Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

It is very early to bet on this but Hunter will without question market himself as a WR if he must pick a position but even better he will probably try to sell a two way player.  Deion did it but he ain’t Deion.  Should be very interesting 

Possibly.

 

I think he was quoted saying he prefers to be a DB. Maybe he changed his mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, strato said:

I get the market has exploded. I know nobody wants to hear hopeful poo but we have two guys high up now that have that area of expertise. I will grant that rXL was intentional for Young, but looked okay. A bright spot.

 Maybe they can do a better job at it than the people who have been doing it. 

I doubt Morgan's expertise. I still feel he got the job because he's a yes man and nobody else wanted the job.

I don't think XL was for Young either. He fits the RAS score mold the team has used since Tepper took over though. Young needed a quick, good route runner. That is not XL.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Even the best defense in this league isn’t contending if the offense is utter garbage.

I honestly think T-Mac has top 5 WR type of potential, that’s not something you pass up when you get the chance to get, especially when we’re so weak at the position.

I haven't even seen him. I guess I'd agree if we have someone to pass the ball properly. Otherwise what is the point, get a defense and a running game. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Yeah Tmac is definitely on my radar now. He was open on the last drive which would have been a TD.

Shout out Tuka for plugging his guy. He honestly wasn't even on my radar before the season.

I started a thread saying last November that he needed to be our pick in 25 lol

We have had a bunch of good players at Arizona since I went there, lots that I thought would be good NFL players, some panned out and others didn’t.

But there have only been 2 that I felt were can’t miss stars that will be many times over pro bowl type of players.

Gronkowski and T-Mac

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jayboogieman said:

I doubt Morgan's expertise. I still feel he got the job because he's a yes man and nobody else wanted the job.

I don't think XL was for Young either. He fits the RAS score mold the team has used since Tepper took over though. Young needed a quick, good route runner. That is not XL.

I wasn't talking about Morgan, he is gonna defer to Canales on that, 100%. And the OC, those guys should be better than what we have had picking them. All I am saying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, strato said:

I haven't even seen him. I guess I'd agree if we have someone to pass the ball properly. Otherwise what is the point, get a defense and a running game. 

 

Because then he’s going into his 2nd season and no longer a rookie when you use the 1st rounder on a QB in what should be a very good QB class and have an elite pairing for the next decade and a nice SB window with them on rookie deals too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Just turned the game on a minute ago ... Arizona has a Bryce-sized QB. Holy crap. But the difference is he has moxy.

The difference is that it also works in college, it just doesn’t in the NFL lol

Love Fifita, but he’s not going to be an NFL QB, even if he does end up as a Heisman candidate for the next few years

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...