Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reasons to be optimistic about the 2024 offense


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

We can just restructure and extend Moton. There's no need to ship him off. He's been the best player on our line for the better part of a decade now.

Reasonably extend is fine, he's been restructured a few times it's why his hit is so high cutting/,trading him is moronic though you won't get a guy to replace his play for the 5m in savings.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder how AT feels at this juncture, I know after Frank's firing he was talking about reassessing the situation because of the changes.  If thats the case this offseason I say ship him to the highest taker. If he can get a 100/1000 season... all the better.  Otherwise I really would like to have him around as that safety blanket for another season as we're breaking in a new WR.

I agree about Tremble, but it's far past time to let Ian out to pasture and draft another TE (Sinnot (K State), Lachey (Iowa, duh) or Bell (FSU).

Figure out what we're gonna do with that poor investment in Miles Sanders.. Personally, I'd be for moving him and bringing in Braelon Allen (Wisky)/Bucky Irving (Oregon). Yet a side of me want's him to live up to his billing... but maybe at a reduced price lol.

Other than that keep improving the OL Depth, bring in guys that can compete for a starting spot and not just fill a spot. 

2 More games, if I keep seeing the offense improve I'm gonna get unrealistically excited about this offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still not sold on Icky at LT. Moving him to guard would be worth looking at in the offseason I guess, but not having a viable replacement we're right back there.

If we can get a serviceable LT through free agency or the draft, at Icky looks stellar at guard, that'd be great improvement.

Really impressed with Chuba. Definitely a reason to be optimistic.

Bryce continuing to grow and improve, another reason. Especially if we can get a coaching staff in here early. Would like to see him do like some of the other QBs and get together with his receivers in the off season on their own for a couple of weeks and build that chemistry.

Chark finally showing up.  Thelein just needs to stay healthy and hold off father time another year or two. 

If we could get a first rounder plus anything else for Burns, I'd say go for it. Get us some help on the OL and at WR.  But don't trade away any draft capital beyond the first 4 rounds. We need depth in the worst way.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bigjohn said:

I'm still not sold on Icky at LT. Moving him to guard would be worth looking at in the offseason I guess, but not having a viable replacement we're right back there.

 

 

He is not there yet, but he has the tools.  Year 3 should be the tell.  I think they asked too much of him, scheme wise--but there were times he simply got beat.  Jury is out.  I think he might make a good guard, but I also think we have to give him every opportunity to develop before kicking him inside--how long that is is debatable. 

It is going to be interesting to see what they do, but with so many (perhaps) bigger needs, I think he gets year 3 at LT by default if nothing else.  I think the light will come on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The game yesteday showed what the offense looks like when the pieces all work together: O-line provides enough protection, Young throws crisp passes and receivers makes plays. We don't get to face the Packers defense every week, though, so we definitely need more pieces in place. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Night and day difference in the front office investements.  Since Morgan has been in the FO (5 years)....4 out of 5 first round picks have been offensive players.  The one defensive pick was a corner. Expand it out to the first 2 rounds? 7 out of the 9 picks have been offensive.  That IMO is why our D sucks so bad.   You build defenses up front.   Carolina hasn't been investing there.  Ron's first 5 years? 3 of the 5 first round picks were defensive players.  Expand it all to include second rounders  7 of the 10 picks were defensive.  All front 7 players.     
    • I think he gets this year to show what he can do.  Last year, we had a lot of injuries. This year, we should have some players, even if we lose one or two.  It's the first preseason game.  Some of the starters weren't even in it.  There is no scheming or game planning.  Let's see how guys do when it counts. I think we have a GM that knows a thing or two about defense.  Let it play out.
    • I was ok with the mentor aspect of keeping Dalton, but wow has he fallen off the deep end. The slow behind the WR interception was awful. I keep hearing our WRs created no separation, but on that particular play dude was wide open and Dalton couldn't get it to him with a clean pocket. Next year, we need to address the backup QB spot haaaaaard!
×
×
  • Create New...