Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Off-season Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

I think some in here are over estimating how far that 27m is going to go.
 

Just Jarvis, Guentzel and Chatfield are going to cost around 17 AAV. 

 

Jarvy even with a bridge deal is going to make in the 5m AAV range. 
Guentzel is going to be in the 9m AAV range. 
Chatfield will be in the 3-4m AAV range. 

Skjei wants around 7m AAV, Pesce already turned down a 5m AAV deal last offseason. 

This team is going to see a lot of changes going into next year. I do mean a lot of them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

I know how it works, most experts aren’t expecting him back either and his Father has already made comments on this and hard rumors are saying he won’t sign because the team won’t do what Necas wants. 

I fully expect him to be traded. 100% 

You misunderstand also lol experts....

The team won't trade him for picks/prospects some one will need to ante up a real trade piece...

 

He won't sit out next season period he has value and the Canes would be idiots not to get it especially since he has 2 seasons left as an RFA which means he can arbitrate a one year deal, sign an offer sheet (which can be matched) or sit out.....which does nothing to make his two years of RFA go away..... the team has Control over him.

 

I DONT EXPECT him back but I am saying if they don't get the VALUE  they make him pound sand.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherChris said:

You misunderstand also lol experts....

The team won't trade him for picks/prospects some one will need to ante up a real trade piece...

 

He won't sit out next season period he has value and the Canes would be idiots not to get it especially since he has 2 seasons left as an RFA which means he can arbitrate a one year deal, sign an offer sheet (which can be matched) or sit out.....which does nothing to make his two years of RFA go away..... the team has Control over him.

 

I DONT EXPECT him back but I am saying if they don't get the VALUE  they make him pound sand.

They have control but they can’t afford to keep him (arbitration likely over 5-6m) if they sign Jarvy, Chatty and Guentzel to their expected AAV (17-19m) So they’ll probably want draft picks and prospects.  
 

If they don’t sign Guentzel, then yea they can afford to tell him to pound sand but otherwise they can’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Necas is not a center. Nor is he staying. Canes will get what they can for him.

Stop assuming Guentzel wants to stay.

Slavin, Skjei, Chatty, Orlov, Morrow and (insert acquired LD here). If Burns comes back he drops off the first pair.

Jarvis and Noesen are priorities, even though they both got handcuffed when RBA started changing lines.

I believe Kuznetsov is a fit on this team and would be a good asset if RBA built the right lines.

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

Necas is not a center. Nor is he staying. Canes will get what they can for him.

Stop assuming Guentzel wants to stay.

Slavin, Skjei, Chatty, Orlov, Morrow and (insert acquired LD here). If Burns comes back he drops off the first pair.

Jarvis and Noesen are priorities, even though they both got handcuffed when RBA started changing lines.

I believe Kuznetsov is a fit on this team and would be a good asset if RBA built the right lines.

 

 

 

Agree on Necas, he’s gone.

Guentzel seems 50-50 to me, Canes would have to pony up.

Still not sure Skjei will be back. From exit interviews he seemed less optimistic than Pesce and I definitely don’t think Pesce is back.

Jarvis and Noesen have to be back.

I think if Kuzy shoots more he could be a great asset. Put him with a passer like Turbo and a net front like Noesen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've never seen them outside of the structure of two very well ran organizations I'll give you that. And yes they are long in the tooth. I do think they are more than capable of getting a franchise turned around in short term capacity though. They are by no means a long term solution.
    • You're not making a good-faith argument by blaming literally everything on the quarterback when the defense gave him a fat 38 seconds to overcome its ineptitude, but it seems you're dead-set on blaming him for any problem the team encounters. In this case, it's not warranted. Sometimes it is. But he had no time to throw (pressured on 46% of all dropbacks, an insane amount) and that's simply not all his fault -- particularly when they rush 4 or less and are in the backfield in 1.5s or less. Should we have gotten more than 0 yards? Sure! But he hit a WR in the hands on fourth down and it was dropped. Not his fault. He missed one throw on second down but I attribute first down to a bad play call and third down to poor pass protection. I would've called some quick slants, personally, but it really seems you're saying: - playcalling: Bryce's fault - poor pass protection: Bryce's fault - defensive choking away a lead: Bryce's fault, not the defense - Horn dropping a pass: Bryce's fault It's a great way to garner support on here, because when it comes to Bryce, logic takes such a backseat to context that it's not even in the same vehicle. Plenty of games can be attributed to him. Can't take anyone seriously who solely blames him for that one. 
    • I don't see how you can logically make that argument when the team beat two of the top teams in the entire league during the regular season.  Now imagine the additional games we would have won against absolute tip top competitors like SF and SEA had we had a professional QB.  You can throw any random stat at the problem you want, but the proof is in the pudding.  We all watched it live.  This roster would have produced 13 wins (wins against SF and SEA, two wins against NO, and would have swept the Bucs) and (almost certainly) a #1 seed with a remotely competent QB.  Those were not games where we needed an all star performance to win.  Those were games where a very, very modest stat line would have netted us an easy win. Nearly every measurable aspect of the team would have been significantly improved with a competent QB.
×
×
  • Create New...