterback hits, and committed no penalties. 18. CB Devin Moore, Florida Gators Moore is an appealing Day 2 prospect with a strong blend of length, speed and ball skills for press-man coverage, though his injury history could impact his draft position. 19. G Jalen Farmer, Kentucky Wildcats Farmer put together a solid but unspectacular 2025 season, earning a 69.8 PFF overall grade that ranked 93rd among guards. His best work came in pass protection, where his 72.4 PFF pass-blocking grade ranked 256th, while his 67.4 run-blocking grade ranked 113th. Across 818 snaps, he allowed 14 pressures, including three sacks and no quarterback hits, and committed one penalty. 20. ED LT Overton, Alabama Crimson Tide Overton fits best as a 3-4 defensive end with inside-out versatility. He can contribute in a 4-3 as a power end, but his lack of bend and stride length limits his ability to consistently threaten the edge. 21. QB Garrett Nussmeier, LSU Tigers Nussmeier brings NFL bloodlines and a polished, foundational approach to the position, traits that fuel his confidence as a vertical pocket passer. However, his average arm strength and below-average stature could create challenges for his aggressive, gunslinging style at the next level. 22. DI Rayshaun Benny, Michigan Wolverines Benny earned a 79.3 PFF grade in 2025, ranking 62nd among 887 qualifying interior defenders. He posted a 68.5 pass-rush grade (161st) and an 83.5 run-defense grade (35th). His production leaned toward run defense, with a clear disparity between phases. 23. S Genesis Smith, Arizona Wildcats Smith has intriguing size and athletic traits for a single-high role, but inconsistency with physicality and play strength limits his reliability. 24. HB Jonah Coleman, Washington Huskies Coleman may not have the flashy athleticism of a fan-favorite RB1, but his game is efficient, powerful and translatable to NFL success, specifically behind zone-blocking schemes where he can gain momentum and one-cut into rushing lanes. He also brings plus third-down reliability as a receiver and pass protector. 25. LB Keyshaun Elliott, Arizona State Sun Devils Elliott has shown flashes as a downhill player, with effectiveness as a run defender and blitzer, but his below-average frame helps explain his limitations in coverage. He earned PFF grades of 67.8 in 2024 and 67.5 in 2025, which reflect a steady but unspectacular profile. His struggles in coverage may limit his role at the next level, though he still offers some starting upside in the right situation. 26. S Zakee Wheatley, Penn State Nittany Lions Wheatley is a long, springy athlete best suited for single-high roles. His slender build can be exposed in the box, but he offers strong range and coverage ability in space. 27. CB Malik Muhammad, Texas Longhorns Muhammad is a decorated cornerback from one of the nation's best secondaries, and his size and pedigree point to starting potential at the next level, particularly in a zone-oriented scheme. He earned PFF grades of 78.5 in 2023, 71.7 in 2024 and 70.8 in 2025. His lighter frame and limited disruptiveness remain concerns and may factor into evaluations despite the overall profile. 28. TE Michael Trigg, Baylor Bears Trigg may have one of the widest ranges of outcomes in the 2026 class. At his best, his vertical athleticism and contested-catch ability suggest top-50 potential, but inconsistencies with technique and focus create volatility in his projection. 29. DI Dontay Corleone, Cincinnati Bearcats Corleone, known as “The Godfather,” was one of the most dominant run defenders in 2022, using his size and strength to control the line of scrimmage. His performance has declined in recent seasons, and his 2024 medical history adds some concern. He offers rare quickness for a nose tackle and can control blockers despite shorter arms, though his pass-rush impact remains limited. He projects as a traditional 3-4 nose tackle. 30. T Dametrious Crownover, Texas A&M Aggies Crownover stands out for his massive frame at 6-foot-7 and 319 pounds with over 35-inch arms, which should earn him a look at the next level. However, he must translate those physical traits more consistently in pass protection to reach his potential. He earned a 58.4 pass-blocking grade in 2025 and allowed two sacks, two hits and 23 hurries across 428 pass-blocking snaps. 31. ED Anthony Lucas, USC Trojans Lucas has an NFL-ready frame and good overall athleticism for his size, but he does not consistently win quickly enough to project as a full-time edge rusher. His length and strength give him versatility across the front in odd schemes. 32. LB Deontae Lawson, Alabama Crimson Tide Lawson is undersized but experienced and quick. He projects as a rotational linebacker with some starting potential. 33. DI Kaleb Proctor, Southeastern Louisiana Lions Proctor, No. 111 on PFF’s Big Board, offers an unusual profile given his size and level of competition, but his explosiveness and pass-rushing ability stand out. His 2025 production supports that evaluation, as he earned an 86.5 PFF grade and generated 39 pressures, including nine sacks, four hits and 26 hurries. His performance against LSU in particular highlights his upside and reinforces his case as a potential late-round value. 34. CB Will Lee III, Texas A&M Aggies Lee, No. 114 on PFF’s Big Board, offers an intriguing developmental profile, as his size, length and leaping ability translate to strong ball skills. He earned a 66.5 PFF grade in 2025 after a stronger 76.2 mark in 2023, and he recorded eight pass breakups in each of the past two seasons. His run defense, tackling and penalty discipline remain areas for improvement, but the physical tools and ball production point to late-round value. 35. G Billy Schrauth, Notre Dame Fighting Irish Schrauth’s career included injury setbacks, but his play on the field showed a high level of performance for Notre Dame. He earned an 82.7 pass-blocking grade and a 73.1 run-blocking grade in 2025, and he did not allow a sack or a hit while surrendering just two hurries across 213 pass-blocking snaps. His game features strong pad level, a firm anchor in pass protection and good grip strength, though balance and foot speed present some limitations. The overall profile supports projection as a starting-caliber interior lineman. 36. WR Brenen Thompson, Mississippi State Bulldogs Thompson’s elite speed and big-play ability will draw interest, but his below-average size and inconsistent contested-catch rate complicate his projection. He ran a 4.26 40-yard dash, which ranks in the 100th percentile at the position, along with a 2.53-second 20-yard split in the 93rd percentile. In 2025, he caught 57 of 87 targets for 1,054 yards and six touchdowns, averaging 2.77 yards per route run and 4.3 yards after the catch per reception
×
×
  • Create New...