Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young won't play in preseason opener


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Why are the same people that have written Bryce off also complaining that he’s not playing? He’s already out of the league in your eyes 

Ha ha.  We understand fully how in the league he is. 

It’s sort of like an internet hookup that you haven’t see in person. We expect her to not look like her picture but we don’t really know until we see her. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least Plummer has been getting sufficient snaps at practice and isn't getting the Corral treatment. If Canales is indeed some kind of qb whisperer he better look like he has some idea of what's going on and not a complete deer in headlights. I'm curious if Canales had a say in signing him or if Morgan just looked at the list of udfa's available and picked a name

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

every offense he has been involved with has relied on chunk pass plays downfield.   Not just relied on them but more often than not tops of the league as well.

That’s not a good pairing for Bryce 

now you could argue he suddenly do something different but to date he has never been around a successful O that didn’t rely on it.   

and his first major investment was a downfield jump ball WR so that leads me to believe that’s still his ideal brand of football.   

Hope I’m wrong and he is some grand wizard and invents something Bryce would thrive in….but I’m a need to see it guy at this point to believe it

Well put, thank you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, CRA said:

every offense he has been involved with has relied on chunk pass plays downfield.   Not just relied on them but more often than not tops of the league as well.

That’s not a good pairing for Bryce 

now you could argue he suddenly do something different but to date he has never been around a successful O that didn’t rely on it.   

and his first major investment was a downfield jump ball WR so that leads me to believe that’s still his ideal brand of football.   

Hope I’m wrong and he is some grand wizard and invents something Bryce would thrive in….but I’m a need to see it guy at this point to believe it

Seems like he's generally a Fox/Rivera/Wilks style run first guy but with just more pre snap motion. He's admitted he's not a young offensive play calling guru. I'm expecting 2012-18 Seahawks without the yolo balls which sounds super boring. Maybe some late stage Drew Brees dink and dunking mixed in

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

Everyone thinks Bryce should play except the coach apparently!

 

Interesting point 5 mins in. How come Bryce doesn't need the reps right now, but last season when we were out of any contention it was important for Bryce to finish out the season instead of seeing what the offense looked like with a proven vet like Dalton? 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Interesting point 5 mins in. How come Bryce doesn't need the reps right now, but last season when we were out of any contention it was important for Bryce to finish out the season instead of seeing what the offense looked like with a proven vet like Dalton? 

I’ll play devils advocate 

Youre going against a team in preseason that has a history of injuring player. You’re 2nd string QB is out so if you need play your starter and they suffer an injury what do you do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I’ll play devils advocate 

Youre going against a team in preseason that has a history of injuring player. You’re 2nd string QB is out so if you need play your starter and they suffer an injury what do you do?

Dunno. Dalton has a minor 2-3 quad injury and has been in warm ups so I'm guessing he would be fine to start week 1 after 5 weeks of rest/rehab

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Dunno. Dalton has a minor 2-3 quad injury and has been in warm ups so I'm guessing he would be fine to start week 1 after 5 weeks of rest/rehab

But do you as a first year head coach risk waiting for Dalton to get healthy? Again you have to look at it from Dave’s stand point.

This coming from someone who wishes Bryce playes in the preseason but I understand that this is a rebuild.

Edited by Panthercougar68
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

But do you as a first year head coach risk waiting for Dalton to get healthy? Again you have to look at it from Dave’s stand point.

This coming from someone who wishes Bryce playes in the preseason but I understand that this is a rebuild.

If I'm Canales I want to get at least a series with me on the headset, Bryce at qb, and Corbett at center in a game environment on the road so I know where we are at communication-wise. I'd much rather have that than go into week 1 assuming whatever happening in practice is going to automatically transfer over to an actual game

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, PantherBoy95 said:

Very disappointed Bryce won't be getting any reps. But I'll have some faith in Canales until he gives me a reason not to.

I have zero faith in Canales until he gives me reason to, but that's a function of Teppee's ineptitude moreso than Canales himself.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...