Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Off-season Thread


 Share

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Rangers are THE WORST fanbase in pro sports.  Still pissed seeing Florida back in the cup finals when we were the better team minus goalie play. 
 

 

Hockey is one of the weirdest sports. If you do not know the score and read comments saying “We have been the better team during this game” you’d think it was 3-0. Then you check the score and it is 0-0. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/3/2024 at 5:42 PM, MillionDollarCam said:

Some news coming in…

Seravalli thinks a Necas trade could happen this week, I’m calling BS on this.

Pagnotta says that Guentzel will test free agency and that the league things that Carolina is going to circle back on signing both Skjei and Pesce.

On Guentzel, seen some say he would be in line for 10.5m AAV on the open market. So probably gone. 
 

as for the other, Canucks have been trying to get him since before the trade deadline and he was close to being sent to them then. 
 

Canes are wanting a top level prospect back plus for Necas. 

Edited by carpanfan96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

On Guentzel, seen some say he would be in line for 10.5m AAV on the open market. So probably gone. 
 

as for the other, Canucks have been trying to get him since before the trade deadline and he was close to being sent to them then. 
 

Canes are wanting a top level prospect back plus for Necas. 

Willander for Necas, let’s get it done.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/5/2024 at 5:51 AM, Anybodyhome said:

Read another article by a Pittsburgh writer that Guentzel is going FA but won't rule out the Canes.

Sounds like Vancouver may go hard after him.

Yeah because latest projections are for his contract to be 7x10.5AAV. 
 

Necas is projected at 7x7.5AAV. 
 

don’t think Carolina pays either that kind of money. 

Edited by carpanfan96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Yeah because latest projections are for his contract to be 7x10.5AAV. 
 

Necas is projected at 7x7.5AAV. 
 

don’t think Carolina pays either that kind of money. 

Guentz has said great things about being here and caring about winning over money.  I think it's possible we can get both him and Jarvis on a slight discount

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, backINblack28 said:

Guentz has said great things about being here and caring about winning over money.  I think it's possible we can get both him and Jarvis on a slight discount

Even if he takes a slight discount, you’re still talking about 9-10AAV. I’m not sure they offer it tbh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

Even if he takes a slight discount, you’re still talking about 9-10AAV. I’m not sure they offer it tbh. 

idk. if they brought him here with the hope of re-signing him they knew it would take 8 at bare minumum. i'd go 8.5 with term easy. we can save some money letting skjei/pesce walk, trading necas and or kk. it's all about what Jake wants. if it's me in the twilight of my career i'm taking 8.5 over 10 to stay on a team this close and that seems like where his priorities are which makes a difference. I'm just hopeful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, backINblack28 said:

idk. if they brought him here with the hope of re-signing him they knew it would take 8 at bare minumum. i'd go 8.5 with term easy. we can save some money letting skjei/pesce walk, trading necas and or kk. it's all about what Jake wants. if it's me in the twilight of my career i'm taking 8.5 over 10 to stay on a team this close and that seems like where his priorities are which makes a difference. I'm just hopeful

8.5 for 9 years. Make it happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • we are not talking about the 5th we are talking about bryce being one of if not the worst starter in the nfl for the past 3 years.  Dont move the goalposts my man
    • The issue is the position Bryce plays. Finding a good/great quarterback isn't easy. Plus, it sometimes takes years for these guys to actually become good/great. What you have to look for is progress instead of regression. Bryce has shown that. Can he put it all together? We don't know yet. But that's why you place a smaller bet with the 5th year option, and wait to see. You could be wrong and lose your 30 mil bet, but you didn't hitch your wagon long-term and lose much more.
    • Absolutely not. That’s too much for replacement level player. Bryce may be that. Or he may turn into something more. If you can’t see the flashes, you’re willfully blind. There’s more bad than good right now, but there’s less bad than there was earlier in his career. He’s only 24 and he’s showing signs of improvement. He may never become consistent enough to justify a long term contract, but he’s shown enough to roll the dice on what effectively will turn into a 2 year, $30MM contract for the next two years to see if he can earn something longer.    Sure, in his one season starting, Howell managed to throw for 3,946 yards and toss 21 TDs, but it took throwing the ball an astounding 612 times. He also threw 21 INTs (for a particularly egregious 3.4 INT%). For all the talk of him being a deep ball thrower, he still only averaged 6.4 YPA, with an average air yards of 5.6 yards per attempt. And for all the excuses of Washington’s line giving him no protection (65 sacks taken that year), he was only pressured on 22.7% of his dropbacks, which is a few percentage points lower than what Bryce has had to deal with each year (24.2, 26.7, and 24.0%).    These are all numbers that are at best roughly equivalent to Bryce’s production the past two years. It’s wild to me people can claim so confidently that he’s a better QB. 
×
×
  • Create New...