Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Officially Entering My Vote for WR Keon Coleman


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I think we have seen that Mingo needs to be upgraded. We don't have the luxury of assuming anyone on our roster is going to pan out. Most will not.

yeah, Mingo seems to fall into the developmental window.  I don't think we should be inking him into occupying any role on this O.    He needs a lot of work before he become dependable.  You definitely don't want to not draft someone because of him. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

yeah, Mingo seems to fall into the developmental window.  I don't think we should be inking him into occupying any role on this O.    He needs a lot of work before he become dependable.  You definitely don't want to not draft someone because of him. 

We don't have that luxury. As it currently stands, it's unlikely you will see any current WR on our roster still in a Panthers uniform in a couple of seasons.

You go into this draft assuming none of these guys are part of our future. That goes well beyond WR. Almost every position on this team is the same. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

You also need polished WR's that get separation, run good routes ans make plays in space. Coleman doesn't tick all those boxes while some others that MAY be available might. It's BPA. If that Coleman at the time, by all means. But I don't want to see another classic Panthers reach on gamble in the 2nd or 3rd. Seen enough of those, thanks.

yeah, same people claiming I over value the 40 in this Coleman talk overlook at got Mitchell over Worthy too. 

and if you look at Coleman's draft evaluations.  What are his weakness.  They all come back to some variation of route running, separation, etc. at this next level.   Often in the praise section about him being able to body guys.   No one until recently was begging for what Coleman represents given the state of the Panthers.   We all have talked about how flawed the KB logic was for Cam.  IMO, this is more of the same.  We need speed.  And we might need quickness even more than that. 

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, same people claiming I over value the 40 in this Coleman talk overlook at got Mitchell over Worthy too. 

and if you look at Coleman's draft evaluations.  What are his weakness.  They all come back to some variation of route running, separation, etc. at this next level.   Often in the praise section about him being able to body guys.   No one until recently was begging for what Coleman represents given the state of the Panthers.   We all have talked about how flawed the KB logic was for Cam.  IMO, this is more of the same.  We need speed. 

 

100%. I am not saying he might not pan out but he has a lot of very classic red flags for a WR in recent drafts.

I get it, the idea of a guy just plucking passes over the top of helpless DB's is great but this isn't college football. Almost all these guys are fast as fug, skilled as fug and can jump high as fug. 

Steve Smith didn't need to be that size to body people and jump over then. That is TRULY about the Dawg in you. I am not convinced I saw anything like that in Coleman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mingo was so bad that I'm honestly not factoring him into our draft plans. If he develops into something that's just an added bonus but I wouldn't plan on it.

A rookie WR in that shitty offense? Yeah I wouldn’t write that off yet. He was a 2nd/3rd on most boards. I’m curious to see how he does with a different staff. Plus we don’t have the luxury of writing him off yet. Waaaay too many holes to fill. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Navy_football said:

Ladd McConkey running a sub 4.4 is all I needed to see. If he's still there at 33, you run that selection in, just in case somebody made a mistake. No replays. 

I love Ladd. First of all he's a Dawg like me, he plays every play, he's got a high football IQ, and, maybe most importantly, he's probably the best route runner in his class, but...it I probably would pick Mitchell first due to that size and speed. In a perfect world, I'd grab both.

Now I'm hearing that 6 QBs could go in the first (Chicago, Washington, New England, Minnesota, Las Vegas and Denver). If that's the case, then that will push other players down. Ladd or Adonai (though probably less so) could realistically be on the board at 33.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think we have seen that Mingo needs to be upgraded. We don't have the luxury of assuming anyone on our roster is going to pan out. Most will not.

It’s nearly impossible to upgrade everyone in one year. These young players need some time with real coaching. Looking at our offense Sanders had his worst year, Chark did as well, so did Hurst, our OL regressed, and Young played well below expectations. I’m basically treating any offensive rookie last year like a rookie this year. AT and Chuba looked decent in that awful offense but everyone else was awful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, CRA said:

He ran a 4.6 yesterday.  2nd worst time of all WRs.  That ain’t what we need IMO.   Not at 33.  Not with all the speed and good WRs in this draft 

it's a 40 time. this guy ran back kicks and blew past everyone while at FSU. He just has injury problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RumHam said:

it's a 40 time. this guy ran back kicks and blew past everyone while at FSU. He just has injury problems.

dude had 600 yards out of the ACC.... and he wasn't top WR in yards per reception.  

I'm only knocking him at 33 given who else is going to be likely available.  I'd say his main strength was contested catches at FSU.  I just think there are more explosive players. 

I just don't love either of the FSU guys this year.   I'd love a late flier on their QB though. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It’s nearly impossible to upgrade everyone in one year. These young players need some time with real coaching. Looking at our offense Sanders had his worst year, Chark did as well, so did Hurst, our OL regressed, and Young played well below expectations. I’m basically treating any offensive rookie last year like a rookie this year. AT and Chuba looked decent in that awful offense but everyone else was awful. 

I am guessing if things go about average(and historically we are far, far, far below average) in the upcoming drafts, it would take 6-10 years of solid drafting(not great just solid) to really mold the current situation in a proper rebuild. We have next to no foundation. That takes a substantial amount of time to build properly if you want it through the draft.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am guessing if things go about average(and historically we are far, far, far below average) in the upcoming drafts, it would take 6-10 years of solid drafting(not great just solid) to really mold the current situation in a proper rebuild. We have next to no foundation. That takes a substantial amount of time to build properly if you want it through the draft.

6-10 years?  By 10 years the original players are retiring or on the way towards retirement lol.  You don't need to hit on 53 players in the draft to build a roster.  If they know what they're doing, the team can be turned around in 2-3 seasons.  Probably more like 3 in this case.  You need to hit on a few picks and then fill in the rest however you can.  Great players have the effect of making the role players better.  For example, Derrick Brown made the entire defense better last year.  Our team sucks, but hitting on a few picks makes a world of difference.  We haven't really hit on any picks since Marty Hurney got fired a 2nd time.

The only time a rebuild takes 10 years is when it takes 7 or 8 years to hire the right people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CRA said:

dude had 600 yards out of the ACC.... and he wasn't top WR in yards per reception.  

I'm only knocking him at 33 given who else is going to be likely available.  I'd say his main strength was contested catches at FSU.  I just think there are more explosive players. 

I just don't love either of the FSU guys this year.   I'd love a late flier on their QB though. 

 

he also knows how to run routes, is very smart, has good hands, and is a proven leader. Seems people complained about route running. I also like Legette a lot, but i think he struggles with route running. we need lineman, this isn't 7 on 7 and a quarterback that is allowed to make more plays with his legs and not just stand in the pocket like it is a 7 on 7 game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RumHam said:

he also knows how to run routes, is very smart, has good hands, and is a proven leader. Seems people complained about route running. I also like Legette a lot, but i think he struggles with route running. we need lineman, this isn't 7 on 7 and a quarterback that is allowed to make more plays with his legs and not just stand in the pocket like it is a 7 on 7 game.

Legette is intriguing.  Really came out of nowhere.  More on the raw side but you really got to love what he did out of the SEC this year.  And everyone on the field knew that is where the ball had to go for Rattler to make a big play and he just kept making them. 

I'd don't love him at 33 but I'd love him at a different spot.  I'll be honest, I hate our draft position for this year.  All we got is that 33 in the top 2 rounds.  Not sure I'll love anything given how little we have lol.  Maybe I will change my mind about trading down the more I think of it. 

I just hope we take advantage of the WR talent in this draft and walk away with someone at WR in round 2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Legette is intriguing.  Really came out of nowhere.  More on the raw side but you really got to love what he did out of the SEC this year.  And everyone on the field knew that is where the ball had to go for Rattler to make a big play and he just kept making them. 

I'd don't love him at 33 but I'd love him at a different spot.  I'll be honest, I hate our draft position for this year.  All we got is that 33 in the top 2 rounds.  Not sure I'll love anything given how little we have lol.  Maybe I will change my mind about trading down the more I think of it. 

I just hope we take advantage of the WR talent in this draft and walk away with someone at WR in round 2. 

i mean it's not going to happen this year. you can get high talent at G/C/TE right here and potentially ILB/DT. I have no issue with that. but reaching for a WR and we never draft WR good in the second round should be a red flag. Can also nab a RB here that's high, b/c these are just not positions highly valued on draft lists, but we can use literally any of these spots. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 600 I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...