Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schrager Interviews Canales


strato
 Share

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Very good 5 minutes in. Definitely a different side of him, not pulling out the rah rah cliche stuff, just talking about his life journey

I let it run while i was doing other stuff and really need to sit down with it but yes the vibe was much less hyped. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

He says "We have some talent, in spots" and "There's a reason we were 2-15". Speaks on the importance of quality depth for the good Seattle years and that we have a ways to go in that department

Outside of Rae Carruth, Fitterer should go down as the biggest clown in franchise history. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

He says "We have some talent, in spots" and "There's a reason we were 2-15". Speaks on the importance of quality depth for the good Seattle years and that we have a ways to go in that department

Something I have said for several seasons. When we tore down the entire roster, it would take years to rebuild. We are years in and still haven't built it back up. That's one reason why I was so adamantly against a complete rebuild. It takes a LONG time even with semi-competent people in the front office(something we never had).

Also exactly why I don't think we will see a winning record before at least 2030.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Something I have said for several seasons. When we tore down the entire roster, it would take years to rebuild. We are years in and still haven't built it back up. That's one reason why I was so adamantly against a complete rebuild. It takes a LONG time even with semi-competent people in the front office(something we never had).

Also exactly why I don't think we will see a winning record before at least 2030.


To be fair, we tried a partial rebuild but had to trade everything to make up for the mistakes of the partial rebuild.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Something I have said for several seasons. When we tore down the entire roster, it would take years to rebuild. We are years in and still haven't built it back up. That's one reason why I was so adamantly against a complete rebuild. It takes a LONG time even with semi-competent people in the front office(something we never had).

Also exactly why I don't think we will see a winning record before at least 2030.

Not taking the Ram's offer for Burns is proof enough that we never did a "complete rebuild."

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Something I have said for several seasons. When we tore down the entire roster, it would take years to rebuild. We are years in and still haven't built it back up. That's one reason why I was so adamantly against a complete rebuild. It takes a LONG time even with semi-competent people in the front office(something we never had).

Also exactly why I don't think we will see a winning record before at least 2030.

If this year is close to last year it's pretty much a complete rebuild by default. Brown and Moton are the only healthy good players, a DT and a RT lol. They pissed away last year and this year on a bad trade and pick. They still can't draft decently. Tepper still hires 'his kind of  people'. We might be witnessing the forever  rebuild. They literally just drafted for the future on a 2 win team which sure helped get the last couple of fools canned while wasting those picks too. 2030 might be way too generous when factoring the Tepper approach.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Tbe said:


To be fair, we tried a partial rebuild but had to trade everything to make up for the mistakes of the partial rebuild.

 

If you are constantly planning and improving your roster, maintain and draft quality depth, those "rebuilding" cycles are typically quite short. It's closer to retooling than rebuilding. We went from solid roster to absurd, raging dumpster fire. TBH, it has never really improved above the dumpster fire level. This is the least talented roster in the NFL by a fairly wide margin. That is what years of roster mismanagement will get you.

16 minutes ago, Waldo said:

If this year is close to last year it's pretty much a complete rebuild by default. Brown and Moton are the only healthy good players, a DT and a RT lol. They pissed away last year and this year on a bad trade and pick. They still can't draft decently. Tepper still hires 'his kind of  people'. We might be witnessing the forever  rebuild. They literally just drafted for the future on a 2 win team which sure helped get the last couple of fools canned while wasting those picks too. 2030 might be way too generous when factoring the Tepper approach.

If Tepper stays in Dan Snyder mode, it is likely to be a 20ish year total stretch before we have a chance build anything more than a .500ish team. Hence why I keep saying Cleveland Browns. We look very, very much like that era.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Something I have said for several seasons. When we tore down the entire roster, it would take years to rebuild. We are years in and still haven't built it back up. That's one reason why I was so adamantly against a complete rebuild. It takes a LONG time even with semi-competent people in the front office(something we never had).

Also exactly why I don't think we will see a winning record before at least 2030.

Contender sure but winning record wouldn't take nearly that long with a competent staff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, csx said:

Contender sure but winning record wouldn't take nearly that long with a competent staff. 

I don't really think we have the personnel that anything short of a superstar coach can really do much with. 

It would be nice to eat those words but our two deep is HORRIFYING. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
    • Well I guess he should stop playing football. This was his defining moment and chance to prove he was generational and he failed. What a waste of football life..
×
×
  • Create New...