Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Rags Round 2 Game 2 Tuesday 7PM


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

For what it’s worth, the last time we played the Rangers in the postseason, they were the one’s in a 2-0 hole and they dug their way out. I guess it’s our turn.

Inspire Jimmy Fallon GIF by The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon
 

Believe Jason Sudeikis GIF by Apple TV
 

Believe Angels In The Outfield GIF

al recording GIF

The Rags were up 2-0 on new jersey last year....

 

The Caps were up 2-0 on us in 2019!!!

Those were road losses....

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Yeah benches Kuz, but leaves Anderson out there. Two bad decisions that hurt us.

I get it was to combat Rempe but seriously why even bother. The dude doesn’t hardly plays once the rags shorten their bench. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had every opportunity to win despite the refs obviously tilting the game.  Tic tac calls on us all night while they are punching and boarding with no calls.  Pro sports are just a popularity contest.

Our PP is trash right now.  We are just playing catch and trying to be cute. Kuzy and Noesen being out is a huge wtf

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Chief_Chokeaho said:

I’m feeling better about it today. We can still come out of this, just need to bounce back at home and go back to MSG with some momentum. 
 

PP needs some major work. Time to replace burns with TDA on PP1 imo. Or just roll with 5 forwards. 

Burns isn’t the issue on PP1. Aho is, as much as I hate to say it. The dude is not finding his outlets and just going to the blue line way too much. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Burns isn’t the issue on PP1. Aho is, as much as I hate to say it. The dude is not finding his outlets and just going to the blue line way too much. 

Agreed he's just not pulling the trigger on time either....

Which is crazy because he had 3 even strength assists last night. The rags aren't doing anything crazy on the kill it's just a standard 4 man stationary box.

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, PantherChris said:

The Canes will defend home ice....

It won't be home ice. I guarantee that the arena will be half Rags fans as Canes fans are selling their seats as we speak after losing the first 2.

Look, facts are facts. The Rags aren't that good 5v5. They are a 2-line team and can't match the Canes speed. But all of that is nullified by bad penalties and horrible officiating. You can only control one of those. And, unfortunately, the Canes vaunted PK has gone missing. It's not unlike any other post season in the last 6 years- seems the Canes always leave some part of their game off the plane, whether it's goaltending, scoring or special teams. 

I don't see the Canes winning 4 of the next 5, and I'll be pleasantly surprised if they take both at home, but I'm not anticipating it. I've resigned myself to the fact I can go to Canes games during the season and watch them play good hockey and win a lot of games. But when it comes to the post season, all bets are off.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...