Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Caleb Williams is struggling big time in OTAs


Lame Duck
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Well what I heard during the combine was very different. It was said that the top 4 was in the 90's with Youngs being the highest. That's why I didn't understand the butthurt from everyone. All 4 had similar measurables with Young being the exception in the height and weight category. That's why Young and Stroud went 1 and 2. Richardson didn't have the playing experience so I can see why he went as qb 3. Levis was just weird in too many ways to take that high. That's how I remember the combine broadcast talk. I was stuck at home so I watched it all and had to listen to all the talk from the knowitalls. 

https://wonderlictestpractice.com/s2-test-scores-for-2023-quarterbacks/

It's why they were even asking Stroud about his score in that sports illustrated article in which he responded "I'm a football players not a test taker" which I kind of liked.  There were rumors stirring around CJ might drop to the Raiders but the NFL GMs weren't that dumb.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, travisura said:

Him sucking sure would take the sting out of us gifting him to Chicago

Agreed but I’m not going to root against him or anything. Just don’t care that much and I’ve moved on from our disastrous 2023

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

https://wonderlictestpractice.com/s2-test-scores-for-2023-quarterbacks/

It's why they were even asking Stroud about his score in that sports illustrated article in which he responded "I'm a football players not a test taker" which I kind of liked.  There were rumors stirring around CJ might drop to the Raiders but the NFL GMs weren't that dumb.  

Goes to show you it's not the end all be all some want to make it out to be. That came out after the combine didn't it?

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Goes to show you it's not the end all be all some want to make it out to be. That came out after the combine didn't it?

It could have.  I don't remember the exact timing but it was close to the draft.  Regardless yeah it kind of made the S2 seem irrelevant as shown by the lack of attention it received this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It could have.  I don't remember the exact timing but it was close to the draft.  Regardless yeah it kind of made the S2 seem irrelevant as shown by the lack of attention it received this year.  

I mean, if your "cheat code" test labels one guy basically a sure thing and he looks like trash and labels another guy bottom of the barrel and he has the best rookie seasons ever... oh wee mayne. That's pretty much a kill shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I mean, if your "cheat code" test labels one guy basically a sure thing and he looks like trash and labels another guy bottom of the barrel and he has the best rookie seasons ever... oh wee mayne. That's pretty much a kill shot.

Night Night Shut Up GIF by Caged Steel

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using the S2 score alone amounts to saying 1 measurable like the strongest arm is all you need to predict a sure thing is ridiculous. If that's all it took then what's the point of every other measurable? No, it's just another thing someone will use to complain about why they didn't get what they wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Using the S2 score alone amounts to saying 1 measurable like the strongest arm is all you need to predict a sure thing is ridiculous. If that's all it took then what's the point of every other measurable? No, it's just another thing someone will use to complain about why they didn't get what they wanted.

Yeah there is no magical test that tells you how good a QB will be.  You have to look at tape, potential, character, and then they need to go to a good system where they can develop.  It seems to be the toughest position to project.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Using the S2 score alone amounts to saying 1 measurable like the strongest arm is all you need to predict a sure thing is ridiculous. If that's all it took then what's the point of every other measurable? No, it's just another thing someone will use to complain about why they didn't get what they wanted.

I wanted a good QB. Based on how Tepper raved about Bryce's "super processing" and his love for "analytics" it's logical to surmise that there's a good chance that he was a big believer in the S2 test. I want to say that maybe Joe Person even reported such. Fair Joe Person mockery aside, he certainly has a helluva better organizational sources than my non-existent ones.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah there is no magical test that tells you how good a QB will be.  You have to look at tape, potential, character, and then they need to go to a good system where they can develop.  It seems to be the toughest position to project.  

It is. It is one the if not the most important thing. The coaches and qb pairing must be right or it's a wasted pick.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...