Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurney on WFNZ @ 4:00 today


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

"We've made these moves and kept our identity" Says Oline is stronger this year. Two of the best RB's in the league. Says Moore has the chance to be a VERY good QB.

Kept what identity? A team that made the Playoffs and got torched in 05 and 08?

And yes, Moore will be...if we get him a solid #2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pac thinks JR is looking past 2010 writing the season off and unloading big contracts for the uncapped year. Pack says they've always wanted to win but this philosophy doesn't fit what going on.

Marty says people are afraid of change mainly and believes in the young players. Doesn't think Boldin would've been a good fit for the big picture. He would rather gain competitiveness through the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm aware of our strengths. I'm also aware we can't get back to back winning seasons. We may want to tweak our identity just a tad.

Agreed I'd prefer more balance. Two of the best RB's with one of the best passing attacks. We've got Smitty. Matt may surprise the league, yes, but we need that other WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing about the Youth Movement and draft building that bothers me, is that if there is no season in 2011, they'll sit an entire year. So in 2012, it'll be very similar to this year with them starting fresh. Things may not mesh until 2013 or 2014 for some. I want a competitive team today, not in four years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...