Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looking at Potential Line-Ups...


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

I know a lot was made of the Burns deal and lack of return, but it's common sense that when a team is gonna pay a guy -- 150/5 -- the trade investment will be less....should we have traded Burns maybe, but we also expected to retain him for less than the referenced amount. I lead with that to get into the following as his absence opened up 24M in the additional cap, and it looks like it is being put to good use....

The Defense:

(* represents free agent)

DL - Brown / Tuttle / Robinson*

Edge - Johnson, Barno (TBD - Clowney*, Wonnum*, Young*)

ILB - Shaq, Jewell*

CB - Horn, Jackson*

Nickel - Hill

FS - Woods

SS - (TBD - Fuller*)

With Clowney, Wonnum, Young, and Fuller all visiting today / this week, we will possibly sign some combination of the four. For the sake of the exercise, just looking at those names in those positions above it's hard not to say this would be an improvement over last years personnel even with the absence of Brian. Not to mention the potential to add a piece or two within our first few top 100 selections. 

____________________________________________________

The Offense:

(* represents free agent -- ** represents a trade)

QB - Young, Dalton

HB - Sanders, Hubbard, Blackshear

WR - Johnson**, Thielen, Mingo, ISM, Marshall

TE - Tremble, Thomas

T - Ickey, Moton

G - Hunt*, Lewis*

C - Corbett

It's been a lot of commentary as to ''what is the plan'' I think anyone paying attention should see the plan is beginning to show itself, Morgan, and company have taken an ''inside, out'' approach to this free agency. The first three acquisitions were all positions closest to the ball on each respective side. Two guards, and an interior defensive lineman. 

From there the next acquisitions were -- ILB, CB, traded for a receiver 

If you believe in a more ''traditional'' approach to building a team this is the format, it stands to reason skill positions will likely be the focus of the draft with some depth interior pieces added per side of the ball. 

It will be interesting to see how all of this comes together over the Spring, but once you get past the Burns trade, and look at the comparison of Jewell to Luvu, it's easy to feel better about the decisions that are currently being made, especially if they close on a couple of the edge guys visiting currently. 

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, shaqattaq said:

Hubbard, Blackshear, 5th round Draft pick, Sanders as far as I'm concerned.

Although, with the IOL upgrades, there's a chance Sanders could return to 2022 form.

Sanders can go. He was a Duce Staley's hand picked RB. We don't need his fumbles and terrible vision while complaining about the fans

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jasonluckydog said:

That offense looks like a pile of shitt  topped with another pile of shitt.  A true shitt sandwich. 

dump sanders, draft Braelon Allen.  the run game behind the new guards will become the identity of the team and take an enormous amount of pressure off Young.  no more lost 3rd and short.  It will be a gimmie.  Allen literally drags the pile 5 yards.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hubbard could be in for a breakout season if that offensive line gels. Low key one of the best Panthers draft picks of the last 5 years. If the offense focuses on relentlessly running the ball, setting up play action and taking pressure off of Bryce, the offense might not be dogshit. 

Still a lot of holes on defense. Man, what an exodus of what was a pretty solid unit last year. Luckily Evero is grabbing a new of his guys in free agency, especially if they get Fuller at safety. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not as low on Sanders as some, he and Chubba were both under 4 ypc under the last regime. 

Chubba - 3.8 (1 FUMB) - https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/gamelog/_/id/4241416/chuba-hubbard

Sanders - 3.3 (2 FUMB) - https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/gamelog/_/id/4045163/miles-sanders

---------------------------------------------------------------------

In my estimation the scheme / personnel were simply the issue because in 2022, and we won't even bring up Sanders (then) or even Swift (most recently) behind the PHI OL.

Chuba behind ours in 2022 averaged 4.9 ypc, so even he averaged 1 yard less YPC in 2023. 

Last season offensively was a complete cluster, and while the personnel is still being put together it's hard to argue that really both of those guys suffered from the same issues this past season as neither was really better or worse than the other. 

It simply felt worse because they went out and spent some decent money on Miles, and Chuba is a 5th round guy that has improved since a rough rookie season.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
    • Well I guess he should stop playing football. This was his defining moment and chance to prove he was generational and he failed. What a waste of football life..
×
×
  • Create New...