Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Officially Entering My Vote for WR Keon Coleman


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I think we have seen that Mingo needs to be upgraded. We don't have the luxury of assuming anyone on our roster is going to pan out. Most will not.

yeah, Mingo seems to fall into the developmental window.  I don't think we should be inking him into occupying any role on this O.    He needs a lot of work before he become dependable.  You definitely don't want to not draft someone because of him. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

yeah, Mingo seems to fall into the developmental window.  I don't think we should be inking him into occupying any role on this O.    He needs a lot of work before he become dependable.  You definitely don't want to not draft someone because of him. 

We don't have that luxury. As it currently stands, it's unlikely you will see any current WR on our roster still in a Panthers uniform in a couple of seasons.

You go into this draft assuming none of these guys are part of our future. That goes well beyond WR. Almost every position on this team is the same. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You also need polished WR's that get separation, run good routes ans make plays in space. Coleman doesn't tick all those boxes while some others that MAY be available might. It's BPA. If that Coleman at the time, by all means. But I don't want to see another classic Panthers reach on gamble in the 2nd or 3rd. Seen enough of those, thanks.

yeah, same people claiming I over value the 40 in this Coleman talk overlook at got Mitchell over Worthy too. 

and if you look at Coleman's draft evaluations.  What are his weakness.  They all come back to some variation of route running, separation, etc. at this next level.   Often in the praise section about him being able to body guys.   No one until recently was begging for what Coleman represents given the state of the Panthers.   We all have talked about how flawed the KB logic was for Cam.  IMO, this is more of the same.  We need speed.  And we might need quickness even more than that. 

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, same people claiming I over value the 40 in this Coleman talk overlook at got Mitchell over Worthy too. 

and if you look at Coleman's draft evaluations.  What are his weakness.  They all come back to some variation of route running, separation, etc. at this next level.   Often in the praise section about him being able to body guys.   No one until recently was begging for what Coleman represents given the state of the Panthers.   We all have talked about how flawed the KB logic was for Cam.  IMO, this is more of the same.  We need speed. 

 

100%. I am not saying he might not pan out but he has a lot of very classic red flags for a WR in recent drafts.

I get it, the idea of a guy just plucking passes over the top of helpless DB's is great but this isn't college football. Almost all these guys are fast as fug, skilled as fug and can jump high as fug. 

Steve Smith didn't need to be that size to body people and jump over then. That is TRULY about the Dawg in you. I am not convinced I saw anything like that in Coleman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mingo was so bad that I'm honestly not factoring him into our draft plans. If he develops into something that's just an added bonus but I wouldn't plan on it.

A rookie WR in that shitty offense? Yeah I wouldn’t write that off yet. He was a 2nd/3rd on most boards. I’m curious to see how he does with a different staff. Plus we don’t have the luxury of writing him off yet. Waaaay too many holes to fill. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Navy_football said:

Ladd McConkey running a sub 4.4 is all I needed to see. If he's still there at 33, you run that selection in, just in case somebody made a mistake. No replays. 

I love Ladd. First of all he's a Dawg like me, he plays every play, he's got a high football IQ, and, maybe most importantly, he's probably the best route runner in his class, but...it I probably would pick Mitchell first due to that size and speed. In a perfect world, I'd grab both.

Now I'm hearing that 6 QBs could go in the first (Chicago, Washington, New England, Minnesota, Las Vegas and Denver). If that's the case, then that will push other players down. Ladd or Adonai (though probably less so) could realistically be on the board at 33.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think we have seen that Mingo needs to be upgraded. We don't have the luxury of assuming anyone on our roster is going to pan out. Most will not.

It’s nearly impossible to upgrade everyone in one year. These young players need some time with real coaching. Looking at our offense Sanders had his worst year, Chark did as well, so did Hurst, our OL regressed, and Young played well below expectations. I’m basically treating any offensive rookie last year like a rookie this year. AT and Chuba looked decent in that awful offense but everyone else was awful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, CRA said:

He ran a 4.6 yesterday.  2nd worst time of all WRs.  That ain’t what we need IMO.   Not at 33.  Not with all the speed and good WRs in this draft 

it's a 40 time. this guy ran back kicks and blew past everyone while at FSU. He just has injury problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RumHam said:

it's a 40 time. this guy ran back kicks and blew past everyone while at FSU. He just has injury problems.

dude had 600 yards out of the ACC.... and he wasn't top WR in yards per reception.  

I'm only knocking him at 33 given who else is going to be likely available.  I'd say his main strength was contested catches at FSU.  I just think there are more explosive players. 

I just don't love either of the FSU guys this year.   I'd love a late flier on their QB though. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It’s nearly impossible to upgrade everyone in one year. These young players need some time with real coaching. Looking at our offense Sanders had his worst year, Chark did as well, so did Hurst, our OL regressed, and Young played well below expectations. I’m basically treating any offensive rookie last year like a rookie this year. AT and Chuba looked decent in that awful offense but everyone else was awful. 

I am guessing if things go about average(and historically we are far, far, far below average) in the upcoming drafts, it would take 6-10 years of solid drafting(not great just solid) to really mold the current situation in a proper rebuild. We have next to no foundation. That takes a substantial amount of time to build properly if you want it through the draft.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am guessing if things go about average(and historically we are far, far, far below average) in the upcoming drafts, it would take 6-10 years of solid drafting(not great just solid) to really mold the current situation in a proper rebuild. We have next to no foundation. That takes a substantial amount of time to build properly if you want it through the draft.

6-10 years?  By 10 years the original players are retiring or on the way towards retirement lol.  You don't need to hit on 53 players in the draft to build a roster.  If they know what they're doing, the team can be turned around in 2-3 seasons.  Probably more like 3 in this case.  You need to hit on a few picks and then fill in the rest however you can.  Great players have the effect of making the role players better.  For example, Derrick Brown made the entire defense better last year.  Our team sucks, but hitting on a few picks makes a world of difference.  We haven't really hit on any picks since Marty Hurney got fired a 2nd time.

The only time a rebuild takes 10 years is when it takes 7 or 8 years to hire the right people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CRA said:

dude had 600 yards out of the ACC.... and he wasn't top WR in yards per reception.  

I'm only knocking him at 33 given who else is going to be likely available.  I'd say his main strength was contested catches at FSU.  I just think there are more explosive players. 

I just don't love either of the FSU guys this year.   I'd love a late flier on their QB though. 

 

he also knows how to run routes, is very smart, has good hands, and is a proven leader. Seems people complained about route running. I also like Legette a lot, but i think he struggles with route running. we need lineman, this isn't 7 on 7 and a quarterback that is allowed to make more plays with his legs and not just stand in the pocket like it is a 7 on 7 game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RumHam said:

he also knows how to run routes, is very smart, has good hands, and is a proven leader. Seems people complained about route running. I also like Legette a lot, but i think he struggles with route running. we need lineman, this isn't 7 on 7 and a quarterback that is allowed to make more plays with his legs and not just stand in the pocket like it is a 7 on 7 game.

Legette is intriguing.  Really came out of nowhere.  More on the raw side but you really got to love what he did out of the SEC this year.  And everyone on the field knew that is where the ball had to go for Rattler to make a big play and he just kept making them. 

I'd don't love him at 33 but I'd love him at a different spot.  I'll be honest, I hate our draft position for this year.  All we got is that 33 in the top 2 rounds.  Not sure I'll love anything given how little we have lol.  Maybe I will change my mind about trading down the more I think of it. 

I just hope we take advantage of the WR talent in this draft and walk away with someone at WR in round 2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Legette is intriguing.  Really came out of nowhere.  More on the raw side but you really got to love what he did out of the SEC this year.  And everyone on the field knew that is where the ball had to go for Rattler to make a big play and he just kept making them. 

I'd don't love him at 33 but I'd love him at a different spot.  I'll be honest, I hate our draft position for this year.  All we got is that 33 in the top 2 rounds.  Not sure I'll love anything given how little we have lol.  Maybe I will change my mind about trading down the more I think of it. 

I just hope we take advantage of the WR talent in this draft and walk away with someone at WR in round 2. 

i mean it's not going to happen this year. you can get high talent at G/C/TE right here and potentially ILB/DT. I have no issue with that. but reaching for a WR and we never draft WR good in the second round should be a red flag. Can also nab a RB here that's high, b/c these are just not positions highly valued on draft lists, but we can use literally any of these spots. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah bad angle for her.   I just watched something on this and I didn’t know so maybe someone else didn’t know either… NFL policy these days on this is they don’t hand out any discipline until the legal process is complete.  The option mentioned was ‘paid leave’ in the interim.    Falcons are likely going to have to pay him but not have him, and he will probably be able to afford his attorneys. 
    • It isn't about looking bad, it's about proving the person that made the draft pick is right. Do I have definitive proof? No. What i do have are a series of events that when placed in order make no sense unless the purpose is to protect Bryce from being outshone by another QB and benched/cut.  1. Hiring of Reich to build his offense. Darnold is released and Reich gets to pick a shiny new QB to work with. After all, we signed him to a six year contract, so it's fair to assume he would have major influence in that decision.  2. Bryce interviews privately with Tepper, where he wows them with his ability to break down a play over dinner. By all accounts, Bryce is a very likeable, charming guy being interviewed. Even brought up here recently after an interview he did.  3. The sudden emergence of the S2 as the new "it" test to determine QB prowess after it's revealed Purdy, Mr Irrelevant himself, scored high and displaced the 9ers costly 1st round pick, Trey Lance. Bryce scores off the charts, and Stroud's results are "leaked" and he's publicly shamed as an imbecile going into the draft process. 4. Bryce is selected 1st overall, a QB that in no way fits Reich's QB type. Frank becomes disinterested, doesn't appear to put much effort into developing an offense for Bryce, round peg, square hole deal.  5. An obviously unprepared Bryce is named starter, and goes on to have one of the worst rookie seasons in NFL history. The only game he didn't play, Dalton, in Seattle in the rain with Zavala giving up 14 pressures in that game, made the offense look alive, something we hadn't seen from Bryce. Bryce returns, offense goes back to crap.  6. Season 2, new HC, a QB whisperer to fix Bryce. Dalton returns and the only other camp competition is Plummer, who looks like he might actually be the worst QB not named Jimmy Claussen to ever get a number in camp. Bryce named starter again after leading the team yo the 1st overall pick, which was part of the package we traded away to get him.  7. Bryce is benched, Dalton comes in, starts 5 games, less than 100k yards, 7tds 6 ints, and makes it pretty clear he's not the long term answer for anything, not even being a backup. Bryce returns after Dalton's car crash and finishes the season playing better, but still not enough to guarantee he's the future.  8. This past off-season, Dalton gets a 2 year, almost fully guaranteed deal, when there are FA backups available who at least have potential if Bryce gets benched or injured again. One of those backups actually put up better numbers in 5 less games this year than Bryce, in case you were wondering. Then, lo and behold, Plummer is brought back for training camp. The guy so bad people were calling for him to be cut for the hot dog guy, or maybe Terry Bradshaw, the senile version on Fox. Plummer is cut again, shocker, and away we go into 2025.  9. Bryce starts off the year in typical fashion, lays a couple duds, then gets bailed out by Rico running wild for over 500 yards against the 2 worst defenses in the NFL. The entire season is up and down, with one exceptional game against Atlanta followed by a sewer plunge in Seattle. Multiple opportunities to win the division or win the big game when needed. Didn't show up for those. Finally breaks 3k yards for the season on a Standford band prayer. We make the playoffs when Tampa loses, since we couldn't do it ourselves. Bryce has a playoff game highlighted by a few beautiful throws and a final drive that looked like a deer in the headlights. 4 and out, 3 timeouts left unused.  Now you could say that's a whole lot of nothing, but I see a whole lot of shielding to keep a bottom tier performing QB shielded from any real competition in the QB room. And I was right about Dalton. One game when Bryce was injured, and he looked worse than done. Phillip Rivers played better after being on his couch for 3 years. And let's not forget, Bryce also refuses to do anything about his footwork which is constantly being brought up. He says it's fine.  So why did they pick up the 5th year? Who knows. I still say they should have played him on the final year of his contract as a one year prove it deal. But when you look at everything and the way it's transpired, I think it's pretty easy to see that someone at the top has been out to prove he made the right choice and that is David Tepper. So in response to the original question i commented on, what has Bryce done to guarantee the starting spot to the point of not even putting a viable backup at the number 2 spot? Not a damn thing
    • I held a similar opinion, ie he was gonna play how he wanted to play. So that’s the offense you end up with.  Even if you would rather take a more traditional approach it would hard because, he was going to play how he wanted to play.     I thought he saw himself as the number one weapon. Did I want a more diverse attack with more pocket passes and less running and option type plays? Yep.    Chudzinski’s 2nd year here I thought he was getting too cute and chasing a HC job, which he got, but I would like to have seen him committed to running an offense he built around Cam.    I think we missed out on that type of opportunity, getting Shula.  But one thing about him, Ron didn’t have to worry about losing his OC every couple of years to a HC job. Lol.
×
×
  • Create New...