Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Even With the Win Today's attendance


BY9Franchise
 Share

Recommended Posts

when we get in field goal range, we play conservative--for the FG.  Good teams go for the the throat and attempt these things called "touchdowns."  In Charlotte, "touchdowns" are as rare as drop kicks or safeties. 

The players on this team are poorly coached--finding out who to keep and who to dump is going to be the real test of the next GM. 

Derrick Brown, as I have been saying, is the best player on the team--not even close.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

when we get in field goal range, we play conservative--for the FG.  Good teams go for the the throat and attempt these things called "touchdowns."  In Charlotte, "touchdowns" are as rare as drop kicks or safeties. 

The players on this team are poorly coached--finding out who to keep and who to dump is going to be the real test of the next GM. 

Derrick Brown, as I have been saying, is the best player on the team--not even close.

I was curious why they didn’t try to score a TD. I never like gambling on a kicker. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

when we get in field goal range, we play conservative--for the FG.  Good teams go for the the throat and attempt these things called "touchdowns."  In Charlotte, "touchdowns" are as rare as drop kicks or safeties. 

The players on this team are poorly coached--finding out who to keep and who to dump is going to be the real test of the next GM. 

Derrick Brown, as I have been saying, is the best player on the team--not even close.

 

2 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

I was curious why they didn’t try to score a TD. I never like gambling on a kicker. 


Had the Panthers gone for a TD and scored, they would have been up 12-7, contingent on the outcome of the two-point conversion. If they miss the conversion, an Atlanta TD wins it outright.

Up until Ridder’s INT, Atlanta moved the ball with ease the drive before the GWD. With 1st and Goal at the 1 yard line with 1:41 left, you have to keep the ball out of Atlanta’s hands at that point. You simply do not give the Falcons the ball with the chance to win/tie. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

when we get in field goal range, we play conservative--for the FG.  Good teams go for the the throat and attempt these things called "touchdowns."  In Charlotte, "touchdowns" are as rare as drop kicks or safeties. 

The players on this team are poorly coached--finding out who to keep and who to dump is going to be the real test of the next GM. 

Derrick Brown, as I have been saying, is the best player on the team--not even close.

Playing for the FG was the smart move. Especially for a terrible short yardage team. The only baffling play late was why the Falcons didn't just let Chuba score. He was dumb enough that he was trying to score and the Falcons were dumb enough to stop him at the goal line. If they let him score they're receiving a kickoff with a little under two minutes in the clock needing a TD to tie or win the game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

when we get in field goal range, we play conservative--for the FG.  Good teams go for the the throat and attempt these things called "touchdowns."  In Charlotte, "touchdowns" are as rare as drop kicks or safeties. 

The players on this team are poorly coached--finding out who to keep and who to dump is going to be the real test of the next GM. 

Derrick Brown, as I have been saying, is the best player on the team--not even close.

I felt just the opposite last week.  We had it inside at the three, the run game was working, and we dropped back to pass twice and went backwards.  Should have been more conservative.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bama Panther said:

 


Had the Panthers gone for a TD and scored, they would have been up 12-7, contingent on the outcome of the two-point conversion. If they miss the conversion, an Atlanta TD wins it outright.

Up until Ridder’s INT, Atlanta moved the ball with ease the drive before the GWD. With 1st and Goal at the 1 yard line with 1:41 left, you have to keep the ball out of Atlanta’s hands at that point. You simply do not give the Falcons the ball with the chance to win/tie. 

I see the strategy at the end of the game, but earlier, when there were inside the 10, I thought they played it safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No it wasn't. If the weather was poo and it was two contenders in the field people would've still shown up to see it.

If it was sunny and 60 there would have been 4x the amount of people there at least. Might have been falcons fans but you are bonkers if you don’t think the weather was a huge deterrent today. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Playing for the FG was the smart move. Especially for a terrible short yardage team. The only baffling play late was why the Falcons didn't just let Chuba score. He was dumb enough that he was trying to score and the Falcons were dumb enough to stop him at the goal line. If they let him score they're receiving a kickoff with a little under two minutes in the clock needing a TD to tie or win the game.

It was, but I was thinking more in terms of the pattern they have exhibited in the past and earlier in the game.  I don't think I said specifically during the last drive--but instead of taking knees, I guess it is more risky to run Hubbard up the gut with both arms around the ball?  They might have let him score--I dunno

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Playing for the FG was the smart move. Especially for a terrible short yardage team. The only baffling play late was why the Falcons didn't just let Chuba score. He was dumb enough that he was trying to score and the Falcons were dumb enough to stop him at the goal line. If they let him score they're receiving a kickoff with a little under two minutes in the clock needing a TD to tie or win the game.

Yup, it set up to play out just as we needed.  There was zero need to give the ball back to the Falcons.  As well as our D played today all it would have taken is a busted coverage or a PI on a deep ball to get them in scoring range if we got the TD.  Yes, FGs are boring (former FG kicker speaking) but when you are dealt a winning hand, just don't fug it up.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I felt just the opposite last week.  We had it inside at the three, the run game was working, and we dropped back to pass twice and went backwards.  Should have been more conservative.  

We do seem to abandon what is working.  Personally, I was excited about this staff based on the preseason hype.  I can wait to see all of them--except Evero--gone.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

If it was sunny and 60 there would have been 4x the amount of people there at least. Might have been falcons fans but you are bonkers if you don’t think the weather was a huge deterrent today. 

I was at a packed BOA stadium versus the Saints in monsoon like conditions years ago.  Rain hindered the crowd today, but it wasn't going to be close to a respectable attendance even without the rain.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many of you misread my post--I was not talking about the end of the game--that was the right play--but earlier, on third down, I think we played to conservatively and took the FG--I wanted to see a pass in the end zone--maybe they are protecting Young--but I was not sure making the score 7-6 was smart--it turned out Okay, but if we had not had that game winning drive, many of us would be speculating that decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...