Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 Mock Drafts


pantherj
 Share

Recommended Posts

I try to limit to one trade per draft since the trade back options on PFN mocks can get unrealistic quick. 
 

Worthy- this offense desperately needs a deep threat and someone who can make something out of nothing. Worthy can do both.

COMP: Devonta Smith

Braelon Allen- we have a need for a short yardage/goal line back. 

COMP: James Conner (less tenacious)

James Williams- a dawg Morgan is looking for. This guy will deliver big hits as a rookie. Shaq replacement?
COMP: Kam Chancellor (game has changed where Kam types are playing LB now)

Beaux Limmer- know little about him. Took best graded OL available.

Joe Milton- Similar to Braelon Allen, this is an attempt to beef up our short yardage game. We will need to grind out games relying on our defense until we acquire the weapons needed at skill positions. Milton would be trained to execute the Philly QB sneak and build a goal line/short yardage package for him. Never know what he might become down the road.

Quinton Newsome- know little about him. Took best graded CB available.

 


IMG_2192.thumb.jpeg.5f4a23501b5ba04fe6b448c858aec2e5.jpeg

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, rayzor said:

we should do this.

image.png.c87e9afed0b390188f1275f1adebc0e5.png

ladd and xavier in back to back picks would be a home fuging run. It's like the only realistic scenario I'm happy with WR at both 33 and 65

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, SOJA said:

ladd and xavier in back to back picks would be a home fuging run. It's like the only realistic scenario I'm happy with WR at both 33 and 65

there's a few more i'd be good with myself, but what im hoping we do is get two good complimentary WRs. Adding in a big TE, two RBs with some power and fight and then another utility guy that can be a return specialist...i know we've got a lot of needs all over the place, but i just don't know when we'll see such a good group of playmakers again. i'll be disappointed if we don't come away with at least 3 offensive playmakers. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

some combo of back to back WRs to start like Mitchell and then Leggette would be my ideal draft.  I then would go BPA of offensive positions after that.  TE, RB, OL.  

I want all offense.  That IMO should be the priority.  Infusing this team with offensive talent.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2024 at 9:30 AM, CRA said:

some combo of back to back WRs to start like Mitchell and then Leggette would be my ideal draft.  I then would go BPA of offensive positions after that.  TE, RB, OL.  

I want all offense.  That IMO should be the priority.  Infusing this team with offensive talent.   

Part of me would feel guilty for not getting Evero anyone for the D, but we are in desperate need of help in offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another Sunday, another mock draft. I see a lot of you going WR early so I tried something different.  I'm a little sick of constantly striking out on WRs we draft in R2. 

 

 

 

Screenshot_20240310_130756_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20240310_130818_Chrome.jpg

Screenshot_20240310_130829_Chrome.jpg

Edited by Hoenheim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The problem that Bryce faces is his lack of prototypical tools.  He's not the tall, strong armed mobile QB that tends to get drafted first overall.  His game is not played in underwear on a practice field.  His best asset are his intangibles.  They aren't sexy like a cannon arm or a fast 40 yard dash. OK, so we took the lesser athlete.  Bryce put up a pretty bad season with a bad team around him.  The coaching staff, for all it's platitudes, sucked.  They made sure Bryce could run a huddle, but didn't help him get better as a player.  Bad choice. Compare that to what other teams did to their Rookies:  they put them in position to succeed with better personnel and better play calling.  Sure, there are physical differences which are going to affect the outcomes, but you can't change it. Am I trying to ride to the defense of Bryce?  Only a little.  He's my favorite team's QB, and I believe in him.  Now, he's got this year to show that he's "the No. 1 for a reason" (Thanks CJ Stroud).  Will he, won't he?  I don't know at all.  That's on the D&D crew to put Bryce is position to play well.  Running the ball is going to make things a lot easier for Bryce.  Does that discount his success if he plays well?  For some of y'all it will.  Some of y'all just don't like Bryce, like he stole you DoorDash or something. Regardless, let's see what happens in 2024.  If Bryce stinks it up, then we're going back to the QB well again.  
    • we may think we know, but we don't know. we won't know what effect upgrades on the OL, coaching staff, and WR room will have. we don't know what scheme canales is going to put together. we don't know a lot of things.  that's why we play the games...to see what shakes out. plenty of reasons to think Bryce is limited this year...again. Plenty of reasons to see an improvement in his play. 
    • He did not elevate the players around him, but they de-elevated their QB.  A QB like Bryce needs a system, a strong OL, a Running game, and WRs that can get open.  Call him a manager at best, but so is a point guard.  That is all we should need.  He is smart enough to grow into a very effective player.  I once saw a Coach talking about the OL--i forget who it was Schottenheimer comes to mind--and he said, you can succeed if you have one weak link on the OL.  If you get 2 weak links, success comes 10x harder.  If you get three weak links, your season is over.  Your QB is injured, and you are unemployed (paraphrasing).  I would say that we had 4 weak links (Icky does not get a pass) and a RB who was not good at pass blocking. I am not saying the Bryce is the answer at QB--but I am saying we don't know yet. I know QBs (college) and when the OL sucks, they collapse mentally over time.  That is what we saw--a QB who had never played without the advantage.
×
×
  • Create New...