Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Unlikely to Make a Move on GM Hurney


jakesthemistake

Recommended Posts

“I think he’s doing an outstanding job,” Morrison told the Charlotte Observer. “If you look at our track record since 2002, and our last four draft classes, having 26 of the 32 picks here…I think Marty Hurney’s excellent job speaks for itself.”

I agree with this statement, and I hope we hang on to Hurney. I have a feeling we will. I'm not of the opinion that Hurney's fate should be tied with Fox's, but I suppose it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh...I'm sorta indifferent to Hurney. He has his strengths and weaknesses. I think supporters tend to overrate him too much when trying to defend him(Same way with Fox). He's an okay GM. But his biggest problem is people will tie him to Delhomme, Peppers, and Fox(and rightfully so). I do appreciate the fact that he seems to be the only one who accepts blame in this franchise...ex: Playoff game two years ago, Buffalo Bills game last season, and recently on WFNZ.

I would have liked it if we let him go because I see Fox being gone next year, but it is what it is at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, snap! Fox has been dissed!

Not really. If they didn't offer Hurney a new contract they wouldn't have a GM come summer - his contract doesn't run through the regular season like Fox's does. Changing GMs at that time seems like a bad idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this falls under the fact of people not knowing what they have till its gone. Hurney while not the best GM in the league is not the worst ether and has put together some fine drafts. You also cant give him all the credit ether cause its three people making the decisions. JR,Fox, and Hurney. So all of them need to get credit and need to be bash some too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope we keep Fox and Hurney. Conservative, some dumb personnel move, but I think its way better then some of the alternatives

i agree. not too sure who will get fired next season, but i don't see another coach out there that will come in and do a better job than Fox. yeah, Cowher is out there, but last i heard, he wanted Tom Coughlin's job, and he'd only run the exact same offense and defense... maybe he might put a little more pep in our players' steps. but i'm ok with Fox and Hurney. it's not pretty half the time, but they get the job done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope we keep Fox and Hurney. Conservative, some dumb personnel move, but I think its way better then some of the alternatives

I do hope Fox dose well this year. Matt Moore is more then capible of putting up 20 points a game and we will get so see really what kind of OC Davidson is.

Also I really think Meeks could make our D very good given some more time.

....But Im also sure Fox will change my mind by mid season and I will be calling for his head again cause of being way to conservative and poor playcalling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...