Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers closing in on hiring DAVE CANALES

Coheed

By Coheed,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

UNCrules2187 Mentor

UNCrules2187

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Word was they were pretty high on Callahan before the Titans got him. Hence why I fear we panicked here.

It also comes off as a "bidding against ourselves" sort of thing since no one else was pursuing him. There was no need to rush...but we did.

I hope it works, but it might be one of those cases of "more lucky than good".

I think where I'm at is that all HC hires fall into a camp of "more lucky than good". You could have the most thorough process and still end up with a dud. The Falcons have interviewed 14 candidates; we'll see who they ultimately end up hiring, but just because they are being slower/"more deliberate" in their approach doesn't mean they'll get someone who's going have better odds of success than Canales will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, UNCrules2187 said:

I think where I'm at is that all HC hires fall into a camp of "more lucky than good". You could have the most thorough process and still end up with a dud. The Falcons have interviewed 14 candidates; we'll see who they ultimately end up hiring, but just because they are being slower/"more deliberate" in their approach doesn't mean they'll get someone who's going have better odds of success than Canales will. 

Depends on the people doing the hiring.

The Steelers have been pretty good with that, which was one reason why I was hoping Tepper would consult with Kevin Colbert.

The Eagles have also been good at it lately, although they've also created a toxic environment that hinders the ones they hire.

Others, like us, don't really seem to have a whole lot of logic to the process. We're just hiring whoever impresses us in an interview.

Maybe they'll be good, maybe they won't.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jamos14 Experienced

jamos14

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I like the hire already, but is this really true? Good stuff if so

 

https://us.londonspeakerbureau.com/speaker-profile/mike-forde/

https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2022/1/6/22869889/nfl-coaching-carousel-avoid-mistakes  _ Forde is basically the entire article.

Can't find the link for Sportsology and Shannhan/Lynch but you'll find it if you look hard enough, out there somewhere.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jamos14 Experienced

jamos14

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, jamos14 said:

 

https://us.londonspeakerbureau.com/speaker-profile/mike-forde/

https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2022/1/6/22869889/nfl-coaching-carousel-avoid-mistakes  _ Forde is basically the entire article.

Can't find the link for Sportsology and Shannhan/Lynch but you'll find it if you look hard enough, out there somewhere.

 

 

 

And Brandt Tillis is also mentioned in this article with Forde in it. 

 

No surprise then that Tepper is looking to bring him on after KC season ends.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...