Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Non-Panthers NFL Games


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I agree. I think people expected Cam to be better because of where he was drafted. Jake was a pleasant surprise. Cam with Moose and Smith would have been fun. 

Not entirely. Newton wasn't a super cerebral QB. Neither was Delhomme. They weren't Brady / Manning type quarterbacks.

Newton was just a ridiculous combo of size and speed while Jake was a balls out gunslinger. Both had Brett Favreish level accuracy.

It's possible to win in different ways.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BY9Franchise said:

He did no more for this franchise than Jake Delhomme 3 playoff appearances one SB appearance....  3 decent seasons. 3 winning seasons out of 8 isn't "driving success"

Except Jake actually showed up to play in the Superbowl...

Cam was about the only one that showed up to play in that Super Bowl... 265 passing yards before sacks and also the team rushing leader against a historic-level defense with deep level game planning and coaching. What game did you watch?

Edited by KSpan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KSpan said:

Cam was about the only one that showed up to play in that Super Bowl... 265 passing yards before sacks and also the team rushing leader. What game did you watch?

Kony Early showed up. Arguably would have been the MVP of the game if we'd won.

After that, though... 😕

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BY9Franchise said:

You are conveniently leaving out the 0 touchdowns and three turnovers (1 INT 2 FUMBLEs lost)

 

 

The int was a good pass that went off of Ginn's stone hands, and as if the fumble strip-sacks were his fault, and again, historic defense with Philly Brown out after Talib literally headhunted him.

Not sure what your angle is here but you're very objectively wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, KSpan said:

The int was a good pass that went off of Ginn's stone hands, and as if the fumble strip-sacks were his fault, and again, historic defense with Philly Brown out after Talib literally headhunted him.

Not sure what your angle is here but you're very objectively wrong.

Nice excuses try harder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Xtreme said:

Man, I'm still salty on the fact that CMC is now healthy and isn't missing any games due to injuries. 

I told y'all this was gonna happen. He missed a ton of time here with lingering nagging injuries on bad teams. I said at the time that he would've been playing if we were contending but we're not so what's the point? Sons of former players tend to be a lot smarter in these types of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just a winner? He went 6-9 last year. Just because a guy got carried to the SB by elite surrounding talent doesn't mean much. How did Nick Files pan out after catching lightning on a bottle?
    • Hurts is an elite threat with his legs though. He's gonna stress an opposing DC a lot more than Brock Purdy.
    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
×
×
  • Create New...