Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schrager Interviews Canales

strato

By strato,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Very good 5 minutes in. Definitely a different side of him, not pulling out the rah rah cliche stuff, just talking about his life journey

I let it run while i was doing other stuff and really need to sit down with it but yes the vibe was much less hyped. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BIGH2001 Grand Master

BIGH2001

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

He says "We have some talent, in spots" and "There's a reason we were 2-15". Speaks on the importance of quality depth for the good Seattle years and that we have a ways to go in that department

Outside of Rae Carruth, Fitterer should go down as the biggest clown in franchise history. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

He says "We have some talent, in spots" and "There's a reason we were 2-15". Speaks on the importance of quality depth for the good Seattle years and that we have a ways to go in that department

Something I have said for several seasons. When we tore down the entire roster, it would take years to rebuild. We are years in and still haven't built it back up. That's one reason why I was so adamantly against a complete rebuild. It takes a LONG time even with semi-competent people in the front office(something we never had).

Also exactly why I don't think we will see a winning record before at least 2030.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tbe Grand Master

Tbe

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Something I have said for several seasons. When we tore down the entire roster, it would take years to rebuild. We are years in and still haven't built it back up. That's one reason why I was so adamantly against a complete rebuild. It takes a LONG time even with semi-competent people in the front office(something we never had).

Also exactly why I don't think we will see a winning record before at least 2030.


To be fair, we tried a partial rebuild but had to trade everything to make up for the mistakes of the partial rebuild.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ChibCU Experienced

ChibCU

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Something I have said for several seasons. When we tore down the entire roster, it would take years to rebuild. We are years in and still haven't built it back up. That's one reason why I was so adamantly against a complete rebuild. It takes a LONG time even with semi-competent people in the front office(something we never had).

Also exactly why I don't think we will see a winning record before at least 2030.

Not taking the Ram's offer for Burns is proof enough that we never did a "complete rebuild."

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Something I have said for several seasons. When we tore down the entire roster, it would take years to rebuild. We are years in and still haven't built it back up. That's one reason why I was so adamantly against a complete rebuild. It takes a LONG time even with semi-competent people in the front office(something we never had).

Also exactly why I don't think we will see a winning record before at least 2030.

If this year is close to last year it's pretty much a complete rebuild by default. Brown and Moton are the only healthy good players, a DT and a RT lol. They pissed away last year and this year on a bad trade and pick. They still can't draft decently. Tepper still hires 'his kind of  people'. We might be witnessing the forever  rebuild. They literally just drafted for the future on a 2 win team which sure helped get the last couple of fools canned while wasting those picks too. 2030 might be way too generous when factoring the Tepper approach.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, Tbe said:


To be fair, we tried a partial rebuild but had to trade everything to make up for the mistakes of the partial rebuild.

 

If you are constantly planning and improving your roster, maintain and draft quality depth, those "rebuilding" cycles are typically quite short. It's closer to retooling than rebuilding. We went from solid roster to absurd, raging dumpster fire. TBH, it has never really improved above the dumpster fire level. This is the least talented roster in the NFL by a fairly wide margin. That is what years of roster mismanagement will get you.

16 minutes ago, Waldo said:

If this year is close to last year it's pretty much a complete rebuild by default. Brown and Moton are the only healthy good players, a DT and a RT lol. They pissed away last year and this year on a bad trade and pick. They still can't draft decently. Tepper still hires 'his kind of  people'. We might be witnessing the forever  rebuild. They literally just drafted for the future on a 2 win team which sure helped get the last couple of fools canned while wasting those picks too. 2030 might be way too generous when factoring the Tepper approach.

If Tepper stays in Dan Snyder mode, it is likely to be a 20ish year total stretch before we have a chance build anything more than a .500ish team. Hence why I keep saying Cleveland Browns. We look very, very much like that era.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Something I have said for several seasons. When we tore down the entire roster, it would take years to rebuild. We are years in and still haven't built it back up. That's one reason why I was so adamantly against a complete rebuild. It takes a LONG time even with semi-competent people in the front office(something we never had).

Also exactly why I don't think we will see a winning record before at least 2030.

Contender sure but winning record wouldn't take nearly that long with a competent staff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, csx said:

Contender sure but winning record wouldn't take nearly that long with a competent staff. 

I don't really think we have the personnel that anything short of a superstar coach can really do much with. 

It would be nice to eat those words but our two deep is HORRIFYING. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Shotgun
      The Bryce Young "Game Winning Drive" narrative needs to end

      By Shotgun · Posted

      Rico
    • outlaw4
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      First off, my memory is faulty and so I should remember you. Anyways, welcome back. Having been around here since 2004/2005, I do have to say all these hot takes are not necessary new. I still very much remember all the constant complaints about Jake Delhomme. How he was too inaccurate, fumbled the ball too often, threw bad interceptions, and how Steve Smith deserved a better QB. How this franchise needed to replace Jake for someone better because he dragged everyone down. We even had names for Jake defenders; Blind Delhomme Jock Sniffers (BDJS). That one thread about Chris Weinke over Jake Delhomme because Weinke threw for 423 Yards but only scoring 13 points remains the worst hot takes I've ever seen around here. So to me, it feels like history repeating itself again and I don't feel like getting that much involved in flame wars like I used to. I am more of a sit back and see what the players/team does type of person. And even then, yes, there are so many moving parts that it's not as easy to pinpoint the core issues, especially when you're not inside the building and know every single detail.  And yes, I think even way back then, I hated how overvalued the QB position was and it hasn't gotten much better. It's to where my philosophy has shifted to where if you can't win a SB with a QB on their rookie contract, you might as well get another one. Otherwise, you have to give that QB so much money that the rest of the roster suffers and your window becomes quite narrow.  That's why I'm skeptical that Mahomes/Burrow/Jackson/Allen will win more than one or two SB's between them. None of them look as invisible as they did a few years ago and that's because their targets are much inferior and/or they are getting more roughed up behind a worse O-line.
    • fanpanther
      The Bryce Young "Game Winning Drive" narrative needs to end

      By fanpanther · Posted

      Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 
×
×
  • Create New...