Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce bashing needs to stop

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)

Y'all are slanderous beyond compare. 

30 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Have all the huddle Bryce supporters bailed already?

Yeah most of them stopped when the Only Positive Bryce thread was un-stickied, and the ones that stayed, most gave it up on Sunday. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WUnderhill Grand Master

WUnderhill

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, MRenshaw said:

One of the very last Bryce stans is getting a little hissy, I see.

Don't get worked up so easily because things will likely get even worse for your golden boy. Save your energy for later.

That’s a lot of projection, but I don’t get worked up over obvious trolls. Just answer the question I’m curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr Mojo Risin Mentor

Mr Mojo Risin

Posted
Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I'm pretty sure they fled last year.  It was the wait and see people vs the I know he sucks people this offseason.  Week 1 was about as bad as it gets for the guy...

Pretty much. Once I saw he was still on his tippy toes and jump throwing the ball the worst nightmare for this franchise was all but confirmed. We drafted a bust with the #1 overall pick after trading a massive haul. There is still a small chance, very small chance they can get it turned around by the end of the year but his mechanics and lack of athleticism make it virtually improbable

Edited by Mr Mojo Risin
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Pretty much. Once I saw he was still on his tippy toes and jump throwing the ball the worst nightmare for this franchise was all but confirmed. We drafted a bust with the #1 overall pick after trading a massive haul. There is still a small chance, very small chance they can get it turned around by the end of the year but his mechanics and lack of athleticism make it virtually improbable

That is pretty much what I think. Never say never, but the odds are heavily stacked when you take in the big picture; he is squeezing his timeline now with every demonstration of his issues. 

He has to have the proper form to get the max from his arm. He hit maybe a couple of longer throws last year but with all the misses and looking at Sunday those couple of nice balls could have been accidents. I mean whatever he did, is not repeatable. Or however many good downfield throws there were, I know not many. Even with drops. 

What is happening I think is - he looked better in camp his balls looked better in the air, the form seemed to have been addressed. He was driving through it, looking good. But he hasn't taken that into the game. Snapped right back to his way at the first sign of trouble.

I probably said this before like everything else but he could sit, work, try to fix his stuff for a whole season. If anybody wants to do that. Don't even play him, redshirt his ass and rebuild him the right way; I don't know what else you can really do if he doesn't get it out of the ditch. Starting Sunday. Rock bottom, he can reach and touch it he is getting so close.

Week three is the big game for me, or was. I did not expect him to look like that. 

That stuff he is doing I just don't think it will work. Maybe I am right maybe I am wrong. Oh well. 

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MRenshaw Community Regular

MRenshaw

Posted
Posted (edited)
58 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

That’s a lot of projection, but I don’t get worked up over obvious trolls. Just answer the question I’m curious.

Not sure you know what projection means, but I hope you won't be throwing drinks next Sunday, Mr. Tepper.

Edited by MRenshaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WUnderhill Grand Master

WUnderhill

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, MRenshaw said:

Not sure you know what projection means, but I hope you won't be throwing drinks next Sunday, Mr. Tepper.

Lol, do YOU know what it means? I’ll spell it out for you. See, my implication was that you yourself got worked up and hissy over a simple question and attributed those feelings to me. Just stop trying to be clever and answer the question it was a simple question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MRenshaw Community Regular

MRenshaw

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Lol, do YOU know what it means? I’ll spell it out for you. See, my implication was that you yourself got worked up and hissy over a simple question and attributed those feelings to me. Just stop trying to be clever and answer the question it was a simple question.

That's an interesting definition from someone who initiated this exchange with a passive-aggressive ad hominem attack and got hissy when came under return fire. Take your lumps and pick a better quarterback next time, Mr. Tepper. 

P.S. Could you please bring back natural grass turf? 

Edited by MRenshaw
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WUnderhill Grand Master

WUnderhill

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, MRenshaw said:

That's an interesting definition from someone who initiated this exchange with a passive-aggressive ad hominem attack and got hissy when came under return fire. Take your lumps and pick a better quarterback next time, Mr. Tepper. 

P.S. Could you please bring back natural grass turf? 

There you go projecting again. Any perceived passive-aggression from the 4 words “Whose alt is this?” Is a reflection of your own insecurities. Relax, nobody was attacking you Mabel, it was just a logical conclusion that this is probably somebody’s alt account. I mean yeah, we all know alts are lame, but my original assumption was you had a banned account, which is less lame than somebody just hiding behind an alt. If I actually wanted to make a personal attack, there’s plenty of material there for somebody who created an account the day after the worst opening day loss in Panthers history just to troll and resurrect dead threads. You sure seem pretty insecure to be deflecting this much over a simple question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NAS Grand Master

NAS

Posted
  • Author
Posted

You can look at my post history, I was one of the first to say that It should be Stroud and it’s not even close.  But that being something we can’t change, was hoping Bryce can still become a decent QB. He clearly lacks confidence so the fan bashing was something I took issue with. But after Week 1, I have lost all hope for the kid. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPF4LIFE Grand Master

CPF4LIFE

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

Have all the huddle Bryce supporters bailed already?

I definitely don't see the usually suspects as much after the game Sunday. Panther twitter is worse. Bryce stans over there crashing out and insulting people personally out of emotion. Weak minded people who man. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Down With The Devils: Series Wrap-up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      Damn Ghost had a hell of a series then huh?
    • tukafan21
      Panthers NFC South Champs!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      The much shorter and less number analytical version of the above is that the T-Mac pick wasn't about giving Bryce an alpha receiver this season that dominates the targets. It was about shifting the rest of the WRs down a peg in their role to give Bryce better options this year while giving us a true #1 to take over next year when Thielen retires or signs somewhere else. It's to let XL and Coker grow this year as the 3rd and 4th option instead of the 2nd and 3rd option, so that they are then ready to step into those increased roles in 2026.  While at the same time it's to allow T-Mac to get used to the NFL game without the pressure on him that those rookies last year had to be THE guy.   And that's not to say he can't be THE guy, it's just that if you don't HAVE to do that to your rookie, it's better for the entire team, no matter how good that rookie may or may not be.  Expectations are different than real possibilities. It's very POSSIBLE for T-Mac to get to 1k this year, but I think it's unfair to put that EXPECTATION on him leading into the season due to the other options Bryce will have at his disposal this year.
    • tukafan21
      Panthers NFC South Champs!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Did you read my post though, I very clearly pointed out why T-Mac is in a situation that is nothing remotely like those 4 last year, so let's try again.... Malik Nabers had 1,204 yards, the next 3 best pass catchers on that team... Wan'Dale Robinson (699 yards), Darius Slayton (573), Theo Johnson (331) Brian Thomas Jr had 1,282 yards, the next 3... Brenton Strange (411), Parker Washington (390), Christian Kirk (379) Ladd McConkey had 1,149 yards, the next 3... Quentin Johnston (711), Josh Palmer (584), Will Dissly (481) Bowers had 1,194 yards, the next 3... Jacoby Meyers (1,027), Tre Tucker (529), Alexander Mattisdon (294) I'm not going to pretend I'm an expert on the games of all those next 3 players behind rookies, but I don't think it's at all a stretch to say that Thielen, XL, and Coker next year will ALL be better than EVERY player on that list with the possible exception of Jacoby Meyers. If you can't see how having Thielen, XL, and Coker on the team will take more targets from T-Mac than Nabers, BTJ, Ladd, and Bowers had taken from them with the rest of their Top 4 options on their teams, then you're just fooling yourself. Even looking at 2 years ago, Puka was the only rookie to get there, and his next 3 leading receivers were Kupp (737 in 12 games), HIgbee (495), and Atwell (483).  But this was also with the team having 4,300 receiving yards too, and if we have 4,300 yards in the passing game this year, then yes, I don't care what anyone else gets, T-Mac better be getting 1,000 or it will be a bad season for him. If you can't see that putting expectations on T-Mac in a vacuum because of what past rookies have been able to do, without any regard to the players on the team around him, then that's on you, sorry. So for you then, it sounds like you expect those yard to come from Thielen's total and that's what gets T-Mac over the 1k mark, which is a totally fair and valid prediction or expectation. Again, I'm not saying I don't think T-Mac will get to 1,000 yards. I'm saying it's not fair to have that as the EXPECTATION for him going into the season when you look at the offensive talent we have this year. Those are two VERY different things. If you EXPECT XL or Coker to take a step back and not improve this year, or if you EXPECT Thielen to finally lose a step and not come close to the 1k yard mark himself, then yes, I think EXPECTING 1,000 yards from T-Mac is perfectly acceptable in any or all of those situations and I'd then agree with you myself. But I don't expect those things.   I do expect XL and Coker to continue to improve. I do expect Thielen to have one more season of being the same guy he has been for us the last 2 years.  He's averaged 60.3 yards per game in his two years here, which would be a 1,025 yard season in 17 games.   It's going to be VERY hard if not impossible for XL and Coker to improve, Thielen to be the same player for us, and T-Mac get to 1,000 yards all in the same season.  If all 4 of those things happen, then as I've said before, Bryce might be a legitimate MVP contender as it means he's putting up video game like numbers, as it's hard to have 4 WRs who all produce like that in one season. Your argument of T-Mac not getting to 1,000 meaning either he didn't work out or the offense didn't work out, isn't fair, as there is a very real possibility that the offense clicks, all 4 of those WRs work out, and because of it, all 4 of them have suppressed stats this year compared to what they might have been able to put up without one or more of the other guys on the same team.
×
×
  • Create New...