Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Rags Round 2 Game 2 Tuesday 7PM


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

I mean I’m not upset about Kuzy not playing. They guy hasn’t been that good for us.  Do we know why he is out?  Also, who the fug is Comtois. Never heard of him. 
 

image.thumb.png.7a7fc78744267396420f2dcfe1cd8b0f.png

A big fighter. That’s the only reason I see playing him, is to drop the gloves with somebody.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Comtois was impressive in his one game against CBJ. His hands are poo but he generates chances and he’s a pretty big body.

I like the move.

Lemieux is easily > Comtois based on skill. The only reason I see it is to have a fighter that we can spare out of the game plan to take out Trouba or Rempe. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Lemieux is easily > Comtois based on skill. The only reason I see it is to have a fighter that we can spare out of the game plan to take out Trouba or Rempe. 

Eh I’m no so sure about that especially in our system. Comtois showed his value against CBJ, people forget he was a second round pick just like Lemieux.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Eh I’m no so sure about that especially in our system. Comtois showed his value against CBJ, people forget he was a second round pick just like Lemieux.

Lemieux is integrated in our system. Comtois is not. He’s also a big time fighter. 109PIM in the AHL this year. He was a -23. This isn’t the blue jackets rookies and bottom 6. I don’t see Rod skipping Lemieux for any other reason than having an expendable fighter that can lay out Trouba or Rempe that we don’t have to worry about getting suspended, etc. 

 

I’ll gladly eat crow if he has a good game but I don’t have a good feeling about this move. As much as I’m gonna love Macdonagh saying C** Tw** live on air. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Kuz is listed as a healthy scratch… I assume this is Rod trying to light a fire under his ass?

I suspect he's back In game three.... on the road it's harder to hide his defensive liability not sure about Como over Lemieux though 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • See my previous post. You're also leaving out that T-Mac was likely hitting a rookie wall, like 95% of rookies do late in their first season, combined with the added attention on him by defenses, which in turn would be why Bryce looked Coker's way down the stretch.  With Coker playing like that to start next year, defenses will have to pay attention to it, which will then also make things easier for T-Mac. All of which is also ignoring that T-Mac will just be a better player next year than he was this year, assuming he works on his game this offseason, which we all know he will be.  If a player who was already your clear cut #1 comes back even better his next season, you're going to make sure you're throwing it his way more often, no matter who else you have. Again, Coker's added targets won't be at the expense of T-Mac's, they will BOTH be taking targets from the rest of the team.  Not to mention, we should be passing it more next year to begin with, seeing as we'll have both of them hopefully ready to go full speed Week 1, which again, will help both their target totals increase. Coker looks like a really good player, but even the most optimistic person can't say he looks like he has #1 potential, he has very solid to maybe even high end #2 potential.  You're not taking targets away from the reigning OROY who looks like a true Top 15 WR already to get your #2 targets, you increase both of them by taking from the others.
    • Need to crush the hawks tonight. A lose would really damage momentum 
    • Sorry, but this is a terrible breakdown that doesn't at all show what you're trying to say/project about T-Mac next year, as it leaves out key information that changes everything, it makes the opposite point that you're trying to. Chase missed 5 games that second season after playing all 17 as a rookie (and still saw more targets that second season). Puka it looks like you projected his stats out to a 17 game season (as he only played 11 games), but even still , when you have 160+ targets as a rookie, there isn't really much room to get any more the next year. Waddle saw an increase in yards, and sure, his targets went down, but he played on a team with a better WR that year who saw 170 targets for 1,710 yards during that 2nd season for Waddle... something T-Mac doesn't have to contend with on the same team (280+ targets for their top 2 WRs, if you don't think T-Mac would see more than 122 targets if him and Coker combined for 287, then you're nuts). Then Olave and Wilson both saw an increase of 19 targets in their second season. You basically just laid out the reasoning for why T-Mac should see at least 20 more targets next year, if not more, which would be a solid increase and put him easily into the Top 10 most targeted WR next season.
×
×
  • Create New...