Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another CB?


scratched
 Share

Recommended Posts

I doubt there's more CB added. Horn, Hill, jackson are the starters. This team has carried 4-5 CBs most rosters in the past. Jamison and Bootle are good enough as well. 

Im always a sucker for tossing a late round pick at CB, one of the higher hit rates once its the 5-7 rounds. captain and Norman are proof from the terrible drafting panthers...

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I doubt there's more CB added. Horn, Hill, jackson are the starters. This team has carried 4-5 CBs most rosters in the past. Jamison and Bootle are good enough as well. 

Im always a sucker for tossing a late round pick at CB, one of the higher hit rates once its the 5-7 rounds. captain and Norman are proof from the terrible drafting panthers...

jackson was a 7th rounder

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Is this rumored or you're speculating?  Howard used to be a fuging monster, buy I imagine he's starting to show his age.

Pure speculation. I see only one true starting CB on the roster. And he hasn’t been able to stay on the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthero said:

If he can, I'm all for it. We got a laundry list of needs. If Dane pans out, I'll be giddy. Giddy. 

Yeah you gotta fix what you can with what's available this year and try to add more next year.  I'm all for bpa regardless of position instead of looking for specific positions. I don't like to put blinders on and try to address a specific position or side of the ball. We just can't afford to do that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The entire OP is about the play calling and results and only mentioned T-Mac one time, in the sense of our offensive struggles only made me more frustrated about our #1 WR only getting a single 2nd half target in a game we were behind for the majority of it. How is that showing my true colors? It's way more of other people reading too much into it and thinking this is all and only about T-Mac for me, but it's not.  He just happens to be the player that I specifically was upset by his 2nd half usage, but it had nothing to do with my personal feelings towards him, but that he's our only legitimate WR and he had a single target in the 2nd half after going for 73 yards in the first. To me, that is a very legitimate play calling gripe, the win or particular player aside.
    • Dowdle looked great. Watching him made this game alot of fun.  
    • We’re stuck with Bryce for now.  He led TWO drives where we came from behind to take the lead. One of them was the winning drive and he threw the winning TD. Taken as a whole…he played at expectation after the 1st quarter. That’s not so bad under the circumstances.  We got the win. Maybe they’ll struggle to build on it but a win is a win. He drove the offense down and took the lead when it was needed. You can’t take that away from him.    We’re not changing QBs anytime soon.  Or owners.  So…when they win, we should take it at face value and give credit where it’s due.  Bryce came up big in clutch moments. You can’t take that away from him.
×
×
  • Create New...