Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jaxel said:

5th now, and after texas takes care of A&M next week, we will be 4th. If Vandy upsets Tennessee we will be 3rd 😄

Don’t bet on Texas taking care of A&M, Texas has played one team this year with 7 or more wins, in that game they got stomped.  Another reason why I posted above about the ACC getting exposed.  Texas hasn’t beaten anyone and they are the top of the SEC.  Alabama should have lost to SC, did lose to unranked OU and Vandy.  Ole Miss just sucks, they have Georgia and that’s about it.  I see GT beating Georgia next week, in fact I see Clemson beating SC, Louisville over Kentucky and Florida over FSU

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watch a little South Carolina football, Very little really but I saw some of the opener with ODU and some of a few more games. This guy Sellers is serious. I didn't realize he was so green in that ODU game I just thought he was not that good. From that game to now, that kid has made huge strides.

I watched most of the Missouri game and caught the endings or 4th qtrs of the Alabama and LSU games, and I just discovered that he is like 19 years old. It looks like he is going to be somebody to me. People should look at him. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure looks like Clemson vs South Carolina might esssntially be a play in game for the playoffs.  

so just purely from a “rivalry” standpoint, that setups for a great game at least. Should be good fun on an in state level and bragging rights.  

I used rivalry in quotations since SC has only won one game in the last decade and has overall been dominated in the series. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, CRA said:

Sure looks like Clemson vs South Carolina might esssntially be a play in game for the playoffs.  

so just purely from a “rivalry” standpoint, that setups for a great game at least. Should be good fun on an in state level and bragging rights.  

I used rivalry in quotations since SC has only won one game in the last decade and has overall been dominated in the series. 

I don't see Clemson getting in unless they win the ACC.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I don't see Clemson getting in unless they win the ACC.  

Be close.  AP and coaches for them at #12.  Teams head or them will lose.  The SC win would be a good one.   So what do you do with them.

Committee would defiantly have to consider them for an at large.  Never would have believed it was possible until that perfect storm of Ls Saturday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I don't see three ACC teams making the CFP.

No but they will more than likely get 2.  The funny thing is, the SEC has a chance to only get 1.

If GT beats Georgia this weekend the only way Georgia gets in is if they beat Texas then what happens to Texas.

Clemson beats SC, they will be the higher rank out of Alabama, Texas AM and Ole Miss

Vandy can beat Tennesse, if that happens Tennesse is out

So I see SMU beating Miami, Miami is out

Clemson and SMU from the ACC

Texas or Georgia from the SEC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mack Brown has backed off that return talk now saying his focus is on State and not the future. If we win he'll be back for sure. A competitive loss and he's probably back. But if we aren't competitive I think he's probably out.

So with that said, as hard as this is to say... State PLEASE best the poo out of us. Embarrass us. Taunt. Celebrate. Turn Keenan red. Save us from ourselves!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I don't see three ACC teams making the CFP.

Miami still has to beat Syracuse and they struggle w/ everyone in the ACC.   

Then someone takes an L in the ACC title game.  So you just not going to drop them after an L?  

I think the math is now open for 2 ACC teams to get in.  Think it would depend on what the Ls look like going forward. 

and that's if Clemson can beat a ranked SEC USC.  

People will be arguing about the 11th and 12 spot just like they used to argue about spot #4

but I mean, however gets in....doesn't belong in the CFP.  It should be 4 teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...