Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

300k Fine for Tepper


jb2288
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, MHS831 said:
5 hours ago, Billy Love said:

I know this is not a popular take on this subject but. I think Tepper is humiliated by his behavior, he acted like a child and the whole world including his wife and peers saw it. I do believe he wants to win and is frustrated by his pitiful results. Combine these 2 things and he’s hopefully at a point of self reflection that will bore some real change. Don’t give up. 

I see your point and wish I could share in your optimism-i have had the same thoughts.  Until he takes his hands off the steering wheel, this franchise is headed for the iceberg.

It's more likely he takes the Michael Jordan approach and goes completely underground and never speaks to the press again and/or appears in any sort of public forum.

Good news is even in that scenario there's no chance the Panthers plumb the depths of ineptitude the Bobcats descended to under almost 20 years of "leadership" by MJ!!  😁😂

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, RayRedd said:

I sure wish the legal system/authorities (and fans) in Charlotte interpreted the definition of "assault" in a manner that even remotely approached what's being expressed in this thread!!

This is what "assault" looks like:

image.jpeg.9db5e2b359ece736a8e74dad06ce9e68.jpeg

image.jpeg.3253b827513baec6c316d5bc887b8313.jpeg

Maybe this will help. 

A lot of it has to do with intent, but pushing is assault, for example, even if the recipient of the push is not bruised or hurt in any way.  Most people are not bruised by pushing.  Throwing a drink in someone's face is a form of assault and here is a similar example.  I know a guy who was a teacher leaving a school board meeting and some angry protestors gathered outside.  A man threw a pizza crust at the teacher, hitting him in the back.  The man filed a complaint, and the pizza tosser was arrested at his home that night.  Not sure if it was stuffed crust or deep dish--details were not provided in the police blotter the next day.  The intent was to provoke an altercation and humiliate a teacher leaving a school board meeting.  By your standards, this is acceptable if it did not cost the teacher a pint of blood or an eye, and that is not the case.  This post seems to suggest there is no legal recourse for someone throwing fluids into your face if it does not leave a mark.  It is important to understand the difference between assault and battery.

Elements of Assault  It is noteworthy that someone can be charges with assault without an act of violence.  An attempt to injure someone is also considered assault.   So Tepper would have to explain why he felt that throwing fluid into someone's face is not an attempt to injure that person (using the legal definition of injury, which could be humiliation or public ridicule).
  • The act was intended to cause apprehension of harmful or offensive contact.  (CHECK--it was meant as an offensive gesture to cause apprehension or provoke violence)
  • The act indeed caused reasonable apprehension in the victim that harmful or offensive contact would occur. (CHECK--offensive contact did occur--throwing fluid in someone's face is "offensive contact."  any reasonable person might feel threatened.  Note there is still no mention of contusions or broken bones)
  • There was an imminent physical gesture signifying a threat.  (CHECK.  throwing anything at anyone is a threatening, physical gesture)

Battery  The actual violent act, as you pictured, is battery, most likely, assault and battery, which means the intent and acts to cause violence and the violent act itself.  Assault is the intent to harm or injure regardless of the degree of violence or successful execution of that act--and the violence itself is battery.  So when you show pictures of assault and battery you are not accurately depicting simple assault with no battery.  It is confusing, but if you angrily throw fluid in someone's face--even if you miss the target---it is assault because the intent was to physically (not verbally or emotionally) injure (harm, ridicule, defame, humiliate) another person.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Captroop said:

I'm fine with it. I'm just relieved the league didn't dock us a draft pick. A financial penalty for Tepper, no matter how small, at least doesn't set the team back further. It would be awful for the fan base to suffer (moreso) for that jackass's actions. 

It might be more comforting to have them dock us a pick. That will save us another bust.

But, then Fitt would just make some other horrible FA signing instead.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Throwing a drink in someone's face is a form of assault and here is a similar example.

This did not happen.

 

11 hours ago, MHS831 said:

By your standards, this is acceptable if it did not cost the teacher a pint of blood or an eye, and that is not the case. 

Complete non-sequitur...nonsense.

 

I'd love it if local authorities rallied and did an about-face by getting behind the our hard-working police officers once again..

...but that's just not the world we are currently living in.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a billion dollars in $100 bills stacked on 12 pallets................Tepper has 20.6 loads of what you see here or a total of 2,472 pallets of $100 bills.

The individual wrapped stacks of $100 bills you see here in the foreground are worth about $300k.........so his fine is one of those individual stacks from a palletized supply over 20 times larger than what you see here.

Or if you were "just a millionaire" that fine by percentage would amount to $14.98. 

main-qimg-fc8b97e22416f6ce1fd9312d84bb5205.webp

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, RayRedd said:

This did not happen.

 

Complete non-sequitur...nonsense.

 

I'd love it if local authorities rallied and did an about-face by getting behind the our hard-working police officers once again..

...but that's just not the world we are currently living in.  

 

 

We both know that's not going to happen. All the simpletons of society have been brought up to believe "Policeman bad, criminals doing bad very acceptable and good. If any policeman stops my crime then they must be bad. Any arrest must be corrupt and just another cop harming innocent citizens on their way to do good for society" Ya know, the typical narrative that is modern day pop culture and indoctrinated into the mush minds of America everyday on television.

Edited by Ricky Prickles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...